The Godfather: Part III

[Bada0Bing]

You must be registered for see images attach

Amazon.com essential video
Sixteen years after Francis Ford Coppola won his second Oscar for The Godfather II (his first was for the 1972 Godfather), the director and star Al Pacino attempted to revive the concept one more time. Despite an elaborate plot that involves Michael Corleone seeking redemption through the Vatican while simultaneously preparing his nephew (Andy Garcia) to take over the Corleone family, the film fails to take shape as a truly meaningful experience in the way the preceding movies do. Still, Pacino is very moving as an elder Michael, filled with regret and trying hard to make amends with his wife (Diane Keaton) and grown children (one of whom is played, and not all that well, by the director's daughter, Sofia Coppola). --Tom Keogh

Recently watched it. I've seen the first two multiple times, but had never watched #3. About what I expected after hearing all the complaints over the years. One thing that drove me crazy was the way Mary delivered her lines. It was like fingernails on a chalkboard at times.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099674/

 

[AzStevenCal]

Recently watched it. I've seen the first two multiple times, but had never watched #3. About what I expected after hearing all the complaints over the years. One thing that drove me crazy was the way Mary delivered her lines. It was like fingernails on a chalkboard at times.

Godfather and Godfather 2 both make my top 10 all-time favorites list and I've rewatched each of them more times than I can remember but I've never wanted to re-watch Godfather 3. I found it boring and irritating and even if they had tossed in a flashback sequence with more Appolonia nudity the movie would have still failed for me. And that's saying a lot as I thought she was absolutely stunning.

Steve