SECTION 11
vibraslap
This idea... is horrible.
Originally posted by SECTION 11
This idea... is horrible.
Originally posted by SECTION 11
lol, good stuff Shane.
But, back to this thread.....
Which is the bigger problem:
1) Slow 40 time? Ed brushed this off, then praised Mr. Peek for his blazing 40 time.
2) 19 whopping reps at 225? Note: That "skinny little weakling" Terrence Newman did 21. Or was it 24?
3) His fat signing bonus for playing exclusively on third down?
4) His fear of performing in front of NFL owners? That bodes well for road games in Dallas and San Fran...
5) His inability to avoid potentially bad off-field situations?
6) His putting on 12 pounds to get UP to 257 lbs?
7) His 24 sacks are exactly two better than Tom Burke's last year in college.
8) He's not Jevon Kearse, or Julius Pepper. He's a slow Dwight Freeney.
Originally posted by Ryanwb
He's a black Brad Ottis
Originally posted by MadCardDisease
I don't care if he did it in college, can he do it in the NFL.
Originally posted by Cbus cardsfan
Where do you think Freeney would've been drafted if he ran 4.8-4.9 40?I don't know how Ed can knock the pick of Leftwich.Let's see,we can have Drew Bledsoe or Regan Upshaw.Let's take UPshaw because we our pass rush is bad.Our pass rush is still going to be below average with or without Suggs,unless of course,Kyle Turley pops him on the head with a lead pipe.
Originally posted by Ed B
Oh wait, so Leftwich is a lock to turn into a star but Suggs is a lock to turn into a bust?
Are you kidding?
Originally posted by Cbus cardsfan
Where do you think Freeney would've been drafted if he ran 4.8-4.9 40?I don't know how Ed can knock the pick of Leftwich.Let's see,we can have Drew Bledsoe or Regan Upshaw.Let's take UPshaw because we our pass rush is bad.Our pass rush is still going to be below average with or without Suggs,unless of course,Kyle Turley pops him on the head with a lead pipe.
Originally posted by kerouac9
Look, I don't want to write about my Lock of the Draft again, and you don't want to read about my Lock of the Draft again. Please, please, please, please, please, please, please stop talking about how we should draft Leftwich. How many Super Bowls has Bledsoe played in and won?
Originally posted by Ed B
I guess there's no point in arguing if people are going to insist that a bad workout means a guy is going to be a bust.
I hate to sound like an officious prick but if you watch Terrell Suggs on the field and think he has no speed and don't see that he has one of the most complete arrays of pass rush moves ever, you simply don't know crap about football. Same with Rien Long. You take the workout guy, I'll take the guy who knows how to play football. Go ahead, call me an cornholio now.
And for the record, I think Byron Leftwich is a stud.
Originally posted by cheesebeef
Ed - you got to relax man - as far as I'm concerned, I wish we would take Leftwhich if he were there, but apparently we have our QB of the future with Josh - and I do like Suggs, but I would like him a hell of a lot more is his workout wasn't the failure that it was - 19 reps? 4.87 time - are you telling me that doesn't scare you even in the slightest bit? Come on now, there have been plenty of college studs who haven't amounted to **** in the pros - i hope that Suggs ain't one of them - well, if we draft him that is - otherwise the guy can suck as much as he wants.
Originally posted by SECTION 11
lol, good stuff Shane.
But, back to this thread.....
Which is the bigger problem:
1) Slow 40 time? Ed brushed this off, then praised Mr. Peek for his blazing 40 time.
2) 19 whopping reps at 225? Note: That "skinny little weakling" Terrence Newman did 21. Or was it 24?
Points 1 & 2 are the same thing in my mind. Great he had a piss poor personal work out, so your gonna bash him. Let me ask you a ??? if when he re-does his #'s he runs for a good 40 time and presses say 30 times, are you going to immediatly jump on the bandwagon and talk about how he's the greatest thing since sliced bread, and we should snag him if at all possible? Workout #'s mean diddly, its what you do on the field not off that we pay for.
3) His fat signing bonus for playing exclusively on third down?
Who says he's only playing 3rd down? You? Who made you the coach? Who's to say we get him and we dont make him an every down player?
4) His fear of performing in front of NFL owners? That bodes well for road games in Dallas and San Fran...
See workout thread above.
5) His inability to avoid potentially bad off-field situations?
Based on what I have heard of the situation, assuming what I have heard is true, I think 99.9% of the people on this board would do worse in that situation then he did. Only way he could have avoided the situation was to allow his cousin and the other guy to get into a big fight, and I dont see that as a good choice for option just to "avoid" a potentional bad off-field situation. He tried to play peacemaker and got smaked in the head with a piece of metal. Sucks to be him, but certainly not anywhere as bad as you are making it out to be.
6) His putting on 12 pounds to get UP to 257 lbs?
I think this has been gone over several times. Firstly there are alot of very good ends around 250lbs. So not worried about his weight.
7) His 24 sacks are exactly two better than Tom Burke's last year in college.
Without knowing the competition that Burke went against I can't argue this very well, but I will say much as I have stated in multiple Plummer threads, it's hard to compare players in different sitautitons based soley on thier stats.
8) He's not Jevon Kearse, or Julius Pepper. He's a slow Dwight Freeney.
Once again I assume you base that he is a slow Freeney based on his workout #'s. i know it cant be based on game study or film because Suggs is very fast,
Originally posted by Ed B
you know, you should try watching college football sometime, it's on Saturdays