The Tooth Fairy

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
So---with 12:49 in the 4th quarter with the Seahawks having just scored on Russell Wilson's 2nd TD pass to TE Jimmy Graham to make the score 22-10 Seattle---did any of you think it was time for the Cardinals to bring on the Tooth Fairy to try to overcome what had been a 3 quarter root canal for the Cardinals' offense?

I did. I found myself begging and pleading for the Tooth Fairy.

I thought of the Disney song and mantra that "dreams can come true---they can happen to you."

I thought it was the perfect time.

How sweet it would be to awaken on Friday morning with a 5-4 record.

For those of you who may have missed NBC's pre-game show, they had a clip of QB Blaine Gabbert dressed up as the Tooth Fairy (for having lost this week's Bucket Challenge) doing nifty footwork drills up and down the middle of the field.

With 12:49 left in the game, I thought to myself that if the Cardinals could just get a little smoother tempo in the passing game and just some added accuracy on their throws, with CB Richard Sherman out of the game and no Earl Thomas---they could do what the Redskins did to Seattle the previous week. Beat their secondary and pull the game out in the nick of time.

As it turns out---QB Drew Stanton, who had missed a handful of wide open receivers, which in three cases led to missed 3rd down conversions and 4th down punts---was limping for a good reason. He was nursing a sprained knee. The Cardinals' coaches, just as they had elected to put star RB David Johnson back into a game when Johnson had broken his wrist, stayed with the injured Stanton---and it backfired.

The Cardinals' answer to Wilson's TD was a 3 play -7 yard possession and yet another Andy Lee punt from deep in their own territory.

Stanton, despite his injured knee, tried like crazy on the final two possessions, but his coach shunned the two minute drill on the first of those possessions with less than 5 minutes left in the game, which made scoring on the last possession a relatively moot point...that is unless you can convert an on-side kick with 20 seconds left and successfully throw a Hail Mary.

Yesterday it was reported that Stanton's injury might cause him to miss one or two games---and that, if so, Blaine Gabbert will get the start in Houston.

Later it was reported that it's still a "wait and see" on Stanton and that if he can practice this week, he might not miss any time at all.

And so the Cardinals' QB tease continues...

Carson Palmer chimed in yesterday to assure everyone that he could make it back for the final two games.

But, as a long-time believer in fairy tales and in the critical importance of maintaining hope where dreams are concerned, I am going to say that Blaine Gabbert, by virtue of his sharp accuracy in the pre-season, especially going through his progressions (which surprised me), combined with his ability to escape a busted up pocket and score in the red zone with his feet, completely captured my imagination.

Yes...it was only the pre-season...but your eyes have to see it first in order to dream it---and what I saw gave me hope.

For a couple of years now, I have dreamed about what a mobile QB could do in BA's offense.

To me, I am totally on board with BA's spread 0 RB offense in passing situations---if the QB is mobile, but not if the QB is stationary. Look at the issues Aaron Rodgers or Russell Wilson present when they pass out of the spread. Teams either have to play zone coverage or they have to take a player out of their man coverage to spy on the QB, which likely means going with one safety, not two. And---good QBs can exploit single safety coverages left and right.

I like Gabbert's chances because he is mobile and he can extend plays. I don't know yet how tough he is under pressure within BA's system. He's had 7 offensive coordinators in 7 years, the first 6 of which were for losing teams that rarely won games.

For Gabbert the stars could align in Arizona. He has a supporting cast unlike any he's ever had. And he is playing for a coach who knows how to get receivers open on all three levels, short, intermediate and deep. In addition, he also gives that coach a dimension that the coach hasn't had for years (save Andrew Luck's rookie season)---a QB who can keep drives alive with his feet, which in today's NFL is a boon and pretty much a necessity, unless that QB is Tom Brady.

If Gabbert can take control at this critical time in the season, Gabbert might be the spark that gets the team on a roll and back into playoff contention.

Give the Tooth Fairy a chance. Maybe he can provide surprisingly shiny dividends and sweet mornings after.
 
Last edited:

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,583
Reaction score
15,846
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Stanton would be okay on a team with a stellar defense and great receivers and good running game. We have none of the above. Once in a while a QB has to put the team on his shoulders and go win a game. Stanton can't do that.

Gabbert might not be able to do it either with this current roster. However we NEED to find out if he is serviceable for next year. We cannot go into next year totally blind . Palmer might/will/could/should be gone next year and so should Stanton.

Hopefully we get the young QBOTF in the draft next year. Hopefully we have a guy in place that can steer the ship until the rookie is ready ala Trubisky or Watson. That being said I don't think BA would have the patience to live through a season while a young QB to learn and grow.That's why I'm hoping BA retires and we get a gut like Frank Reich in here. Very exciting to see what he has done with Carson Wentz.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,486
Reaction score
34,458
Location
Charlotte, NC
Mitch, the Cardinals didn't put Johnson back in with a dislocated wrist.

He dislocated on the play that he fumbled.
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
Mitch, the Cardinals didn't put Johnson back in with a dislocated wrist.

He dislocated on the play that he fumbled.

No, he broke it on the catch he made earlier in the game down inside the Lions' 10 yard line...he said he didn't realize it at the time because he had the wind knocked out of him and he was more concerned with regaining his breath. His fumble was partly the result of his injury.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,668
Location
CA
LOL. Blaineghazi is in full effect.
Stanton is plain garbage...he knows the system in and out and can barley muster a 50% completion ratio and can't make the throws required of him with any sense of accuracy or consistency. Yes, some of our WR's dropped easy ones.

At this point you have to kick the tires on Gabbert, injury or not. Being pragmatic does not equal fanboy.

This is what you get when a team is poo.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,367
Reaction score
29,732
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Stanton is plain garbage...he knows the system in and out and can barley muster a 50% completion ratio and can't make the throws required of him with any sense of accuracy or consistency. Yes, some of our WR's dropped easy ones.

At this point you have to kick the tires on Gabbert, injury or not. Being pragmatic does not equal fanboy.

This is what you get when a team is ****.
This team is fine! It’s on pace for the same record as last year’s team, and people convinced themselves that we were going to compete for the division this year!

There’s no reason to kick the tires on Gabbert. He’s had plenty of time to show what he is—a historically terrible starting QB. Stanton’s completion percentage is low because he throws every pass 15 yards downfield. If he dumped the ball off to Ellington for 4 yards on 3rd and 18, he could get his completion percentage up, too.
 

THESMEL

Smushdown! Take it like a fan!
Joined
May 21, 2010
Posts
5,963
Reaction score
1,154
Location
Vernon
Our offense is designed to outperform nfl defenses one dimensionally, so is feast or famine, we try to adjust to fundamentally sound football and we can’t - a paridigm shift is called for, few QBs will satisfy our system or fans, probably none can constantly. Dan Marino has limited success, Warren Moon too. But to win it all great passers in one dimensional system like Elway, Brady, Peyton Manning had to embrace a balanced offense. That’s why it’s better to build around a balanced offens3 and great defense and develop a pass game.
 

pmacLean

Veteran
Joined
Sep 22, 2016
Posts
477
Reaction score
332
Location
Halifax, NS
Yep, K9 hates Gabbert... no reason supplied except a lot of mumbo jumbo and personal loathing... tough poo, the rest of us want to see what he can do and we are not superficially dismissive until we actually SEE what he can do...
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,367
Reaction score
29,732
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Yep, K9 hates Gabbert... no reason supplied except a lot of mumbo jumbo and personal loathing... tough ****, the rest of us want to see what he can do and we are not superficially dismissive until we actually SEE what he can do...

For real? Because I’d like to see the Cards win a couple more games this season! Gabbert is not good! He’s bad—by basically every measure you can have as a professional QB.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,270
Reaction score
6,199
Location
Dallas, TX
I don't get the Gabbert luv. Sure he's more mobile, but he's not all that accurate either. Is he better than Stanton? Maybe, but not be much.

My friends, he's not the answer at winning a SB, he's just not that talented or has the intangibles to do it. Reality will soon set in
 

pmacLean

Veteran
Joined
Sep 22, 2016
Posts
477
Reaction score
332
Location
Halifax, NS
For real? Because I’d like to see the Cards win a couple more games this season! Gabbert is not good! He’s bad—by basically every measure you can have as a professional QB.

You have NO idea what Gabbert can or cannot do, neither do I. I just want to see it, is it there or not.
Somehow, you have amazing insight and knowledge and know exactly what anyone can do without even watching. Good for you. Glad you know everything.
 

dreday

Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Posts
187
Reaction score
70
I don't get the Gabbert luv. Sure he's more mobile, but he's not all that accurate either. Is he better than Stanton? Maybe, but not be much.

My friends, he's not the answer at winning a SB, he's just not that talented or has the intangibles to do it. Reality will soon set in

Yeah but would you like to see the 27 rerun of I Love Lucy where she works the assembly line of a chocolate factory or a new episode of Mark and Mindy?
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
34,929
Reaction score
21,023
Location
South Bay
You have NO idea what Gabbert can or cannot do, neither do I. I just want to see it, is it there or not.
Somehow, you have amazing insight and knowledge and know exactly what anyone can do without even watching. Good for you. Glad you know everything.

Gabbert has been in the NFL for seven seasons. This is third team in those seven seasons. He couldn't find a job as a third-string QB until two months after the start of free agency this season, and then signed for the veterans minimum with only $80k of that money guaranteed.

If you don't know by now that Gabbert is not a good quarterback, I'm not sure what else to tell you.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,367
Reaction score
29,732
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Stanton won a game one week ago tonight. I don’t understand the feeling that he gives us no chance.
 

nashman

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 3, 2007
Posts
10,825
Reaction score
7,854
Location
Queen Creek, AZ
I don't get the Gabbert luv. Sure he's more mobile, but he's not all that accurate either. Is he better than Stanton? Maybe, but not be much.

My friends, he's not the answer at winning a SB, he's just not that talented or has the intangibles to do it. Reality will soon set in

He has more intangibles than freaking Stanton, and he has shown he can be much more accurate than DS. Also throws a much more catchable ball imo. To want to watch Stanton pour his same garbage play on the field is just silly. An evaluation needs to be done on BG to see if we can finally get rid of Stanton even if BG just proves to be a backup chances are he is still better than DS!
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,462
Reaction score
7,631
He has more intangibles than freaking Stanton, and he has shown he can be much more accurate than DS. Also throws a much more catchable ball imo. To want to watch Stanton pour his same garbage play on the field is just silly. An evaluation needs to be done on BG to see if we can finally get rid of Stanton even if BG just proves to be a backup chances are he is still better than DS!
Please explain how you would have any idea what intangibles Gabbert does or does not possess? Same with Stanton?
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,432
Reaction score
7,371
Location
Chandler
This team is fine! It’s on pace for the same record as last year’s team, and people convinced themselves that we were going to compete for the division this year!

There’s no reason to kick the tires on Gabbert. He’s had plenty of time to show what he is—a historically terrible starting QB. Stanton’s completion percentage is low because he throws every pass 15 yards downfield. If he dumped the ball off to Ellington for 4 yards on 3rd and 18, he could get his completion percentage up, too.

If it weren't for the injuries we would be. The Cards have put 11 players on IR. Mostly starters. You act like we have our full roster active but just play like poo which isn't the case.
 

b8rtm8nn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
3,370
Reaction score
1,647
Location
Tucson
If Gabbert starts, we will probably come to the conclusion that he is effectively a younger Stanton.

BRING ON BARKLEY!!
 
Top