The Trade Winds Are Getting Stronger ..... Shaq to Cleveland ????

Wonder

Registered
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Posts
183
Reaction score
0
I don't think I'd trade him now that Porter is gone.

Remember Shaq is 2x better this year than last year, so it's the same Dantoni offense in a way with Gentry only we've added richardson, barbosa seems to have picked up some stronger game, and Shaq is much better physically, not to mention his FT's.
 

carey

VVVV Saints Fan VVVV
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Posts
2,071
Reaction score
4
Location
New Orleans
Update says a deal is not close and is very unlikely. Idk about Wallace in this offense.
 

carey

VVVV Saints Fan VVVV
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Posts
2,071
Reaction score
4
Location
New Orleans
Ben Wallace is owed 14 Million next year. So the Suns would save 6 million. I'm not sure this would put them under the LT or not. But the guy's production is pretty bad, 3.1 pts & 6 Reb in 24 minutes. He's also 34 years old.
 

Mr. Boldin

Mel Kiper's Daddy
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
1,634
Reaction score
284
If the Suns hold tight I think they could land Wally instead if the Cavs feel Shaq helps them for the next two seasons.

Ben Wallace's contract doesnt make much sense to take on, but moving Shaq would definitely make Amare happy and cuts payroll to make Sarver happy.
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
16,937
Reaction score
7,581
From Yahoo Sports
Shaq may be bound for Cleveland

By Adrian Wojnarowski and Johnny Ludden, Yahoo! Sports 6 hours, 7 minutes ago

The Phoenix Suns are discussing a potential trade with the Cleveland Cavaliers which would pair Shaquille O’Neal with LeBron James for a run at the NBA title, two NBA executives familiar with the talks said Thursday morning.
In return, the Cavaliers would send Ben Wallace and Sasha Pavlovic to the Suns.
No deal is imminent, but sources say the two teams have been talking about the potential trade for two days now. A Cavs official didn’t deny the talks but said the team was leaning against making a move.
NBA distributes financial warning The NBA sent out an ominous memo to its teams on the eve of the league’s trade deadline to outline dramatic projected drops in salary-cap and luxury-tax levels for the next two summers, Yahoo! Sports has learned.
Because of rapidly declining revenues, the league office delivered a sobering warning to teams trying to free cap space for the historic free-agent class of 2010: Owners and executives will likely have to strip more payroll than initially planned
.
Here is a (link) to the full text with a blurb about Stoudemire as well as other rumors around the league.

Both Wallace and Sasha have 2 years left on contract like Shaq, but their contracts total up to $19 million, a savings of $2 million from Shaq.
 
Last edited:

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
Boy, if CLE would give up Wally and Pavlovik, you have to do that deal financially. You'd save $19.5M next year PLUS the luxury tax implications of another $4M or so.

:thud:
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
16,937
Reaction score
7,581
Boy, if CLE would give up Wally and Pavlovik, you have to do that deal financially. You'd save $19.5M next year PLUS the luxury tax implications of another $4M or so.

:thud:

Wally and Pavlovic for Shaq would leave us terribly thin up front. We had better hope Sims has some game. We'd almost have to take back Wallace instead.
 

HooverDam

Registered User
Joined
May 21, 2005
Posts
6,560
Reaction score
0
This seems odd from the Cavs point of view, what would they do with Big Z? Shaq won't ride the pine and I can't imagine you starting them both. Weird.

EDIT: Also I'd wonder if the Suns could get Darnell Jackson back in the deal to help with front court depth. Talent wise the Suns are getting hosed in this deal and really helping the Cavs, so Kerr should push for Clevelands 2010 1st rounder since Kerr so foolishly got rid of our own.
 
Last edited:

TheKid_1

Registered
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Posts
401
Reaction score
0
This seems odd from the Cavs point of view, what would they do with Big Z? Shaq won't ride the pine and I can't imagine you starting them both. Weird.

Well they do start both Big Z and Big Ben right now, so who knows...
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,305
Reaction score
11,932
Boy, if CLE would give up Wally and Pavlovik, you have to do that deal financially. You'd save $19.5M next year PLUS the luxury tax implications of another $4M or so.

:thud:

Sarver of all people went on the air and said that the Suns don't have to make anymore salary cutting moves THIS year. Next year we will definitely have to.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,557
Reaction score
9,849
Location
L.A. area
Bad idea for the Suns. They need O'Neal's ability to score, and Wallace is a worse free-throw shooter than O'Neal has ever been.
 

Ryanwb

ASFN IDOL
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
35,576
Reaction score
6
Location
Mesa
Not ghona happen

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
16,937
Reaction score
7,581
Sarver of all people went on the air and said that the Suns don't have to make anymore salary cutting moves THIS year. Next year we will definitely have to.

What could we do next year aside from trading Barbosa to a team with cap space? Expiring contracts that we get in the offseason will be no more beneficial than Shaq's. We have a team option on Nash. Maybe we can exercise it and extend him two or three years at a contract comparable to an MLE so he can recoop the $13 million that he is slated to make next year. It's going to be interesting.
 
Last edited:

Caliballfan

Rookie
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Posts
54
Reaction score
0
if Shaq has a say in this trade...he will most likely say no because he doesn't like playing in the cold climate lol. I know it sounds utterly ridiculous but its true, being a shaq fan I can say he has always wanted to play in warm destinations.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,806
Reaction score
15,910
Location
Arizona
Supposedly the latest is that this rumored deal is actually a 3 way deal with a yet undisclosed team because Cleveland does not have the pieces to make a trade happen. Meaning that it probably adds credibility to Sarvers stance that he will not trade players just to shed salary this season.

If Shaq goes...IMO....it's to get some young players or talent back this year.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,594
Posts
5,437,210
Members
6,330
Latest member
Trainwreck20
Top