Things I Think I’ve Learned

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,712
Reaction score
14,477
Location
Chandler, Az
I already agree in this thread about Allen. We should have kept him.

Watt was a phenomenal player, but again, he only played 7 games that year and when we needed him, he went down. We payed over $20 million a year to a player who had major injury issues and are still paying him with dead money. Hes really not a great example.

And who this off season was a Watt type player without the injury history? Was there a single player that could offer that type of impact on defense? The only ones I can think of were franchised or re-signed prior to the start of FA. Jonathan Greenard at $20 million doesn't move the needle, IMHO, enough to make this defense special, especially given hes missed 18 games in 4 years.

I wish we had signed more impact players, but not wasting $20 million on one player isn't an issue for me.

Anytime you can get a future hall of famer like Watt you do it. He is everything you want in a player. Elite Talent. Great Locker Room Guy. Awesome in the community. It was a no brainer.
 

bankybruce

All In!
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,208
Reaction score
27,400
Location
Nowhere
Anytime you can get a future hall of famer like Watt you do it. He is everything you want in a player. Elite Talent. Great Locker Room Guy. Awesome in the community. It was a no brainer.
But who was JJ Watt this offseason?
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,406
Reaction score
14,510
The difference between $10 million and $14 million is hardly trivial.
With 130M in salary, and tens of millions in endorsements, I doubt money was the main factor. Even if it were a factor, it's hard to imagine the Cards paying a huge premium - he wasn't overpaid at 14 per.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,323
Reaction score
29,643
Location
Gilbert, AZ
With 130M in salary, and tens of millions in endorsements, I doubt money was the main factor. Even if it were a factor, it's hard to imagine the Cards paying a huge premium - he wasn't overpaid at 14 per.
It’s always the main factor in your last contract
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,656
Reaction score
10,524
No, ruining your cap for expensive free agent acquisitions is bad management in our position and this scenario. None of those moves would have ruined our cap or come close to it.
Only because you are thinking about it for this season in isolation. Unless we are doing a one year signing it will effect us for multiple years.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,660
Reaction score
23,658
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Only because you are thinking about it for this season in isolation. Unless we are doing a one year signing it will effect us for multiple years.
And you can creatively frontload contracts. It's done quite often...by other teams. It's more cash up front, though, and Dollar Bill's son doesn't like those kinds of deals.
 
Top