in all honesty, I have no idea why Fitz would do this. NE has shown the ability to put a winner on the field consistently when Tom has given them a break. We've shown an inability to much of anything to put a winner on the field, so if I'm Fitz, I'm pretty damn reluctant to give up a ton of money to give back to a team that's shown no idea what to do with it.
While I agree that the Cardinals have shown the ability to put a consistent winner on the field, it doesn't change the fact that Fitzgerald's deal will become very restrictive starting next year. He has already received two top market deals prior to his current contract and if Fitz is "all about winning" as he says he is, it is something the team will need to bring up with him.
The nice thing that I believe we will see over the next two years is the exiting of players like Colledge, Bradley, Kolb, and Sendlein/Snyder. Getting rid of these deals will go along way to freeing up space as well. Especially when we will need to extend Sam Acho and Patrick Peterson in the next two years as well. I am curious to see how the new regime handles Andre Roberts when his contract expires and what his demands will be. It is funny, but with Campbell, Fitzgerald, and Washington all on long term contracts, I don't see any other vital players to re-sign other than Acho and Peterson. Dan Williams, Andre Roberts, Chris Wells, O'Brian Schofield, and Anthony Sherman are all very replaceable players if they demand too much.