Trey gets paid

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
65,497
Reaction score
61,187
Location
SoCal
Have a bit more time to explain.

You are actually missing the point with this rant. Calm DOWN ;)

The large amount of cap space is by design from Monti. The cap space could easily have been reduced if Monti had structured especially Sweat's and McBride's contracts evenly/normal. Monti chose to structure both backloaded to ease the cap impact this year. Sweat's cap hit this year is crazy low compared to the contract size.

So the question is, what is he keeping it for? Because he clearly is creating more cap room than he had to.
Which would be idiotic if there’s no additional shoe to drop.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,589
Reaction score
2,825
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
The annual “we’re holding 20 million in cap space because the other shoe is going drop” narrative is comical at this point.
And this comment is comical because you do not understand the cap when you state something like this.

Monti has created this cap space on purpose for this year. Josh Sweat signed a 76M with 38M guaranteed. Cap hit this season - 7.3M. That is by design.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,486
Reaction score
12,307
The annual “we’re holding 20 million in cap space because the other shoe is going drop” narrative is comical at this point.

Which would be idiotic if there’s no additional shoe to drop.
Monti has had one of the best free agency periods of all time for the Cards.

Some people always want more... and then some people cheat on Beyonce.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,486
Reaction score
12,307
A little presumptuous to say this before they’ve played a game, amirite?
I don't think so. You can win in free agency by doing what you can at that time to make your team better. If one of our players blows out an ankle, it wouldn't mean he didn't swing for the fences and also it wasn't the right call.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,589
Reaction score
2,825
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
A little presumptuous to say this before they’ve played a game, amirite?
Less presumptuous than concluding on Monti’s off-season after the first of 5 waves of the off-season to build a team.

But huge compliment for a hilarious post :thumbup:

There is probably 50+ post from you concluding negatively on Monti’s actions. All okay to conclude there, BUT any positive view…Too early to conclude. Briliant!
 
Last edited:

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
41,144
Reaction score
26,251
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
And this comment is comical because you do not understand the cap when you state something like this.

Monti has created this cap space on purpose for this year. Josh Sweat signed a 76M with 38M guaranteed. Cap hit this season - 7.3M. That is by design.
So if he never spends it, you will agree about the stupidity of saving it and nail Monti for it?
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,589
Reaction score
2,825
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
So if he never spends it, you will agree about the stupidity of saving it and nail Monti for it?
If he is saving and not using it at all. Obviously stupid.

But creating cap space to make more signings or a future trade possible. Not stupid even if it doesn’t happen.

Because I assume that the remaining cap space will be used like last season - guaranteed money for budda, Conner and Fro in order to lower the impact on the following year’s cap.
 
Last edited:

BigDavis75

Making a Comeback
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,552
Location
Amherst, MA
Tomlinson has two void years with ‘27 being sizable. How much cap space can we roll over this year? Would be frustrating to have unused space that could have taken on some or all of those void years.
 
Last edited:

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,545
Reaction score
32,506
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I don't think so. You can win in free agency by doing what you can at that time to make your team better. If one of our players blows out an ankle, it wouldn't mean he didn't swing for the fences and also it wasn't the right call.

Of course it does. This is a results-based business. You don’t get credit for coming up short or trying hard (no matter how many times people bring up how hard he tried to sign William and/or Freis).


Less presumptuous than concluding on Monti’s off-season after the first of 5 waves of the off-season to build a team.

But huge compliment for a hilarious post :thumbup:

There is probably 50+ post from you concluding negatively on Monti’s actions. All okay to conclude there, BUT any positive view…Too early to conclude. Briliant!
I didn’t do that and still haven’t. I’ve actually been pretty measured this offseason. My expectations were low because the free agent class was bad. I’m not complaining about not spending money.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,486
Reaction score
12,307
Of course it does. This is a results-based business. You don’t get credit for coming up short or trying hard (no matter how many times people bring up how hard he tried to sign William and/or Freis).
Except that's not what happened this free agency. He landed a top 5 free agent for the first time in this franchise's history, and that players was our greatest need. He also filled in some other major holes and re-signed our best player on offense.

But sure, go ahead and criticize because he didn't land all of his targets. Steph Curry I guess has a bad night when he only shoots 8/10 from the arc as well.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,545
Reaction score
32,506
Location
Gilbert, AZ
He landed a top 5 free agent for the first time in this franchise's history, and that players was our greatest need.
lol. Cmon.

You don’t get credit for shrewdly making a player the highest-paid at his position a full year before he reaches free agency.

This is truly deranged early apologist stuff for a guy who has shrewdly guided this team to a 12-22 record.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,486
Reaction score
12,307
lol. Cmon.

You don’t get credit for shrewdly making a player the highest-paid at his position a full year before he reaches free agency.

This is truly deranged early apologist stuff for a guy who has shrewdly guided this team to a 12-22 record.
Show me where I am wrong. Show me another time where the Cards landed a top 5 player in free agency.

I'll wait.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,545
Reaction score
32,506
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Show me where I am wrong. Show me another time where the Cards landed a top 5 player in free agency.

I'll wait.
Obviously “top 5 player in free agency” isn’t an objective metric. You’ll just disagree smugly.

Mike Iupati was a highly regarded free agent signing. Jared Veldheer also. As was Edge James. Both were wildly more accomplished than Josh Sweat.

Making the best choice from the McDonalds menu is I guess a thing to celebrate?
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
65,497
Reaction score
61,187
Location
SoCal
And this comment is comical because you do not understand the cap when you state something like this.

Monti has created this cap space on purpose for this year. Josh Sweat signed a 76M with 38M guaranteed. Cap hit this season - 7.3M. That is by design.
Cheese’s point is we see the claim that the front office has something up their sleeve every year and usually nothing comes to fruition. It’s like an annual rite. So yeah, it SEEMS like that may be the case given monti’s structuring of the contract, but it’s certainly not a given. And if it nothing else emerges then we just waste cap space this season and unnecessarily constrain future season’s cap space, no?
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
65,497
Reaction score
61,187
Location
SoCal
Monti has had one of the best free agency periods of all time for the Cards.

Some people always want more... and then some people cheat on Beyonce.
You clearly didn’t understand my comment. It wasn’t saying he did a bad job with the off season. I think he did a good job thus far. It’s commenting on structuring contracts to fail to take advantage of the cap space this season, unnecessarily constraining our cap space in subsequent seasons, if he’s not gearing up for additional signings this season. The notorious and proverbial “other shoe.”
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,545
Reaction score
32,506
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Cheese’s point is we see the claim that the front office has something up their sleeve every year and usually nothing comes to fruition. It’s like an annual rite. So yeah, it SEEMS like that may be the case given monti’s structuring of the contract, but it’s certainly not a given. And if it nothing else emerges then we just waste cap space this season and unnecessarily constrain future season’s cap space, no?
Surely the great pumpkin will arrive this year
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
41,144
Reaction score
26,251
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
If he is saving and not using it at all. Obviously stupid.

But creating cap space to make more signings or a future trade possible. Not stupid even if it doesn’t happen.

Because I assume that the remaining cap space will be used like last season - guaranteed money for budda, Conner and Fro in order to lower the impact on the following year’s cap.
Yep, I figured there was an out. There's the out. You don't get points for trying. If you saved your powder only to not fire a shot, you don't get credit.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
41,144
Reaction score
26,251
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Cheese’s point is we see the claim that the front office has something up their sleeve every year and usually nothing comes to fruition. It’s like an annual rite. So yeah, it SEEMS like that may be the case given monti’s structuring of the contract, but it’s certainly not a given. And if it nothing else emerges then we just waste cap space this season and unnecessarily constrain future season’s cap space, no?
Exactly.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,589
Reaction score
2,825
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
Yep, I figured there was an out. There's the out. You don't get points for trying. If you saved your powder only to not fire a shot, you don't get credit.
And no credit for making up narratives that are not there.

Credit for trying? WTF are you talking about?

The question here is simple:
Would you have preferred Monti to make more even contract and used up the cap already?

Or

Do you like the flexibility Monti has created to add more player or try to trade for someone?

Just answer your preference?
 
Top