JeffGollin
ASFN Icon
It's hard to say that anyone on that list is a reach since little seperates #7-#13.
Faulty premise.
A draft rating number is just that - an arbitrary number a scouting service came up with so that they could rank players "as they viewed them."
What the rating number doesn't tell you includes: (a) a player's upside, (b) his downside risk, (c) his "fit" re a particular team & its system or (d) how specific teams rate him on their boards (i.e. Scouts Inc. may rate three guys a 95, but Team A might rate one guy a 96, another a 95 and the other an 88. Team B might rate all three guys just the opposite. Team C could rate all three guys really really low or really really high). Scouts Inc. and other rating services are useful in helping us determine where a particular player might generally be ranked, but their ratings aren't "end alls"/only "directional sign posts".
Therefore, stating that one guy either does or doesn't represent a "reach" only reflects only for example, what Todd McShay or Gary Horton thinks about a player - and not necessarily what Rod Graves thinks.
Personally, I think there's a value dropoff after #8 or #9. Scouts Inc. and the War Room no doubt think differently. We don't know how RG and DG view the top 15.
Faulty premise.
A draft rating number is just that - an arbitrary number a scouting service came up with so that they could rank players "as they viewed them."
What the rating number doesn't tell you includes: (a) a player's upside, (b) his downside risk, (c) his "fit" re a particular team & its system or (d) how specific teams rate him on their boards (i.e. Scouts Inc. may rate three guys a 95, but Team A might rate one guy a 96, another a 95 and the other an 88. Team B might rate all three guys just the opposite. Team C could rate all three guys really really low or really really high). Scouts Inc. and other rating services are useful in helping us determine where a particular player might generally be ranked, but their ratings aren't "end alls"/only "directional sign posts".
Therefore, stating that one guy either does or doesn't represent a "reach" only reflects only for example, what Todd McShay or Gary Horton thinks about a player - and not necessarily what Rod Graves thinks.
Personally, I think there's a value dropoff after #8 or #9. Scouts Inc. and the War Room no doubt think differently. We don't know how RG and DG view the top 15.
Last edited: