Victory #500 for the Cardinals' as a franchise??

NeverSayDieFan

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 13, 2004
Posts
2,864
Reaction score
210
Can anyone confirm this? I thought I heard/read it somewhere during the week. If so, what a memorable way to get there! :)

GO CARDS! Mark in SC :)

FAN OF THE STILL, I SAY, STILL, UNDEFEATED ARIZONA CARDINALS!! :D
 

BigRedFan

Registered
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Posts
1,114
Reaction score
2
They were 499-699 coming into this game. So win 500 just beat loss 700!
 

TheCardinal

Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Posts
462
Reaction score
538
I ran the numbers quickly from my website's alltime results. There is some uncertainty in the games from the early 1920s in terms of which ones counted as league games. I compiled that list awhile back based on numerous sources and are accurate as best as I can tell. If I include the 1944 Card-Pitt combine (0-10) and postseason (6-7) I get 503-695-38 alltime. There is also the "playoff bowl" game in the 1960s which we won over GB (which I didn't count as it was not an advancing playoff format, just a postseason "exhibition"). Looks like win #500 might have been against Seattle.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,451
Reaction score
40,020
Location
Las Vegas
Whats amazing that as old as this franchise is that Whiz has about 1/10 of them in his short tenure! Love me some Whiz!
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Whats amazing that as old as this franchise is that Whiz has about 1/10 of them in his short tenure! Love me some Whiz!

Don't forget the people responsible for the Cardinals getting their own stadium. The money and fan support it has generated has made a huge difference.
 

52brandon

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 30, 2011
Posts
3,407
Reaction score
0
Don't forget the people responsible for the Cardinals getting their own stadium. The money and fan support it has generated has made a huge difference.
huge is an understatement. IMO, the new stadium is mostly responsible for it. Looks like "cheap" Bowtie Bill held up his end of the bargain when the state held up theirs. He always said he'd spend the $$$ as promised if he got the stadium as promised. The stadium is amazing, people actually like being there (unlike SDS), so it of course is going to help create and retain a good crowd for the home team (SDS had a LOT more opposing fans. Likely because they all only had to attend 1 game a year). Better crowd leads to better environment for the team which leads to better performance which leads to players actually WANTING to be here and it all snowballs into what we have today. It's that butterfly effect
 

BigRedFan

Registered
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Posts
1,114
Reaction score
2
The 499-799 is from pro football reference.com, and is only regular season games.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
huge is an understatement. IMO, the new stadium is mostly responsible for it. Looks like "cheap" Bowtie Bill held up his end of the bargain when the state held up theirs. He always said he'd spend the $$$ as promised if he got the stadium as promised. The stadium is amazing, people actually like being there (unlike SDS), so it of course is going to help create and retain a good crowd for the home team (SDS had a LOT more opposing fans. Likely because they all only had to attend 1 game a year). Better crowd leads to better environment for the team which leads to better performance which leads to players actually WANTING to be here and it all snowballs into what we have today. It's that butterfly effect

Former players have said that the lack of fan support at SDS adversely affected their play.
 

TheCardinal

Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Posts
462
Reaction score
538
Re-did my math (this time with a calculator!) and got 497-699-38 counting only regular-season games. The discrepancy is in the 1920 season, where the profootball reference site includes four games against teams not in the league, and not listed in their 14-team league standings for that season (Moline Univeral Tra, Cincinnati Celts, Lansing Oldsmobile, and Chicago Stayms, against whom we went 3-0-1). Back then it was common to play non-league "exhibition" opponents during the season and wouldn't count in the standings (but would count for $$$). I'm not sure why those games are included, or if they even should be. . . I have seen that season's record listed both ways, as 6-2-2 and 3-2-1 depending on who you ask.
 

Big Deal

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Posts
1,633
Reaction score
81
The 499-799 is from pro football reference.com, and is only regular season games.


Also from pro football reference is that we are the 9th team all time to reach the 500 win mark.
 

TheCardinal

Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Posts
462
Reaction score
538
Looks like we're closing fast on Detroit (507) and St. Louis (515)!

Unfortunately, only the Lions have scored their 600th loss (602) making our record well out of reach. . . and only Tampa Bay has a worse winning percentage.
 

52brandon

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 30, 2011
Posts
3,407
Reaction score
0
Looks like we're closing fast on Detroit (507) and St. Louis (515)!

Unfortunately, only the Lions have scored their 600th loss (602) making our record well out of reach. . . and only Tampa Bay has a worse winning percentage.
good to know. Now when my friends from DET bitch about being perennial losers, I can throw that in their face and ask them politely to SHUT UP :p
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
This team is 100 years old


so we average 5 wins per year





ouch lol
 

TheCardinal

Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Posts
462
Reaction score
538
These records only go back to the start of the NFL (1920) and don't count the Cardinals games going back to 1898. Also, they played a variable number of games each season. With that winning percentage, it would be more like 6-9-1. Better, but still not great.
 

52brandon

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 30, 2011
Posts
3,407
Reaction score
0
Former players suckitude adversely affected my support.
like I said in my post, it's a cycle. Fans don't wanna cook in the hot sun to watch their team get crushed every week. Empty stands, or filled with opposing jerseys is demoralizing as a player. Empty stands also mean less $$$. It's a cycle. Luckily today that cycle is spinning the other direction. So fans are happy because the team wins, players are happy the team wins and have the fans' support, owners are happy to get the $$$ and in turn spend the $$$ to continue to build on the success and attract more fans, etc. It was a depressing thing to watch in the 90s, and is a beautiful thing to watch today
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
like I said in my post, it's a cycle. Fans don't wanna cook in the hot sun to watch their team get crushed every week. Empty stands, or filled with opposing jerseys is demoralizing as a player. Empty stands also mean less $$$. It's a cycle. Luckily today that cycle is spinning the other direction. So fans are happy because the team wins, players are happy the team wins and have the fans' support, owners are happy to get the $$$ and in turn spend the $$$ to continue to build on the success and attract more fans, etc. It was a depressing thing to watch in the 90s, and is a beautiful thing to watch today

Yep.

<------season ticket holder 88-99.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
like I said in my post, it's a cycle. Fans don't wanna cook in the hot sun to watch their team get crushed every week. Empty stands, or filled with opposing jerseys is demoralizing as a player. Empty stands also mean less $$$. It's a cycle. Luckily today that cycle is spinning the other direction. So fans are happy because the team wins, players are happy the team wins and have the fans' support, owners are happy to get the $$$ and in turn spend the $$$ to continue to build on the success and attract more fans, etc. It was a depressing thing to watch in the 90s, and is a beautiful thing to watch today

From 1973 to 1991 the Green Bay Packers only had 3 winning seasons. They sold out every year. The Redskins have made the playoffs only 3 times in the last 20 years. They have thousands of people on their season ticket waiting list.

Fair weather fans make me sick.
 

52brandon

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 30, 2011
Posts
3,407
Reaction score
0
From 1973 to 1991 the Green Bay Packers only had 3 winning seasons. They sold out every year. The Redskins have made the playoffs only 3 times in the last 20 years. They have thousands of people on their season ticket waiting list.

Fair weather fans make me sick.
it's because they were all good at some point (especially GB). And have been there forever. They have generations of life-long fans (again, especially GB, hell, they're owned by the town). The "Arizona Cardinals" are still a relatively young team, and were especially so in SDS. That stadium SUCKED too. Everything about the AZ Cardinals in UofP Stadium is 180 degrees from the SDS PHX Cardinals. Don't be surprised if 20 years from now we have the same devoted following as those teams. Respect isn't given, it's earned
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,451
Reaction score
40,020
Location
Las Vegas
it's because they were all good at some point (especially GB). And have been there forever. They have generations of life-long fans (again, especially GB, hell, they're owned by the town). The "Arizona Cardinals" are still a relatively young team, and were especially so in SDS. That stadium SUCKED too. Everything about the AZ Cardinals in UofP Stadium is 180 degrees from the SDS PHX Cardinals. Don't be surprised if 20 years from now we have the same devoted following as those teams. Respect isn't given, it's earned

The cards have been in the valley for 24 years. I was an Instant convert at age 14. I can only imagine the amount of other converts as soon as the team arrived. sDS was rocking that first year on the valley. Then you add in the sheer droves of kids that were younger and didnt get into football yet and then all the natives born since 1988 etc.... There should be no problem with #s being there to support the team without question. Like I said in other thread its embarrassing to see so many empty seats so clearly empty in the middle of our stadium on TV. It looks awful. I understand that they are club seats and expensuve. But you will never convince me that there isn't money in AZ even with the economy where its at. Plenty of stadiums and cities in economic downturn and you dont see an empty seat in the house. Just think how much louder that place is with an extra 6 to 8 thousand fans screaming that close to field level. AZ fans are just fickle. Always have been. Always will be. Sucks.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
555,959
Posts
5,430,689
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top