- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Posts
- 5,710
- Reaction score
- 754
I think Howard is valuable because he can do everything similar to Gronk. I'm not saying that he will be that type of player, but he has that type of versatility. Also, in a draft class so deep at CB, I would argue that the gap between Howard and the next best TE is bigger than the gap between the best CB and the 3rd or 4th best CB.
If you are of the mind that the offense was the 2nd biggest issue in 2016 after special teams, and your priority tis to improve the offense, I don't see many players better suited to do so more than OJ Howard.
In the 1st round, I believe in BPA balanced with need. IMO, thats easily CB - Quincy Wilson. And I disagree in terms of taking a CB later. If you have the opportunity to have 2 elite #1 CB's, you take it. We already are currently gambling with our #2 CB depth. Just take the sure thing (Quincy) and move on.
In the overall strategy of the draft, I agree that offense should be priority. With that said, I dont feel drafting a TE improves our offense nearly as much as a WR or G. Both found, along with TE, in later rounds. As soon as round 2 if youd like, but not #13 overall.
I am not opposed to drafting a TE, but certainly not round 1. Let me ask you this, how many TEs in the NFL today would you draft #13 overall? Gronk, maybe Jimmy Graham......maybe Travis Kelce but thats stretching it.......I cant think of any more. Theres almost no such thing as an elite TE in todays NFL.