Week 9 Snap Counts and Thoughts

OP
OP
Chopper0080

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,342
Reaction score
40,460
Location
Colorado
Different format this week. PFRs snap counts weren't up so going to use this one.

Big RB distribution. Conner 48% and then Benson really subbed for him getting 28%. Emari getting some 2 minute and pass down work 24%.

WRs with low usage due to script. Wilson and MHJ both around 70%.

90% 50% 43% is why the WRs got very little work. McBride, Reiman, and Higg. Again, this is what a dominant win probably looks like consistently moving forward.

Apparently no offensive line...I will see if I can find that.
 

CFLredzoned

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Posts
1,703
Reaction score
1,305
Location
Melbourne, FL
Different format this week. PFRs snap counts weren't up so going to use this one.

Big RB distribution. Conner 48% and then Benson really subbed for him getting 28%. Emari getting some 2 minute and pass down work 24%.

WRs with low usage due to script. Wilson and MHJ both around 70%.

90% 50% 43% is why the WRs got very little work. McBride, Reiman, and Higg. Again, this is what a dominant win probably looks like consistently moving forward.

Apparently no offensive line...I will see if I can find that.

I like the format. It's pretty cool to see how some of the young guys have trended.
 
OP
OP
Chopper0080

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,342
Reaction score
40,460
Location
Colorado
Defensively.

Stille and Stills paced the DL room with being the only two over 50%.

Pappoe got a bunch of work 51%. and not at the expense of White or Wilson. White got 94% and Wilson got 71%. A little bit of a new wrinkle. Maybe to get more speed on the field.

PLayed a lot of nickel. Melton played 100%. ST5 94%. GWill 86%.
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,406
Reaction score
28,058
Location
Nowhere
Interesting they have Collier listed at edge. Xavier with the second most snaps and an increase over last week. If we trade for someone, that will go down. But we seems to make the most of his snaps. Hopefully the light is coming in.

I made a joke last night he'd end up leading all rookies in sacks by the end of the season with the leader only having 2.5 sacks. The leader could win with 5. What a poor draft for edge!
 
OP
OP
Chopper0080

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,342
Reaction score
40,460
Location
Colorado
Interesting they have Collier listed at edge. Xavier with the second most snaps and an increase over last week. If we trade for someone, that will go down. But we seems to make the most of his snaps. Hopefully the light is coming in.

I made a joke last night he'd end up leading all rookies in sacks by the end of the season with the leader only having 2.5 sacks. The leader could win with 5. What a poor draft for edge!
Verse is killing it with pressures but hasn't been able to convert them. That should change.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,466
Location
Charlotte, NC
Verse is killing it with pressures but hasn't been able to convert them. That should change.
I'm becoming less and less excited about pressures when I learned how pressures are tracked now. The NFL has chips on each player and a "pressure" is registered when a QB is 2.5 yards away from a defender. So it's not too reliable, though it does mean that a defender is often getting close to the QB
 
OP
OP
Chopper0080

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,342
Reaction score
40,460
Location
Colorado
I'm becoming less and less excited about pressures when I learned how pressures are tracked now. The NFL has chips on each player and a "pressure" is registered when a QB is 2.5 yards away from a defender. So it's not too reliable, though it does mean that a defender is often getting close to the QB
Still fine for me. I want tight pockets and QBs feeling rushed. Sacks are the cherry on top. I look at the pressures rankings and it looks like it is highlighting players correctly.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,798
Reaction score
14,744
Location
Chandler, Az
I'm becoming less and less excited about pressures when I learned how pressures are tracked now. The NFL has chips on each player and a "pressure" is registered when a QB is 2.5 yards away from a defender. So it's not too reliable, though it does mean that a defender is often getting close to the QB
Almost only counts in horseshoes and handgrenades.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,466
Location
Charlotte, NC
Still fine for me. I want tight pockets and QBs feeling rushed. Sacks are the cherry on top. I look at the pressures rankings and it looks like it is highlighting players correctly.
But here is a scenario where the stat becomes more junky....let's say a QB rolls out and is now 2.5 yards away from Verse. That would register as a "pressure" when it's not.

An I'm a Verse fan, I think he's going to be a good player for a long time.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,681
Posts
5,410,697
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top