SirStefan32
Krycek, Alex Krycek
It's a shame he is an idiot. I love his defense and energy. I was so high on Jackson when we drafted him, and he shows what he can do from time to time, but he just keeps doing stupid stuff on and off the court.
His option for next season was picked up last offseason. We have until the end of October to pick up his 4th year option, which I remember hearing previously was the plan. I think that was right after the arrest. Of course things look worse now and they may have changed their minds but I think not picking up his 4th year option would be a mistake, in that it would hurt what little trade value he has and also if he's retained for next season then we shouldn't be in a better position should the light come on for him. Using the stretch provision on him, if necessary, would lower his cap hit to just about $2.5 million a year.
It's a shame he is an idiot. I love his defense and energy. I was so high on Jackson when we drafted him, and he shows what he can do from time to time, but he just keeps doing stupid stuff on and off the court.
I hate to give up on Jackson. Maybe Monty and staff can get him settled down. I still have this fantasy he can play power forward someday on a consistent basis.
He definitely has the skill. If he can put on a few pounds and stop doing stupid stuff, he could turn into a Green-type player who can shoot a bit better. I was very happy with Jackson after the All-Star break.
The Suns' best chance is to find someone willing to take Jackson without sending any salary back. Good luck with that one. Otherwise, they've put themselves in no-man's land: too far under the cap to have a competitive roster, but not far enough under it to get a difference maker.
In related news, Hakim Warrick is available. He's about to turn 37 and played in the G-League last season.
Totally agree. No salary back deal is what is needed.
P.S. What about Horacio Llamas? I hear he is only 45 and we could use some good will across the border.
If Baynes really doesn’t want to be here I predict that there are a few teams out there with trade exceptions or cap space that would gladly take him. 5 million for a contributing back up center is a decent deal.
It seems pretty clear to me that he is saying it's 3m in that scenario.I really appreciate Coon and his FAQ, but it mystifies me that he's unwilling to give a straightforward answer to this question. Is the answer $5 million or $3 million? Stop with the mumbo-jumbo about "guaranteed amounts," just give a number.
It seems pretty clear to me that he is saying it's 3m in that scenario.
Okay let me rephrase. It seems completely obvious to me that he is saying 3m.I agree that it "seems pretty clear." But if he actually said $3 million, it would be very clear. Why give a probably-maybe-clear answer when it's just as easy to be decisive?
I really appreciate Coon and his FAQ, but it mystifies me that he's unwilling to give a straightforward answer to this question. Is the answer $5 million or $3 million? Stop with the mumbo-jumbo about "guaranteed amounts," just give a number.
Okay let me rephrase. It seems completely obvious to me that he is saying 3m.
Except for the fact that he is not. Over the past two seasons he averaged over 17 minutes a game for one of the top teams in the east. That is literally the definition of a contributing back up center.Except he really is not much of a contributor. He is basically Pat Burke...
@Hoop Head
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
He hasn't responded to my tweet(where I ask for additional clarification about a $0 buyout) but here you go.
I'm confident complete forfeiture of the contract is an option due to the examples give regarding John Starks trade to the Bulls that required legal arbitration but I'm not 100%.
Except for the fact that he is not. Over the past two seasons he averaged over 17 minutes a game for one of the top teams in the east. That is literally the definition of a contributing back up center.
If he was entirely unproductive in the 17 minutes he wouldn’t be playing 17 minutes for a playoff contender. His PER last season was over 14. That is far from unproductive. If he was your starter then you may have a point, but as a backup he is as solid as they come.Not if he was entirely unproductive in those 17 minutes per game.
If he was entirely unproductive in the 17 minutes he wouldn’t be playing 17 minutes for a playoff contender. His PER last season was over 14. That is far from unproductive. If he was your starter then you may have a point, but as a backup he is as solid as they come.
Exactly. If Holmes was on a one year 5 million dollar contract then he would be easy to trade as well. Do you think Holmes is going to sign a 1 year 5 million dollar contract this offseason?You know a team has fallen on hard times when fans look at a below-average PER of 14 as a positive...
Meanwhile, take a look at what Holmes's PER was, and tell me with a straight face that Baynes is an upgrade.
I really appreciate Coon and his FAQ, but it mystifies me that he's unwilling to give a straightforward answer to this question. Is the answer $5 million or $3 million? Stop with the mumbo-jumbo about "guaranteed amounts," just give a number.
Exactly. If Holmes was on a one year 5 million dollar contract then he would be easy to trade as well. Do you think Holmes is going to sign a 1 year 5 million dollar contract this offseason?
That’s not a 1 year 5 million dollar contract is it? I will say what I said at the beginning. If we want to trade Baynes we could easily do it. 1 year 5 million for a backup center is not unreasonable.I certainly don't think it will be more than the MLE. And yes, I believe 4 years, 20 million, is a realistic contract for Holmes.