TheCardFan
Things have changed.
Jury's out on Lawrence.
Remember when Lawrence was a "generational" prospect?
Jury's out on Lawrence.
Yea same TLaw hasnt really took that top 5 leap i thought he would by nowStafford's a good example to counter my thoughts. Jury's out on Lawrence. I expected much more from him and he's been pretty mid so far with decent talent around him the last two years.
I’m not sure he can learn that no matter hire many seasons. I don’t think Kyler wants to learn it at this point. Now, he gets rid of daddy and goes to a QB coach in the off-season maybe he can pick some stuff up and I would change my feelings on if Kyler even want to learn itKyler was brought up in a sandlot offense. He played against inferior talent a could get away with just about anything.
He now plays in a league where the tallest guy in college is now the shortest. The fastest guy in college is now the slowest.
This league is structured and designed. Call a play, read the defense and react accordingly. Play A is covered, go to option B. That’s covered to so go to option C.
It’s 1-2-3 and throw. It’s throw to this open area before your wr is there.
This ain’t Kyler and I’m not sure he can “learn” this in one off season.
People need to quit using the generational rating for prospects. It’s silly. Not saying you use it @TheCardFan just speaking generally.Remember when Lawrence was a "generational" prospect?
Yes, I can. Jackson has one playoff win and no Super Bowl ring. I am referring to a style of QB play, some better than most, but does not seem a consistent style for winning in the NFLMurray shouldn’t be mentioned in the same breath as Jackson.
Yea, the Starling over Clark one is so puzzling to me. The fact that Starling is also a rookie is driving me wild.
Thomas was moved almost immediately into heavy rotation in the defense:if you buy into the conspiracy, they know what they have with Clark (didn't he get ST snaps last week?).
Starling is a mixed bag and I suspect he will get the call to see how he handles the additional snaps and coaching - if they pull he or Hamilton for an even greener DB, that would lend some credibility to the conspiracy
You can but it’s breath wasted.Yes, I can. Jackson has one playoff win and no Super Bowl ring. I am referring to a style of QB play, some better than most, but does not seem a consistent style for winning in the NFL
Clark received no snaps at all last week. Yet he is on some posters list as having been coached up?if you buy into the conspiracy, they know what they have with Clark (didn't he get ST snaps last week?).
Starling is a mixed bag and I suspect he will get the call to see how he handles the additional snaps and coaching - if they pull he or Hamilton for an even greener DB, that would lend some credibility to the conspiracy
And yet KM still isn't even in the conversation with Jackson. That is how bad he has been in the clutch.Yes, I can. Jackson has one playoff win and no Super Bowl ring. I am referring to a style of QB play, some better than most, but does not seem a consistent style for winning in the NFL
Well, there is a comparison, just not a flattering one.You can but it’s breath wasted.
Jackson is on the cusp of taking his team to the playoffs for the 4th time in 6 years, has won an MVP and is in the running to win another.
Kyler has been to the playoffs once in 5 years, been a disaster in the playoffs and mediocre to bad for the last two seasons.
And Kyler doesn’t get near the same mileage out of his legs that Lamar does.
Thus, there’s no comparison.
TBD if that's the only thing that was wrong with Murray. He showed glimpses of his potential and definite improvement in limited action last season, but he has to show he's overcome the flaws in his game to be what we need him to be.Pretty clear what was wrong with Murray was KK
The lack of playing under center (which K1 started to do last year), the lack of change in offense after League defenses figured out KK's offense were the biggest factors IMHO. Kingsbury lacked the ability to adapt, and kept running the same plays over and over. NFL Defensive coordinators, given enough film, will figure out an offense if that offense is stagnantTBD if that's the only thing that was wrong with Murray. He showed glimpses of his potential and definite improvement in limited action last season, but he has to show he's overcome the flaws in his game to be what we need him to be.
Despite the above, I'm actually kind of optimistic heading into the year. The brutal early schedule and our defense will hold us back, but our offense should be solid.
All valid points. He still has to show he can cut out the terrible decision negative plays where he bails on clean pockets. He has to show he can have at least one full, solid season. He has to show leadership to do this. And, importantly, he has to actually win a playoff game. Until and unless he can do those things, he still has plenty to prove. And, for me, this is the season to prove it. Maybe not the playoffs, because the D might cost them a shot, but the rest must be drastically improved from what we're used to, IMO. No more incremental improvements over seasons. He should be fully developed. Now or never for KM.The lack of playing under center (which K1 started to do last year), the lack of change in offense after League defenses figured out KK's offense were the biggest factors IMHO. Kingsbury lacked the ability to adapt, and kept running the same plays over and over. NFL Defensive coordinators, given enough film, will figure out an offense if that offense is stagnant
Fair enoughAll valid points. He still has to show he can cut out the terrible decision negative plays where he bails on clean pockets. He has to show he can have at least one full, solid season. He has to show leadership to do this. And, importantly, he has to actually win a playoff game. Until and unless he can do those things, he still has plenty to prove. And, for me, this is the season to prove it. Maybe not the playoffs, because the D might cost them a shot, but the rest must be drastically improved from what we're used to, IMO. No more incremental improvements over seasons. He should be fully developed. Now or never for KM.
100% Murray as with most players has flaws his height is a thing. But we all know Murray “can” also be the most talented guy on the field at times. He needed to grow up, he needed better leadership, and he needs a balanced rushing attack so the D can’t focus on stopping him. I don’t know how good he can be but the talent is there. I feel this new regime is doing the right things and we will see Murray have every opportunity to be very good. But it is time to take big leaps forward and start doing it. I’m excited.All valid points. He still has to show he can cut out the terrible decision negative plays where he bails on clean pockets. He has to show he can have at least one full, solid season. He has to show leadership to do this. And, importantly, he has to actually win a playoff game. Until and unless he can do those things, he still has plenty to prove. And, for me, this is the season to prove it. Maybe not the playoffs, because the D might cost them a shot, but the rest must be drastically improved from what we're used to, IMO. No more incremental improvements over seasons. He should be fully developed. Now or never for KM.
Lmao, swear this dude just say the same thing verbatim for months now & nothing else.Murray needs to acknowledge the areas in his game that need improvement. Until he does this and makes a commitment to working on those areas, he will always be the could never quite reach the status of a top 10 QB. This is the time of year that everyone is saying positive things and everything is going great and we are improving, however it's still just talk and it needs to move to the field and be shown in the execution and performance of the individual and the team.