We wouldn't have had a shot at more. It would have been the same amount of picks. Who would you gamble on finding two good football players, the team with a #6 and a 4th rounder, or a team with the #17 & #18 picks?And I will continue to say it was a stupid trade because it was...a stupid trade! You're seriously not defending this travesty of a trade, are you? Sure, we would have had one lousy player instead of two, but who knows who we draft in the 4th? Even considering who we would have taken, we'd have had a shot at more.
Bottom line: Stupid, stupid trade. Care to outright disagree?
I'm not defending this trade like it was a great move, I'm just pointing out that it wasn't the horrible, travesty that you always make it out to be...our picks were.
Last edited: