I have to agree here. As much as I say congrats to the Spurs for playing what I felt was a clean series, I have to root against them.
I think Pop is a great coach but I lost a ton of respect for him for using Bush league tactics to help beat the Suns. Phil Jackson who has taken shots all year at Shaq even basically called them bush league moves against the Suns.
I don't think the Spurs needed to resort to those tactics to win the series but they did. I don't know if Pop was so worried about the Suns this year that he felt he had to or not. I just know he did.
I can't route for the Spurs period. I hope the Hornets go all the way. That's who I am going for.
I have read several articles dealing with how the intentional foul itself is detremental to any "true" sport. They say fouls are called for breaking the rules of the game. They go on to state that to intentially break a rule to gain advantage over an opponent is not sporting in itself. The hack a Shaq takes it to a new level.
In basketball , the intentional foul has evolved into a strategy but in its essence is really not sporting. Whatever happened to give me your best shot and ill do the same and whoever is better will prevail?
They rarely call the intentional foul as such in the NBA. You see it a lot more in the college and intermediate level games.
So with that all said, given the state of the game today, the win at all costs attitide that prevails in sports taday, how can you blame Pop for using whatever is given him to his advantage. It certainly doesnt make it sporting and most definetly takes away from the game in general, but it give him the advantage to WIN the title and that is ultimately what gets the recognition. To me personally, it would diminish the value of the win.
Of course, none of this excuses Shaq's failure to make the shots. if he does, nobody would consider breaking the rules.