No. Are there really people who would prefer Dirk over Amare?
Yes. I've said it in the trade forum as well. I think it would revitalize Nash and Dirk simultaneously. It'd give Shaq a little more room to work and spread the floor out to the 3 point line even more and also allow Hill to focus more on his midrange game instead of having to leak out to the 3 point baseline. Works for Barnes, Hill not so much.
Edit: I should say that individually i prefer Amare, but for the team game we're running now I think Dirk fits better and we'd see more production from Nash as well.
Dirk is soft and inferior in the inside IMO. He has a great outside game. Do we really need a perimeter PF? I say no.
Yes. I've said it in the trade forum as well. I think it would revitalize Nash and Dirk simultaneously. It'd give Shaq a little more room to work and spread the floor out to the 3 point line even more and also allow Hill to focus more on his midrange game instead of having to leak out to the 3 point baseline. Works for Barnes, Hill not so much.
as opposed to Amare who's what on the inside? He has no post up game and rebounds at the same rate. Amare's soft as well, but at least Dirk's a better passer and has shown to ability to step up huge in big games. Amare hasn't shown the ability to be any kind of closer since 2004-5.
At least Amare will throw his body and bump guys. He is obviously not a great defender but Dirk on the block is like a revolving door.
Also, Dirk has a post up game?
Since when?
At least Amare will drive around someone and dunk on them.
Dirk would rather stop and pop then use his body against anybody.
As far as closer...you must have forgotten what a great closer Dirk as been in the playoffs lately.
The trouble is the Suns would be living in the past although it would be quite exciting at least for awhile especially since Nash and Dirk play so well together and both are friends.
IMO, the Mavs could have won a Championship if they had just kept Nash and let everything play out. Cuban messed with the Mavs too much because they got jitters and lost in the Finals one season. Ironically if the Mavs had kept Nash in his prime I believe he would have provided them the poise to get past Miami.
they both suck at defense.
he does? I never said he did. Although he can post up people on mismatches which Amare is unable to do.
again, I never said he did so you can answer this question as well as I can.
this rarely happens now.
and he's incredibly effective at it.
I have forgotten anything about Dirk in the last couple years. Thing is I can't remember anything Amare's done at the end of playoff games or big regular season game since 2004-5.
this completely ignores the fact that they would have never gotten to the Finals against Miami because they would have lost to the Spurs, just like every single Steve Nash led team always has.
If you read my post again you will see I was talking about the Mavs missing Nash playing Miami.
i saw that, but they would have never gotten to Miami because they would have never gotten past SA so I think your point is moot. Nash WAS the problem against SA there, just like he is here. He gets killed on D by Parker and is nullified by Bowen on O.
i saw that, but they would have never gotten to Miami because they would have never gotten past SA so I think your point is moot. Nash WAS the problem against SA there, just like he is here. He gets killed on D by Parker and is nullified by Bowen on O.