Would you do the 14th pick and Nash for Torontos first

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,664
Reaction score
28,586
Location
Nowhere
Then you could get Harden. I am sure they would not give it up is it is top 3, but if it is not, I say Kerr needs to call Bryan Colangelo up right away. They are in win now mode. Maybe you even send Amare too and get Calderon back. They are going to be so far under the cap, they can take on the salaries.

Not being a Suns fan, but being a ASU fan, I would love to watch Harden grow in Phoenix since the Bulls have no shot at him.
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Harden at #8? I don't see it and while I like Harden I am not sure he will be a truly special NBA player.

And why give up the #14 pick with Nash?

I am sure New York would trade Curry and #9 for Nash.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
Harden at #8? I don't see it and while I like Harden I am not sure he will be a truly special NBA player.

And why give up the #14 pick with Nash?

I am sure New York would trade Curry and #9 for Nash.

Curry has horrible contract. #9 alone is not enough. Golden State might want to get Nash too.
 
OP
OP
PDXChris

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,664
Reaction score
28,586
Location
Nowhere
Curry has horrible contract. #9 alone is not enough. Golden State might want to get Nash too.

I agree, the NY deal would not work, plus they do not want to win now. GS is also hard because they have so many other needs. Toronto is very close to being good and to bring in a draft pick would not help now. They would also move down to the #6 spot in the draft. You even be able to do Calderon and their number 1 for Nash and Amare and still keep the 14th pick. Then send Shaq to Cleveland for who ever and their number 1 next year and you have your pick back next year. If you can land Harden, then you need to unload J-Rich though. Too bad Kerr is also as dumb as Paxson and would never get creative to make a plan for the future.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
Doable deals might be the following swap:

Nash/JRich/LB for Ellis/Crawford/Azubuike/Fr. C/It. SG

or

JRich to wherever they need a good SG like Minn. or Indiana
 
Last edited:

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
If the CELTICS get de-throned this year i'd look into getting Rondo back and dangling Nash and our 1st. Calderon is nice but Rondo's skills are more of what i have in mind going forward. We might also be able to get BOSTONS late 1st and a younger filler.
The thought of having a backcourt of Rondo/Barbosa at this stage is intriguing and potentially beastly IMO. I don't care that we drafted him, get him back.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
If the CELTICS get de-throned this year i'd look into getting Rondo back and dangling Nash and our 1st. Calderon is nice but Rondo's skills are more of what i have in mind going forward. We might also be able to get BOSTONS late 1st and a younger filler.
The thought of having a backcourt of Rondo/Barbosa at this stage is intriguing and potentially beastly IMO. I don't care that we drafted him, get him back.

How would it work to get Rondo here? Rondo is better, younger and way cheaper than both Calderon and Nash.:mad:
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
I agree, the NY deal would not work, plus they do not want to win now. GS is also hard because they have so many other needs. Toronto is very close to being good and to bring in a draft pick would not help now. They would also move down to the #6 spot in the draft. You even be able to do Calderon and their number 1 for Nash and Amare and still keep the 14th pick. Then send Shaq to Cleveland for who ever and their number 1 next year and you have your pick back next year. If you can land Harden, then you need to unload J-Rich though. Too bad Kerr is also as dumb as Paxson and would never get creative to make a plan for the future.

What? That is ridiculous.. Nash and Amare for the #6 pick? .. just awful.

Plus Curry's contract runs out after next year so it is not horrible.

We could possibly arrange a buyout for him and save 6M$ by trading Nash for him and #9.

Although maybe we could get New York to throw in something additional. Say at least their 2nd rounder we would then have 4 second rounders that maybe we could trade to get a #20 pick for Buddinger.
 
Last edited:

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
How would it work to get Rondo here? Rondo is better, younger and way cheaper than both Calderon and Nash.:mad:
Like i said, d-a-n-g-l-e. ;)
Pipe dream but if any PG can give a veteran team an offensive lift it's Nash..... despite his age IMO. He would simply feed the big three relentlessly and add another scoring dimension that Rondo doesn't have yet. I haven't explored the trade machine on this.
 
OP
OP
PDXChris

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,664
Reaction score
28,586
Location
Nowhere
What? That is ridiculous.. Nash and Amare for the #6 pick? .. just awful.

Plus Curry's contract run out after next year so it is not horrible.

We could possible arrange a buyout for him and save 6M$ by trading Nash for him and #9.

Although maybe we could get New York to throw in something additional. Say at least their 2nd rounder we would then have 4 second rounders that maybe we could trade to get a #20 pick for Buddinger.

It is not just the 6th. It is also Calderon.
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
And what is so good about that?

Calderon has 6 years or so left on his contract , the last years paying him over 10M$. Sorry but I don't want a long term signed, quite expensive, above average, 28 yrs old PG on a rebuilding team.

Nash and Amare for Calderon and #6 is still the joke of the century. Amare alone should get a top3 pick in return.
 

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale
Am i right about this, you're saying the number 14 and Nash for Toronto's first rounder? And Amare for Calderon? Really? So Nash, Amare, and number 14 for Calderon and Toronto's pick? This just does not seem like enough to me.
 

MarkWest

Newbie
Joined
Apr 7, 2009
Posts
32
Reaction score
0
Harden is way overrated. He relies too much on his left hand and is turnover prone. I wouldn't draft him even if he dropped to #14. So we're giving up Nash and Amare, our 2 best players, for Harden, an unproven rookie, and Calderon? Another thing to consider is that if we give up Amare, the only real big guy we got left is Shaq, who is leaving after one year if he even lasts that long. Then we're left with Side Show Rob and Amundson? That would be a bad deal in my opinion.
 
Last edited:

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,798
Reaction score
15,897
Location
Arizona
And what is so good about that?

Calderon has 6 years or so left on his contract , the last years paying him over 10M$. Sorry but I don't want a long term signed, quite expensive, above average, 28 yrs old PG on a rebuilding team.

Nash and Amare for Calderon and #6 is still the joke of the century. Amare alone should get a top3 pick in return.

I agree the trade is a joke. However, Amare for a #1, #2 or #3??? That is just as big a joke. Teams know he doesn't play defense. Teams were also offering garbage at the trade deadline. Usually the first few picks are considered locks. Nobody is going to give you that for Amare. Nobody.

Harden is way overrated. He relies too much on his left hand and is turnover prone. I wouldn't draft him even if he dropped to #14. So we're giving up Nash and Amare, our 2 best players, for Harden, an unproven rookie, and Calderon? Another thing to consider is that if we give up Amare, the only real big guy we got left is Shaq, who is leaving after one year if he even lasts that long. Then we're left with Side Show Rob and Amundson? That would be a bad deal in my opinion.

Agree with Harden being overrated. He is not going to be some superstar IMO. I just don't see it. The guy dissappeared in the biggest stage in baskeball.

In terms of trading Amare, I don't think you can look at it like that. We know how far we can get with a team that doesn't play defense. As long as your best big man is Amare your in trouble anyway. We know Shaq isn't goign to be here. It's time to move Amare, Nash & Shaq. Unfortunately, it appears the Suns want to keep Nash, can't trade Amare (because of the recoving eye injury).
 
Last edited:

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
Would you do the 14th pick....?

If she is the 14th pick then yes.

You must be registered for see images


FWIW I wouldn't do Nash or the Toronto pick though....;)
 

Ronin

In yo city!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
145,939
Reaction score
67,657
Location
Crowley, TX
1) Draft Flynn or Blair

2) trade down and draft Patty Mills
 

Bufalay

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Posts
4,679
Reaction score
786
If the CELTICS get de-throned this year i'd look into getting Rondo back and dangling Nash and our 1st. Calderon is nice but Rondo's skills are more of what i have in mind going forward. We might also be able to get BOSTONS late 1st and a younger filler.
The thought of having a backcourt of Rondo/Barbosa at this stage is intriguing and potentially beastly IMO. I don't care that we drafted him, get him back.

Shaq for Garnett while you're at it.
 
Top