I disagree. Cliche (and also proper) answer is, "I am just focusing on right now, on this season and this team, and I am not even thinking about 2010 yet." Here is a direct quote from Nash:
"It's fun for fans and media," said Nash, who will see his contract expire in 2010. "As players, it's the most idiotic thing in the world to think about two years from now...
Maybe it will be something to talk about in two years, but right now I've got my hands full trying to get us to a higher level."
You are also wrong that nobody cares nor wants to discuss it. Discussion about Amare is very relevant, perhaps the most relevant discussion we can have about the future of this team.
In 2010, the Suns have a decision to make- a big decision that will impact the team for years to come.
If Amare is extended, he will be making Shaq/Tim Duncan/Kobe type of money- way to much for somebody who is not a franchise player.
We all know that Amare is a beast, a freak of nature, an amazingly talended player. Nobody is arguing otherwise. The argument is that he may not have what it takes to be a franchise player, and when a non-franchise player is making $20 mil per year, it is very difficult to win championships. If you have a max player, there is only so much talent you can surround him with. Many of us are worried (as are Kerr and Sarver, I am sure) that Amare is not good enough to lead the team that doesn't have another superstar and a few all-stars on it.
Is Amare in the same league as Duncan, Garnet, young Shaq, Lebron, DWade, etc is a very relevant question. Things like complaining to the press, crying and whining about not being "the man", getting himself ejected from games and thus putting the team in danger of losing ball games, certainly makes for a relevant discussion.