Tannehill kinda sucks. Cousins might do well in this offense, but he’d be a big mistake killer the same as Kyler.
I mean, he’s got a ton of talent in Minnesota and that team consistently finds ways to lose at the end of games that he can’t finish.
I like Tannehill. He's having a rough go of it this year, but the past two seasons he's been sixth and fifth in DVOA. It's funny; right now we're in a weird state of the NFL where we have a bunch of young unknowns but no real equivalent to, like Bengals-era Andy Dalton. Taylor Heinike has a 0.0% DVOA right now, which feels fraudulent.
Wow. Okay. I don’t think so. I think he gets splattered a few times and likely doesn’t finish the season.
I think Kyler--like many mobile QBs--often makes the offensive line look worse than it is. He gets creamed because he's still scampering around even after taking the shotgun snap. More traditional QBs are going to have more secure pockets because their offensive linemen can anticipate where they're going to be at the bottom of their drop.
No way. He’s got just as much talent if not more than Kyler has had all season and that offense will still crater when they really need it more often than not.
hed also crush our cap and keep us from spending wildly on an aging DL who can’t possibly stay healthy.
Maybe Cousins was a bad example because of the psychological baggage and because his teammates seem to hate him. I think if we had Jimmy Garappolo or Matt Ryan or Derek Carr or Teddy Bridgewater we'd be very similar in the standings to where we are now, we'd just have different problems.
But I think the problems would be easier to identify and fix because Kyler introduces so many unique variables into the mix. If we get rid of Kliff (which I don't think we'll do until after next season, TBH), it'll be real interesting to see how a new coach that isn't all-in on him works.