Your Arizona Cardinals now hold the 16th pick in the 2025 NFL Draft

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
65,616
Reaction score
61,379
Location
SoCal
I mean...they kinda are. The 5th year options for S, TE, RB, EDGE, DL, WR, OT, CB and QB aren't detrimental to the extension of those players like it is for ILB and IOL. The goal is to get a long term player with your 1st round pick, and you can use that 5th year to get an extra cost controlled year OR use it as a starting point for the contract extension. For ILB and IOL it does the opposite.
That was an interesting exercise. Thank you. Eye opening
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,600
Reaction score
32,643
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I thought your point was that the 5th year option played a role. But since you don't, we agree.
Don’t you believe that a zero percent success rate on extension and a zero percent pickup rate on fifth year options is compelling evidence that they do in fact play a role in retaining off-ball linebackers past their rookie contract? Do you believe that all 25 selections were just busts?
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
26,476
Reaction score
19,792
Location
The Giant Toaster
The past two seasons Nic Scourton had 15 sacks and 29 TFL. He doesn’t turn 21 until August and sounds like a Gannon guy in interviews. I won’t be surprised if he’s our pick cause he’s a two-way player vs pass and run. He slimmed down after season and seems to be a primary edge going forward.
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,203
Reaction score
3,235
Location
Denmark
Don’t you believe that a zero percent success rate on extension and a zero percent pickup rate on fifth year options is compelling evidence that they do in fact play a role in retaining off-ball linebackers past their rookie contract? Do you believe that all 25 selections were just busts?
Six of them signed bigger contracts when their rookie deals were up. 18 either signed small or average contracts, and most of them are on practice squads with their third, fourth or fifth team, if they are not completely out of the league.

I will stop here. You obviously don’t do any research to know if your guesses are correct, so it doesn’t make sense for me to continue.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,506
Reaction score
12,359
The past two seasons Nic Scourton had 15 sacks and 29 TFL. He doesn’t turn 21 until August and sounds like a Gannon guy in interviews. I won’t be surprised if he’s our pick cause he’s a two-way player vs pass and run. He slimmed down after season and seems to be a primary edge going forward.
Trade to 20/22 and draft Scourton and I'd be okay with that.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,600
Reaction score
32,643
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Six of them signed bigger contracts when their rookie deals were up. 18 either signed small or average contracts, and most of them are on practice squads with their third, fourth or fifth team, if they are not completely out of the league.

I will stop here. You obviously don’t do any research to know if your guesses are correct, so it doesn’t make sense for me to continue.
Hilarious. Zero stayed with the team that drafted them. No lessons learned from 25 instances.

Got it.
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
2,059
Reaction score
295
The past two seasons Nic Scourton had 15 sacks and 29 TFL. He doesn’t turn 21 until August and sounds like a Gannon guy in interviews. I won’t be surprised if he’s our pick cause he’s a two-way player vs pass and run. He slimmed down after season and seems to be a primary edge going forward.
And I would be happy with this…only way I would be upset is if we don’t go trenches…offense or defense?
 

CardNots

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
6,060
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
Hilarious. Zero stayed with the team that drafted them. No lessons learned from 25 instances.

Got it.
Which begs the question, do GMs draft with a priority of a mainstay player or simply a 4-5 year rental?

Which brings me to me as a fan. Do I want a foundational pick or one who plugs a hole/depth on my team.

I’m not really sure. I know I care about my team winning more than who the individual players are.

Maybe I need to change how I view the draft going forward:)
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,918
Reaction score
45,351
Location
Colorado
Six of them signed bigger contracts when their rookie deals were up. 18 either signed small or average contracts, and most of them are on practice squads with their third, fourth or fifth team, if they are not completely out of the league.

I will stop here. You obviously don’t do any research to know if your guesses are correct, so it doesn’t make sense for me to continue.
The point being that none were retained by the team that drafted them. So the team that drafted them saw zero production when it comes to the prime of these players careers 100% of the time. This highlights how the 5th year option is detrimental at ILB for retaining those players, and is also a poor plan for the 1st round when it comes to building through draft.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
26,476
Reaction score
19,792
Location
The Giant Toaster

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
13,079
Reaction score
29,229
Location
Orlando, FL
Much has been written lately about Grant’s ability to penetrate, not just anchor. In fact several have speculated that Grant is a better fit for a 3-4. This is essentially what the Cards run often, but they are very creative in alignments. I’m certainly not confident he’s the Cards’ choice. Nonetheless I’ve studied lots of film and watched numerous games and I’m confident he can blow up a pocket. I’m not sure he’ll stack up tons of sacks, but my feeling is he will really enhance the outside rushers ability to collect sacks. Sweat would definitely benefit from that circumstance as he has a high degree of awareness when he rushes. He always seems to collect those opportunistic sacks. Grant did have 23 QB pressures to go with his 3.5 sacks in 2024. Graham had the same number of sacks and 34 QB pressures. BTW pressures is not an official stat, so you’ll see some variance depending on the standard used.
 

BigDavis75

Making a Comeback
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
4,421
Reaction score
1,580
Location
Amherst, MA
Much has been written lately about Grant’s ability to penetrate, not just anchor. In fact several have speculated that Grant is a better fit for a 3-4. This is essentially what the Cards run often, but they are very creative in alignments. I’m certainly not confident he’s the Cards’ choice. Nonetheless I’ve studied lots of film and watched numerous games and I’m confident he can blow up a pocket. I’m not sure he’ll stack up tons of sacks, but my feeling is he will really enhance the outside rushers ability to collect sacks. Sweat would definitely benefit from that circumstance as he has a high degree of awareness when he rushes. He always seems to collect those opportunistic sacks. Grant did have 23 QB pressures to go with his 3.5 sacks in 2024. Graham had the same number of sacks and 34 QB pressures. BTW pressures is not an official stat, so you’ll see some variance depending on the standard used.

Does he strike you as a guy we could trade down into the twenties and still get?
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,203
Reaction score
3,235
Location
Denmark
The point being that none were retained by the team that drafted them. So the team that drafted them saw zero production when it comes to the prime of these players careers 100% of the time. This highlights how the 5th year option is detrimental at ILB for retaining those players, and is also a poor plan for the 1st round when it comes to building through draft.
No, it doesn't highlight it, but I agree with all the rest. I mentioned in my first post regarding this how teams should not draft off-ball linebackers in the first round because of expected ball production. It should be for other reasons.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
21,234
Reaction score
15,961
Location
Chandler, Az
Maybe Monti will cook again this Draft:

Chargers trade with the Cardinals and select Loveland with the #16 overall pick:
* Arizona trades #16 to the Chargers for their #22, #86 and #125

Cardinals select Tyler Booker G Alabama with the #22 overall pick.

You must be registered for see images attach




Then Monti gets aggressive and moves back into the first round in a trade with the Commanders. Washington currently only has 5 picks in this draft and is looking to restock some picks. So the Cardinals bundle their second rounder and the picks from the previous trade with the Chargers to make the move.
* Arizona trades #47, #86, and #125 to the Commanders for pick #29


Cardinals select Kenneth Grant DT Mich with the #29 overall pick
You must be registered for see images attach


Monti adds two "Big Uglies" in the middle of both Lines!
 

BirdGangThing

Cultist
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
19,653
Reaction score
25,732
Location
Arcadia
Maybe Monti will cook again this Draft:

Chargers trade with the Cardinals and select Loveland with the #16 overall pick:
* Arizona trades #16 to the Chargers for their #22, #86 and #125

Cardinals select Tyler Booker G Alabama with the #22 overall pick.

You must be registered for see images attach




Then Monti gets aggressive and moves back into the first round in a trade with the Commanders. Washington currently only has 5 picks in this draft and is looking to restock some picks. So the Cardinals bundle their second rounder and the picks from the previous trade with the Chargers to make the move.
* Arizona trades #47, #86, and #125 to the Commanders for pick #29


Cardinals select Kenneth Grant DT Mich with the #29 overall pick
You must be registered for see images attach


Monti adds two "Big Uglies" in the middle of both Lines!
i've been on the trade back for booker for a minute now - just seems so monti (and petzing) for that matter

not re-signing hernandez is definitely a part of that logic - but im thinking we go offense in the second round as well
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,568
Reaction score
2,469
Location
ASFN
Maybe Monti will cook again this Draft:

Chargers trade with the Cardinals and select Loveland with the #16 overall pick:
* Arizona trades #16 to the Chargers for their #22, #86 and #125

Cardinals select Tyler Booker G Alabama with the #22 overall pick.

You must be registered for see images attach




Then Monti gets aggressive and moves back into the first round in a trade with the Commanders. Washington currently only has 5 picks in this draft and is looking to restock some picks. So the Cardinals bundle their second rounder and the picks from the previous trade with the Chargers to make the move.
* Arizona trades #47, #86, and #125 to the Commanders for pick #29


Cardinals select Kenneth Grant DT Mich with the #29 overall pick
You must be registered for see images attach


Monti adds two "Big Uglies" in the middle of both Lines!
Yes plz
 

BirdGangThing

Cultist
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
19,653
Reaction score
25,732
Location
Arcadia
took a million years to get to the draft - another 2 million years before training camp - suns went bust and i can't watch baseball 8 days a week - im freakin dyin' over here - binge watching bull ish - plus it's about to be 400° outside - wish i could go to vegas and hang out in the dead parking lot for a couple few months
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
625,091
Posts
5,573,928
Members
6,354
Latest member
MTCardinal
Top