I thought your point was that the 5th year option played a role. But since you don't, we agree.This doesn’t support your point. It supports mine.
I thought your point was that the 5th year option played a role. But since you don't, we agree.This doesn’t support your point. It supports mine.
That was an interesting exercise. Thank you. Eye openingI mean...they kinda are. The 5th year options for S, TE, RB, EDGE, DL, WR, OT, CB and QB aren't detrimental to the extension of those players like it is for ILB and IOL. The goal is to get a long term player with your 1st round pick, and you can use that 5th year to get an extra cost controlled year OR use it as a starting point for the contract extension. For ILB and IOL it does the opposite.
Don’t you believe that a zero percent success rate on extension and a zero percent pickup rate on fifth year options is compelling evidence that they do in fact play a role in retaining off-ball linebackers past their rookie contract? Do you believe that all 25 selections were just busts?I thought your point was that the 5th year option played a role. But since you don't, we agree.
Six of them signed bigger contracts when their rookie deals were up. 18 either signed small or average contracts, and most of them are on practice squads with their third, fourth or fifth team, if they are not completely out of the league.Don’t you believe that a zero percent success rate on extension and a zero percent pickup rate on fifth year options is compelling evidence that they do in fact play a role in retaining off-ball linebackers past their rookie contract? Do you believe that all 25 selections were just busts?
Trade to 20/22 and draft Scourton and I'd be okay with that.The past two seasons Nic Scourton had 15 sacks and 29 TFL. He doesn’t turn 21 until August and sounds like a Gannon guy in interviews. I won’t be surprised if he’s our pick cause he’s a two-way player vs pass and run. He slimmed down after season and seems to be a primary edge going forward.
Hilarious. Zero stayed with the team that drafted them. No lessons learned from 25 instances.Six of them signed bigger contracts when their rookie deals were up. 18 either signed small or average contracts, and most of them are on practice squads with their third, fourth or fifth team, if they are not completely out of the league.
I will stop here. You obviously don’t do any research to know if your guesses are correct, so it doesn’t make sense for me to continue.
And I would be happy with this…only way I would be upset is if we don’t go trenches…offense or defense?The past two seasons Nic Scourton had 15 sacks and 29 TFL. He doesn’t turn 21 until August and sounds like a Gannon guy in interviews. I won’t be surprised if he’s our pick cause he’s a two-way player vs pass and run. He slimmed down after season and seems to be a primary edge going forward.
Ideally yes but I don’t think the opportunity presents itself.Trade to 20/22 and draft Scourton and I'd be okay with that.
Which begs the question, do GMs draft with a priority of a mainstay player or simply a 4-5 year rental?Hilarious. Zero stayed with the team that drafted them. No lessons learned from 25 instances.
Got it.
The point being that none were retained by the team that drafted them. So the team that drafted them saw zero production when it comes to the prime of these players careers 100% of the time. This highlights how the 5th year option is detrimental at ILB for retaining those players, and is also a poor plan for the 1st round when it comes to building through draft.Six of them signed bigger contracts when their rookie deals were up. 18 either signed small or average contracts, and most of them are on practice squads with their third, fourth or fifth team, if they are not completely out of the league.
I will stop here. You obviously don’t do any research to know if your guesses are correct, so it doesn’t make sense for me to continue.
Would love this!!Walter Nolen at #16.
Followed by a trade back into late first for Josh Simmons, who'll redshirt for a year.
Much has been written lately about Grant’s ability to penetrate, not just anchor. In fact several have speculated that Grant is a better fit for a 3-4. This is essentially what the Cards run often, but they are very creative in alignments. I’m certainly not confident he’s the Cards’ choice. Nonetheless I’ve studied lots of film and watched numerous games and I’m confident he can blow up a pocket. I’m not sure he’ll stack up tons of sacks, but my feeling is he will really enhance the outside rushers ability to collect sacks. Sweat would definitely benefit from that circumstance as he has a high degree of awareness when he rushes. He always seems to collect those opportunistic sacks. Grant did have 23 QB pressures to go with his 3.5 sacks in 2024. Graham had the same number of sacks and 34 QB pressures. BTW pressures is not an official stat, so you’ll see some variance depending on the standard used.
No, it doesn't highlight it, but I agree with all the rest. I mentioned in my first post regarding this how teams should not draft off-ball linebackers in the first round because of expected ball production. It should be for other reasons.The point being that none were retained by the team that drafted them. So the team that drafted them saw zero production when it comes to the prime of these players careers 100% of the time. This highlights how the 5th year option is detrimental at ILB for retaining those players, and is also a poor plan for the 1st round when it comes to building through draft.
i've been on the trade back for booker for a minute now - just seems so monti (and petzing) for that matterMaybe Monti will cook again this Draft:
Chargers trade with the Cardinals and select Loveland with the #16 overall pick:
* Arizona trades #16 to the Chargers for their #22, #86 and #125
Cardinals select Tyler Booker G Alabama with the #22 overall pick.
You must be registered for see images attach
Then Monti gets aggressive and moves back into the first round in a trade with the Commanders. Washington currently only has 5 picks in this draft and is looking to restock some picks. So the Cardinals bundle their second rounder and the picks from the previous trade with the Chargers to make the move.
* Arizona trades #47, #86, and #125 to the Commanders for pick #29
Cardinals select Kenneth Grant DT Mich with the #29 overall pick
You must be registered for see images attach
Monti adds two "Big Uglies" in the middle of both Lines!
Who for?but im thinking we go offense in the second round as well
Yes plzMaybe Monti will cook again this Draft:
Chargers trade with the Cardinals and select Loveland with the #16 overall pick:
* Arizona trades #16 to the Chargers for their #22, #86 and #125
Cardinals select Tyler Booker G Alabama with the #22 overall pick.
You must be registered for see images attach
Then Monti gets aggressive and moves back into the first round in a trade with the Commanders. Washington currently only has 5 picks in this draft and is looking to restock some picks. So the Cardinals bundle their second rounder and the picks from the previous trade with the Chargers to make the move.
* Arizona trades #47, #86, and #125 to the Commanders for pick #29
Cardinals select Kenneth Grant DT Mich with the #29 overall pick
You must be registered for see images attach
Monti adds two "Big Uglies" in the middle of both Lines!
55 hours away!
tackle or wrWho for?