Your Arizona Cardinals now hold the 16th pick in the 2025 NFL Draft

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
65,616
Reaction score
61,383
Location
SoCal
I’m not a fan of Simmons at 16 either. I want something to make an impact now, but I do buy the logic. In a draft with limited star power, this could become the best value - just long term instead of immidiately
For a team that punted on year one, made a climb in year two, and is expected to make the playoffs in year three taking that action may just be inopportune timing.

I’ve never loved the idea of knowingly sacrificing a part, or the entirety, of a rookie contract. But when such sacrifice aligns with a season where you’re trying to make a push for the playoffs and relevancy in year three I think it compounds the sacrifice. This is a bit of a change of heart for me. Historically I’ve always been about getting the most value possible. I think in my older, wiser, years I’ve figured out that time is a commodity which too few value appropriately. And that certainly comes into play in a league in which the average tenure of a player is 3.5 years, contracts are typically in the 3-5 year range, and playoff windows (for teams like the Cardinals) are often narrow.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
65,616
Reaction score
61,383
Location
SoCal
I don’t think anyone we take on defense is a game changer in year one. Whereas Jonah is a solid player with one year left on his deal and we’ll have to address that spot eventually. It all sets up for the ability to be patient with Simmons. If we were picking top-10 redshirting a guy would be a hang up but not at #16.
There’s a chasm of impact between game changer and zero production. The latter does nothing to advance the team that considers itself on the cusp of making the playoffs. A good first round selection absolutely helps in that endeavor.
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,203
Reaction score
3,235
Location
Denmark
Mykel Williams has barely been more productive - and he looks slow as hell. The book on him is he has potential, well maybe - but if he has potential than someone with Stewarts athletic ability has even more.
He was injured and often played out of position last season (only 54% of all plays he was outside the tackle). Go back and watch All 22 from last season – especially their bowl game against Florida State. You will see a significantly better version, partly because he was healthy, and partly because he was used the way the Cards would also use him. To me, he would be a highly exciting pick.
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
13,095
Reaction score
5,498
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
The fear on OT Josh Simmons is recovery time from the injury that he had and the history of players having short careers with that injury. On the other handle the Cards could have very good bookend tackles with him & Johnson for many years. I'm sure Monti, JG, OL Coach Frye and the Medical staff all met with him on his visit here with the Cards. Guess we have to have confidence in them. if he is their pick.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
21,236
Reaction score
15,962
Location
Chandler, Az
The fear on OT Josh Simmons is recovery time from the injury that he had and the history of players having short careers with that injury. On the other handle the Cards could have very good bookend tackles with him & Johnson for many years. I'm sure Monti, JG, OL Coach Frye and the Medical staff all met with him on his visit here with the Cards. Guess we have to have confidence in them. if he is their pick.
Simmons is projected to be ready to go when camp opens.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
26,476
Reaction score
19,794
Location
The Giant Toaster
For a team that punted on year one, made a climb in year two, and is expected to make the playoffs in year three taking that action may just be inopportune timing.

I’ve never loved the idea of knowingly sacrificing a part, or the entirety, of a rookie contract. But when such sacrifice aligns with a season where you’re trying to make a push for the playoffs and relevancy in year three I think it compounds the sacrifice. This is a bit of a change of heart for me. Historically I’ve always been about getting the most value possible. I think in my older, wiser, years I’ve figured out that time is a commodity which too few value appropriately. And that certainly comes into play in a league in which the average tenure of a player is 3.5 years, contracts are typically in the 3-5 year range, and playoff windows (for teams like the Cardinals) are often narrow.
.
You have to consider where we’re picking. There’s 2-3 great players in this draft depending on what teams think of Jeanty. The Patriots are picking are picking 12 spots higher and even they’re in a bind to reach for someone.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
13,246
Reaction score
11,267
Just watched a video on McShay's draft - he has 4 of the Gambo 5 going before us, and Stewart, and Pierce.

The only one still on the board is Simmons. If that is the situation we need to try and trade back IMO.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
21,236
Reaction score
15,962
Location
Chandler, Az
Just watched a video on McShay's draft - he has 4 of the Gambo 5 going before us, and Stewart, and Pierce.

The only one still on the board is Simmons. If that is the situation we need to try and trade back IMO.

If 4 of the 5 are gone then you pick your guy that is left.
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
9,099
Reaction score
5,223
Location
Iowa
We havent been a relevant football team in a decade, it feels like we are on the precipice of something, ANYTHING, and you think we have "the luxury" of redshirting a rd. 1 pick for a year? Wild.
Yup. The Monti-JG regime is playing the long game. They'd rather have a very good player in years 2-5 than a good player in years 1-5.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
93,411
Reaction score
73,098
So relevance for you means playoff appearances, ok…

People outside of Arizona rarely talk about the Cardinals and when they do, it’s usually not for the wrong reasons (bad ownership, continual second half of season collapses, one humiliating wild card loss).

What does relevance mean to you if not about winning/being on the national stage?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
625,261
Posts
5,574,233
Members
6,354
Latest member
MTCardinal
Top