Ouchie-Z-Clown
I'm better than Mulli!
For a team that punted on year one, made a climb in year two, and is expected to make the playoffs in year three taking that action may just be inopportune timing.I’m not a fan of Simmons at 16 either. I want something to make an impact now, but I do buy the logic. In a draft with limited star power, this could become the best value - just long term instead of immidiately
I’ve never loved the idea of knowingly sacrificing a part, or the entirety, of a rookie contract. But when such sacrifice aligns with a season where you’re trying to make a push for the playoffs and relevancy in year three I think it compounds the sacrifice. This is a bit of a change of heart for me. Historically I’ve always been about getting the most value possible. I think in my older, wiser, years I’ve figured out that time is a commodity which too few value appropriately. And that certainly comes into play in a league in which the average tenure of a player is 3.5 years, contracts are typically in the 3-5 year range, and playoff windows (for teams like the Cardinals) are often narrow.