Zach Allen Signs with Denver

pemory09

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Posts
2,664
Reaction score
3,323
For all of those saying we "let him walk," it's probably worth considering that maybe he just didn't want to be here for a long rebuild and to learn a new system.

Sure, I suppose we could have franchised him, but otherwise... not our decision to make.
Good point, but…he’s all in on the current mess that is Denver???
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,837
Reaction score
41,741
Location
UK
Oh my. Really? That's where you're hanging your hat?

He went for less than what you're predicting, and suddenly you lowered what you think we should have paid for him. Quelle surprise!

So you're not going to explain the difference then?

Who went for less than I was predicting? Allen? I said he was worth $12-13m but that I could see somebody overpaying $15-16m because I know free agency is nuts.

I don't think Allen is worth $15m+.

I see Allen in the Ogunjobi / Ioainidis range. Statistically he is worse than both at the same stage. This is way above what either of them have ever been paid and into full on Javon Hargrave, Letcher Coz, Grady Jarrett territory and he isn't a fraction of those guys. It's a huge gamble by Denver that he makes a leap.

It's a gamble I could have talked myself into had he stayed, but it's also one I can absolutely understand passing on.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,873
Reaction score
42,064
Location
Colorado
I'd argue it's probably best if you re-sign them before they have the potential to hit the open market, like in their third year. But, you have to be able to actually identify that.

Given that Keim had pretty much drafted nothing but trash in the last decade, was replacing our entire roster every year with "Keim time" deals, overpayment, or traded draft picks, what do you expect? It was literally every year for like the past five that we were in the top five of having to replace rostered players/starters.

Zach Allen is a good, improving player, who got paid like he's gonna be a star. I don't see it.
15mil is being paid like the 25th best defensive/edge lineman. If he produces more, he will be underpaid. Milk doesn't cost a nickel anymore.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,837
Reaction score
41,741
Location
UK
15mil is being paid like the 25th best defensive/edge lineman. If he produces more, he will be underpaid. Milk doesn't cost a nickel anymore.

IF carrying a lot of weight there

The free agency graveyard is littered with the bones of FA signings paid in the hope that they produce more.
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,662
Reaction score
28,586
Location
Nowhere
He missed like 6 games over two years. Kyler missed more and we paid him 45 mil per year.
And 22 over 4 years. I would have liked to have seen him back, but as I said before and you thumbs down, I'm ok not paying him $15 million a year to average 5.5 games missed a year over his career.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,873
Reaction score
42,064
Location
Colorado
And 22 over 4 years. I would have liked to have seen him back, but as I said before and you thumbs down, I'm ok not paying him $15 million a year to average 5.5 games missed a year over his career.
How are you going to judge a player for his production when he wasn't a starter? Allen has been a starter for two season and has put up good numbers over those two seasons. We took a guy in the third round, developed him into one of our four best defensive players, and then let him go at age 26 when he is heading into his prime. His contract is a top 25 defensive front player which is what he is.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,873
Reaction score
42,064
Location
Colorado
As AR would say...."calm down", we're on day 2 of FA.
I find these comments funny because I feel they lack context.

There are 2 interior defensive line players left in free agency who are 27 or under and who played over 50% of defensive snaps last year. Greg Gaines and Taven Bryan. There are two edge players who are available who meet the same criteria, Anthony Nelson and Charles Omenihu.

So, while it may be day 2, our options to add a productive defensive front player who is 27 or younger are Greg Gaines, Taven Bryan, Anthony Nelson and Charles Omenihu.
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,662
Reaction score
28,586
Location
Nowhere
How are you going to judge a player for his production when he wasn't a starter? Allen has been a starter for two season and has put up good numbers over those two seasons. We took a guy in the third round, developed him into one of our four best defensive players, and then let him go at age 26 when he is heading into his prime. His contract is a top 25 defensive front player which is what he is.
Games missed due to injury are Ggames missed whether he was a starter or not. My only concern with him has been durability and he still hasn't shown he can go an entire season without missing games. Again, I would have like to keep him, but I'm ok losing him at $15 million knowing he has durability issues.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,837
Reaction score
41,741
Location
UK
People need to stop uttering Steve Keim as an excuse why Monti can't improve the roster. Yes, the roster has holes heading into this offseason. Monti is the one who is now creating more holes.

Perfectly legitimate and not at all unreasonable to consider a DE in a 3-4 with no more than 5.5 in a season not to be worth $15.25m a year to this roster in the situation it's in.

This was not a must do deal at that price.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,873
Reaction score
42,064
Location
Colorado
For the offensive line, 27 and under playing over 80% of snaps is two players. Orlando Brown and Dennis Daley.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,873
Reaction score
42,064
Location
Colorado
Games missed due to injury are Ggames missed whether he was a starter or not. My only concern with him has been durability and he still hasn't shown he can go an entire season without missing games. Again, I would have like to keep him, but I'm ok losing him at $15 million knowing he has durability issues.
Zach Allen games played at ages 24 and 25. 27.

Myles Garrett games played at ages 24 and 25. 24.

Nick Bosa 33.

Joey Bosa 26.

Chris Jones 23.

Javon Hargrave 26.

Leonard Williams 28.

Maybe it is that playing on the defensive line is really taxing on a young body, and it takes some time to mature and handle that beating.
 
Last edited:

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,837
Reaction score
41,741
Location
UK
I find these comments funny because I feel they lack context.

There are 2 interior defensive line players left in free agency who are 27 or under and who played over 50% of defensive snaps last year. Greg Gaines and Taven Bryan. There are two edge players who are available who meet the same criteria, Anthony Nelson and Charles Omenihu.

So, while it may be day 2, our options to add a productive defensive front player who is 27 or younger are Greg Gaines, Taven Bryan, Anthony Nelson and Charles Omenihu.

What does being 26 have to do with anything?

I don't get this fascination with age. Give me a great 28 year old over an average 26 year old who might be good one day.

Would you rather have Byron Murphy or Jalen Ramsey?

Would you rather have Zaven Collins or Matt Milano?
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,296
Reaction score
35,911
Location
BirdGangThing
People need to stop uttering Steve Keim as an excuse why Monti can't improve the roster. Yes, the roster has holes heading into this offseason. Monti is the one who is now creating more holes.
Keeping Allen isn't improving the roster, it's being ok with status quo.

If Monti is tearing it down, we should be happy, because it means he's fully in control and not 'We're not as bad off as you think' Mike B.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,873
Reaction score
42,064
Location
Colorado
He played in 4 games in 2019, 13 in 2020, 15 in 2021 and 13 in 2022. 45 out of 66 possible games for his career.
So you are taking the argument that it takes years for drafted players to develop and using it against a third round pick? Allen was a mid round draft pick, developed into a quality starter, and now we use that to justify not keeping him?
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,276
Reaction score
5,438
Location
Nashville TN.
What does being 26 have to do with anything?

I don't get this fascination with age. Give me a great 28 year old over an average 26 year old who might be good one day.

Would you rather have Byron Murphy or Jalen Ramsey?

Would you rather have Zaven Collins or Matt Milano?
Ok so we are getting a great 28 year old?The Cardinals failed to sign Allen or Murphy a year ago. Also failed to identify they would get better.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,145
Reaction score
24,638
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Keeping Allen isn't improving the roster, it's being ok with status quo.

If Monti is tearing it down, we should be happy, because it means he's fully in control and not 'We're not as bad off as you think' Mike B.
That is a bold opinion right there, and one I very much disagree with. Well, the wording isn't good. Keeping Allen wouldn't be improving the roster, but insuring it doesn't get a worse. It's laughable labeling it being "ok with status quo" as he was a bright spot on a lousy roster. Good attempt at reframing a roster loss that directly goes against trying to build for the future, though.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,385
Posts
5,435,594
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top