Definitely would helpProbably would help if we had a qb that could read a defense.
Definitely would helpProbably would help if we had a qb that could read a defense.
No, Petzing loves those two and even three TE sets. McBride, Reiman and Higgins were probably on the field more than Jones and Dortch were together. Again,.just my perception but you know it's true.Maybe we don’t run 4 Wr sets because we don’t have 4 good receivers.
Petzing works with what he’s got. If we would have traded for Devonte Adams, Deebo or let’s say Higgins, do you think that might change what heNo, Petzing loves those two and even three TE sets. McBride, Reiman and Higgins were probably on the field more than Jones and Dortch were together. Again,.just my perception but you know it's true.
No. I think they give him the personnel based on his likes.Petzing works with what he’s got. If we would have traded for Devonte Adams, Deebo or let’s say Higgins, do you think that might change what he
“ likes”?
So I guess we can never hope for an upgrade for Wilson or Jones. That’s sad.No. I think they give him the personnel based on his likes.
Because knowing the Cardinals, it probably means they’re now content with their WR room, which still looks pretty weak.Why are people complaining or praising this at all?
He’s a depth roster guy who will have minimal impact at all this year.
Yes . Imagine if MHJ gets hurt.Because knowing the Cardinals, it probably means they’re now content with their WR room, which still looks pretty weak.
No, I don't. It would just bump the other guys down. I don't think he changes his philosophy one but. JMO. Stupid to argue about it because it's impossible to know.Petzing works with what he’s got. If we would have traded for Devonte Adams, Deebo or let’s say Higgins, do you think that might change what he
“ likes”?
Zay's snaps (257) and Dortch (432) = 689No, Petzing loves those two and even three TE sets. McBride, Reiman and Higgins were probably on the field more than Jones and Dortch were together. Again,.just my perception but you know it's true.
I don’t think it’s Petzings philosophy to zero in on one receiver.. I’ve seen many clips of wide open receivers begging for the ball to never even get looked at. Seemed like Wilson was the victim of that a bunch last season.No, I don't. It would just bump the other guys down. I don't think he changes his philosophy one but. JMO. Stupid to argue about it because it's impossible to know.
I don't think it is his philosophy either. I am talking about who he puts on the field.I don’t think it’s Petzings philosophy to zero in on one receiver.. I’ve seen many clips of wide open receivers begging for the ball to never even get looked at. Seemed like Wilson was the victim of that a bunch last season.
Yeah, no reason at all to get better, and it's smart to double the wages of a nobody player, eh? By that rationale, just sign some UDFA for the league minimum rather than Zay Freaking Jones.Well, you have MHJ and Mcbride that K1 is throwing to. It doesn't matter who is #3, 4 or 5. K1 doesn't use his progressions anyway.
Dear lord, if this signing moves the needle for you, I don't know what to say. You are Monti's BFF for sure.I like bringing Jones back. His production would have been significantly better had the NFL not suspended him for something he was exonerated from. Makes no damn sense. Not only did he miss 5 games, he missed 5 weeks of practices & meetings during that suspension. That missed time put him significantly behind when it came to knowing this offense & having any kind of rapport with Murray. MOJG loved that signing last year, so I’ll take their word that they wanted him back.