However, Ishbia's decisions trump Jones'. Ultimately, they go in the direction Ishbia prefers.Arguably, Ishbia could be somewhat excused for being clueless about it. James Jones on the other hand...
However, Ishbia's decisions trump Jones'. Ultimately, they go in the direction Ishbia prefers.Arguably, Ishbia could be somewhat excused for being clueless about it. James Jones on the other hand...
However, Ishbia's decisions trump Jones'. Ultimately, they go in the direction Ishbia prefers.
A 4/5 could work but there are 5's that can't play 4's. I think we have our center. Now we need either a 4 or 4/5.I'm not going to quibble over position label. The Suns needed a 4/5 and didn't address the position at the trade deadline.
The big difference between us on this subject is you apparently believe there was a fix for this mess, I don't.Perhaps I could have said it more clearly, but I disliked the idea of giving up a first round pick to move Nurkic' contract.
Even more so since the Suns didn't address the elephant in the room, the lack of quality rotation depth at the 4/5 position.
This was a salary dump, even though it may pay dividends next season in regard to getting below the 2nd tax apron.
The idea of the Suns standing pat this season with a losing hand doesn't appeal to me.
Either go for it, or rebuild the team. James Jones and Mat Ishbia weren't shy about this when they made the trade for Durant.
Now all of a sudden they realize the CBA is real?
I'm not sure whether I'd agree or challenge what you're saying here. I guess, I would first have to ask what you mean by "succeed?I believe the fix is not in the roster change so much so as change in game philosophy. When we share the ball, our offense flows, when we resort to ISOs, our offense is easily figured out by good def. teams. Bad offense, lots of TOs, leads bad defense due to transitions. We have enough star power, def. more so than many teams now and in history (did Pacers have another star next to Reggie Miller?). If we start empowering players Beal, Allen, Jones more and stay away from ISOs as much as possible, there is a chance to succeed even with this roster.
The big difference between us on this subject is you apparently believe there was a fix for this mess, I don't.
We need to rebuild fairly soon, I really believe that's unavoidable. But I'm not sure of the timing or the pace of that rebuild, the last thing we want to do is look like panicked sellers. I think the important thing for us to do is to make forward looking moves with each trade, draft selection and FA signing. And when the market is there, sell off our veterans.
The worst thing we can do, besides sabotaging our own players, is to give up future assets to add meaningless wins. I'm so thrilled that we didn't do that at this deadline. I was convinced we were going to bring in someone like Jonas at the cost of a pick and Allen. It would have marginally improved us in the short run but would not have been forward looking. That we may have finally showed some restaint gives me hope.
Yes they could have made the product more palatable on the floor this season. I'm so thankful they didn't. When we trade Allen I want future value for him, not an extra couple of wins. When we trade Booker, I don't want a 30 year old star, I want future value. And so on.There is no guaranteed fix for this mess. The Suns have traded many of their most valuable draft assets, so it's choosing the best way forward without them.
The Suns actually did give up a first round pick to trade Nurkic so that is one less future first round pick. IMO, if a team is going to trade a first round pick, trade it for a position of need or not at all.
There were a number of centers the Suns could have added for minimal or no assets except money, but they decided to ignore the problem. At least they could have made the product more palatable on the floor this season. Losing does not breed confidence and is even more likely to make the Suns look like panicked sellers this summer unless they can miraculously right the ship.
At this point, the Suns do not really have much choice but to rebuild part or all of the team, but I do not have a lot of confidence the leadership will make the right decisions.
Well, reaching 2nd round of playoffs?I'm not sure whether I'd agree or challenge what you're saying here. I guess, I would first have to ask what you mean by "succeed?
Yes they could have made the product more palatable on the floor this season. I'm so thankful they didn't. When we trade Allen I want future value for him, not an extra couple of wins. When we trade Booker, I don't want a 30 year old star, I want future value. And so on.
Yeah, I could see that being within reach if we could get Durant to play within a team concept. But for me, I want to see this team building towards a championship and I don't see how that can happen given our questionable depth, our future pick deficit and the second apron restrictions. So to me, anything other than tearing it down and restocking the roster and the pick cabinet, is failure.Well, reaching 2nd round of playoffs?
It's not mutually exclusive. If we perform better with this group then our players could also gain trade value, from Allen, RO to BealYeah, I could see that being within reach if we could get Durant to play within a team concept. But for me, I want to see this team building towards a championship and I don't see how that can happen given our questionable depth, our future pick deficit and the second apron restrictions. So to me, anything other than tearing it down and restocking the roster and the pick cabinet, is failure.
Yeah, I could see that being within reach if we could get Durant to play within a team concept. But for me, I want to see this team building towards a championship and I don't see how that can happen given our questionable depth, our future pick deficit and the second apron restrictions. So to me, anything other than tearing it down and restocking the roster and the pick cabinet, is failure.
True and I want this group to play as well as possible, for trade value but also just for viewing enjoyment. I just wouldn't consider it a "success". And I'd be very disappointed if slightly better play the next few months led to our front office trading away younger players and/or picks to try and build on that improvement.It's not mutually exclusive. If we perform better with this group then our players could also gain trade value, from Allen, RO to Beal
After already trying to trade KD, when we don’t make the playoffs this year, I’m pretty sure they’re going the blow up route. Maybe not with KD and Booker, but KD ain’t gonna want to keep playing on a loser.True and I want this group to play as well as possible, for trade value but also just for viewing enjoyment. I just wouldn't consider it a "success". And I'd be very disappointed if slightly better play the next few months led to our front office trading away younger players and/or picks to try and build on that improvement.
I think so too, at least to the extent they trade KD. Unfortunately, I'm afraid they may still try to rebuild on the fly around Devin though and that solves little.After already trying to trade KD, when we don’t make the playoffs this year, I’m pretty sure they’re going the blow up route. Maybe not with KD and Booker, but KD ain’t gonna want to keep playing on a loser.
After already trying to trade KD, when we don’t make the playoffs this year, I’m pretty sure they’re going the blow up route. Maybe not with KD and Booker, but KD ain’t gonna want to keep playing on a loser.
agreed.I think so too, at least to the extent they trade KD. Unfortunately, I'm afraid they may still try to rebuild on the fly around Devin though and that solves little.
Book tooKD is gone in the offseason for sure. They are going to try and convince Beal as well after a KD trade.
I believe you are partially correct - but what is the reason for all the ISO's? It's KD.I believe the fix is not in the roster change so much so as change in game philosophy. When we share the ball, our offense flows, when we resort to ISOs, our offense is easily figured out by good def. teams. Bad offense, lots of TOs, leads bad defense due to transitions. We have enough star power, def. more so than many teams now and in history (did Pacers have another star next to Reggie Miller?). If we start empowering players Beal, Allen, Jones more and stay away from ISOs as much as possible, there is a chance to succeed even with this roster.
No, I don't think they want him to go. If he doesn't ask out I think he stays.Book too
Yes, the Suns are screwed. Not rebuilding because other teams have more assets to rebuild makes no sense.I'm not disagreeing, but if the Suns rebuild, it's kind of like get a number and stand in line.
So many young, talented teams are ahead of us. And they own their own draft picks, plus many others they have accumulated.
I'm hoping for a good summer where the Suns can improve their team, maybe keep Booker, and add young players and draft picks.
However, I am concerned the Suns have products reaching their expiration date with depreciating value.