15 names I am fine with at 15

GimmedaBall

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 2, 2013
Posts
1,626
Reaction score
1,110
nick foles for 15

That's only half the equation when it comes to Foles.

Eagles might do that if a QB that like is still on the board at 15---they get another young cost controlled QB in the event that Wentzel cant come back from his injury.

Would still need to sign Foles if you want him for more than 1 year. So, how big of contract are you willing to give Foles if the Eagles agree to that trade?
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,197
Reaction score
16,295
Location
Modesto, California
Yep, this says it all from my perspective.

You can't sell me on the idea that it was all Fisher's fault when he had his bad year with the Rams - he also wasn't good with the Eagles the year before he was traded. There's a reason he was traded. There's a reason no one was clamoring for him when he became a free agent from KC. He's almost retired once, so you question where his mindset is going to be, knowing he's already made good money and already has a Super Bowl ring.

Too many reasons not to give up the pick - and the cash - that Foles is going to demand.

yeah... I like Nick ... would give next years second rounder for him in a heartbeat... but nothing more than that
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,281
Reaction score
6,230
Location
Dallas, TX
dramatic Bucky ? fold the franchise because they give a middle 1st round draft pick for the reigning SBMVP QB? When we have no QB's? I can hear Braveheart now - Peace is made in such ways! SLAVES ARE MADE IN SUCH WAYS ---- Bradford was worth a 1st and a 4th to the Vikings- I believe Rams and Browns got 2 first round picks so other teams could draft a chance at a franchise QB - I think many are over valuing pick 15 or under valuing a healthy experienced SBMVP QB. Fact is that's the price and I feel it is a good option to have in any year.
You don’t give up a 1st round pick for a guy who’s play on tape has been solid except for his rookie season & 3 postseason games. But that’s my opinion.

I’d be willing to bet nobody, including the Cardinals give up a #1 for Foles this season
 

Ohcrap75

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Posts
1,270
Reaction score
723
Giving up a first round pick for Foles right now is such a prisoner of the moment point of view. He is Joe Flacco light. Look at what he was able to do in 2012 with superior talent around him. There's a reason Foles just won the SB and given zero consideration to start next season. If they truly believed he could replicate this, why wouldn't they trade Wentz? He would return an incredible amount of picks.
 
Top