Twist18
Registered
I was impressed by all the interviewing info they gave out to the fans. I don't remember them giving the list when DG was hired.
That's what I'm really getting at here, though.
The decision making has somewhat remained the same (although I would argue that Mike and Rod have changed the way the Cardinals do business for the better).
Have the Cardinals record over the last three years been on Rod or the coaching staff? I would say the latter. And that's really what I'm more concerned about.
What's more important --- the label on the bottle or what's in the bottle?
You might be right but I think it may be a big leap. There are coach hiring procedures that must be followed, including minoirty interviews. The poeple taht watch this process are watch dogs and see everything and you will be punished if one does not follow these hiring rules correctly. Detriot found out the hard way.
So, it was Green then? That's what I'm trying to figure out here. I was always under the impression that the decisions were based on input from Green, Graves, Mike B etc and not one person.
From what I heard from Graves he had the final say on personell but took input from all and especially Green.
I don't disagree with this because it is the absolute truth. I just want to point out that the Cardinals have an excellent reputation with the NFL for their minority hiring practices.Remember though the group that watches this stuff are detialed oriented watch dogs with eyes everywhere. Just becuase the Cards have a good reputation doesnt mean they will cut them slack. Those watch dogs are vicious trust me.