- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Posts
- 92,207
- Reaction score
- 70,486
I like his name!
Me thinks the 3 was for height & weight & not speed.Ran a 4.3 40 how does he get a 3 on speed?????
Double B! Double P! Should have kept Double C!
I'd be interested to evaluate the first two picks together: if (for the purposes of this evaluation) the Cardinals were determined to take an ILB and a S in the first two rounds, then how would the combination of Reddick + Baker compare to the combination of Hooker + an ILB they could've taken at 36 (McMillan)? If the depth at ILB is far less than the depth at S, that would give insight to why they took Reddick over Hooker - knowing they could get a good S in round 2.we could have had Hooker already on the roster
+1.I do not know if our comp picks have been figured out, but I do not think it was a lot if they think the guy is special and any comparisons to Honey Badger is not too bad at all. This is what I love... yes we traded, but seeing the Cardinals be aggressive for a guy they believe in is something I seldom saw from this organization, I am digging this draft so far
We could have had a Hooker & a Baker in the Secondary.
Swapping 10 spots and giving 2 4ths and a 6th is a lot for a slightly built 5'9" safety that cant catch
hahahaha but that's just me
Cardinals started the major run on DBs. I love it. Keim has the pulse of this draft.
You must be registered for see images attach
Instant replacement for Tony Jefferson. I like the pick!
Baker is more FS than SS.