SirStefan32
Krycek, Alex Krycek
Wall is an excellent player, but that contract is ugly, considering his injury history. I wouldn't give anything for Rozier save for the Bucks' pick. No way am I giving up Suns' own pick for a pending free agent.
He is a restricted free agent though, is that correct?Wall is an excellent player, but that contract is ugly, considering his injury history. I wouldn't give anything for Rozier save for the Bucks' pick. No way am I giving up Suns' own pick for a pending free agent.
He will be a RFA, correct.He is a restricted free agent though, is that correct?
Geez, I cannot stand Stephen A's broadcasting style. Just watching that clip gave me a headache. "Why are you always yelling??..."xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Whoever trades for Wall at this point does Wash. a gigantic favor. We used to have to give up picks to rid ourselves of those kinds of contracts.I’m on the same page. I’d gamble on wall if it was only a single issue, but the aggregate of:
Relative age
Craptastic knees
Lack of leadership
Fading defense/lack of defensive effort (either way it’s a problem)
And redonkulous contract
Leave me as a solid no thanks.
Quantity (of volume) rather than quality.Geez, I cannot stand Stephen A's broadcasting style. Just watching that clip gave me a headache. "Why are you always yelling??..."
Patience. A PG will be available.
I think this team needs one more lottery trip.
Imagine this:
Tyus Jones
DBook
Bridges
Williamson
Ayton
2 good role players, three stars in the starting lineup. Warren, Jackson, Okobo, and Holmes off the bench. This could be a REALLY good team.
“His expectations, what he expects out of his point guards,” Canaan said. “He gives his point guards a lot of responsibility. We have to understand that. We have to take that and take control of everything that’s going on.”
“He’s on us the most,” Canaan continued. “He’s on us about remembering everything no matter how tough it is. Making sure we know where everybody needs to be at no matter what the situation is. Really, just taking ownership and just being responsible.”
“He really relies on his point guards, but you’ve got to be a player at the end of the day, too,” Melton said. “Sometimes positions don’t matter. You’ve just got to go out there and play. Anyone can bring up the ball. Anybody can take it out. Anybody can shoot the ball. At the end of the day we’re all players.”
Perhaps Igor is asking too much of his current cast of point guards to effectively run his offense.
Certainly it may take more time than anticipated with the present talent.
And the same with Melton.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/spo...t-guards-most-says-starter-canaan/2006217002/
I don't recall anyone saying that, in fact the general notion was that it was motion type offense and that the point guard is typically not too important in such offenses. Phil Jackson's triangle, which is said to be a variety of motion, certainly didn't stress the point. But it sounds like Igor has a different view. When I watched his national team playing he had Dragic playing the point, and who thrived at it, but he's an very experienced PG.Hmmm...
As I recall, someone on this board kept pointing out that point guard was an especially critical position in Igor Kokoskov's system. I wonder who that was...
You don't recall anyone saying that? A few of us were ostracized for saying it and saying it and saying it.I don't recall anyone saying that, in fact the general notion was that it was motion type offense and that the point guard is typically not too important in such offenses. Phil Jackson's triangle, which is said to be a variety of motion, certainly didn't stress the point. But it sounds like Igor has a different view. When I watched his national team playing he had Dragic playing the point, and who thrived at it, but he's an very experienced PG.
Hmmm...
As I recall, someone on this board kept pointing out that point guard was an especially critical position in Igor Kokoskov's system. I wonder who that was...
OK, not that it is critical for Igor's system. Rather the overview that we need an experienced role playing PG to make the rest of the team better.An example of someone, anyone, saying that PG position is of critical importance in Igor's system, please.
An example of someone, anyone, saying that PG position is of critical importance in Igor's system, please.
OK, not that it is critical for Igor's system. Rather the overview that we need an experienced role playing PG to make the rest of the team better.
Igor's system has proven that it is not the answer.
And now we have confirmation from the quotes posted earlier today on this thread that it is in fact critical for Igor and his system as well.
But isn't it the case that if we had an effective Point Guard, he'd be neutralized by Igor's "system"? That everyone and anyone is a facilitator.And now we have confirmation from the quotes posted earlier today on this thread that it is in fact critical for Igor and his system as well.
But isn't it the case that if we had an effective Point Guard, he'd be neutralized by Igor's "system"? That everyone and anyone is a facilitator.
OK, but I would rather see a Point Guard feeding a Shooting Guard and Center whose chances for success are maximized.I think neutralized is probably overstated, perhaps somewhat minimized?