CardNots
ASFN Lifer
“In their first season together in 1997-98, Robinson and Duncan shared the load equally as Robinson averaged 21.6 points, 10.6 rebounds and 2.63 blocks, while Duncan averaged 21.1 points, 11.9 rebounds and 2.51 blocks.”
“In their first season together in 1997-98, Robinson and Duncan shared the load equally as Robinson averaged 21.6 points, 10.6 rebounds and 2.63 blocks, while Duncan averaged 21.1 points, 11.9 rebounds and 2.51 blocks.”
Paul Reed signs an offer sheet with the Jazz that has some kickers.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I was really high on Reed coming out. Haliburton and Reed was my dream scenario for that draft.
Still, is he worth $260 mil? He's good, but THAT good? Of course Ishbia would have signed him for that. I gotta quit thinking cheap. LOL!I didn't follow Reed much, but Haliburton was my guy.
Duncan would’ve been the #1 pick in 96’ but returned to Wake for his Sr season. What’s crazy is the 96’ draft was a top-3 draft all-time anyway and probably goes down as the greatest draft in sports history had Duncan come out that year. Luckily for him the Spurs tanked and won the lottery in 97’. As great as he wasn’t winning 5 titles in Philly with Jerry Stackhouse.Duncan came into the league at 21, David Robinson was 24. Most young players need more developmental time, not only for their games but also as human beings befor the are ready the NBA. And young people are generally more immature for longer now than they were 30 years ago. Sociologists now are saying that adolescence is stretching to near 30 years old for many.
It seems the case with Ayton.
Still, is he worth $260 mil? He's good, but THAT good? Of course Ishbia would have signed him for that. I gotta quit thinking cheap. LOL!
Like I said, I watched a former GM saying after one of the new CBAs came in, and the thought was, how can the players agree to THAT? The former GM said, it's not about the players, it's the owners trying to keep themselves from spending. We look at how restrictive this CBA is supposed to be, but about a week into it and teams are still spending like money is water. If the owners were trying to restrict their spending, this CBA is a failure right out of the gates! LOL! This just changed some rules here and there, but end of the day, talent is getting paid!How much is a star franchise point guard worth and a player that a team builds around?
In today's NBA, if you don't pay it, another team will.
Like I said, I watched a former GM saying after one of the new CBAs came in, and the thought was, how can the players agree to THAT? The former GM said, it's not about the players, it's the owners trying to keep themselves from spending. We look at how restrictive this CBA is supposed to be, but about a week into it and teams are still spending like money is water. If the owners were trying to restrict their spending, this CBA is a failure right out of the gates! LOL! This just changed some rules here and there, but end of the day, talent is getting paid!
I flipped my thinking on this. On the bottom end, now guys who are older, or G League talent, will get those minimum offers to play in the NBA when they probably should be playing elsewhere, because teams will need those guys to fill out roster spots now. Plus the lower teams who have cap space, are paying guys the contracts. So you play in Houston for a bit, get your money, then get traded to a top team, etc. I can see this will still be a have and have not league. It's just offering those lower clubs chances to have stars for a while. Guys will still want to play in LA, etc.However, I see the money drying up. Few teams have cap space anymore.
Good players are being traded for second round picks. That's how tight money is.
I bet the new CBA goes back to the bargaining table before it expires in 7 years.
I flipped my thinking on this. On the bottom end, now guys who are older, or G League talent, will get those minimum offers to play in the NBA when they probably should be playing elsewhere, because teams will need those guys to fill out roster spots now. Plus the lower teams who have cap space, are paying guys the contracts. So you play in Houston for a bit, get your money, then get traded to a top team, etc. I can see this will still be a have and have not league. It's just offering those lower clubs chances to have stars for a while. Guys will still want to play in LA, etc.
I think of it this way. New CBA came out. It's like a new board game. Ishbia seems to be that friend you have that reads all the rules of the game, and pulls off stuff while you are playing and points out, "it's in the rules!" It seems we were the only team that initially reacted to the Aprons, etc, and decided to go over them on purpose. It took other teams a few days to catch up to us. It seems very purposeful we chose that strategy you outlined: "I mostly see the money being reshuffled, but now here is a limit.
However, there are probably more NBA caliber players than ever before, so they will provide a ready supply of vet minimum, two-way contract and G-League players.
In other words, I think the CBA has created a tier of lower paid quality NBA talent. Maybe the Suns philosophy of spend the bank and fill in with lower paid players works in this new environment.
Maybe the Suns philosophy of spend the bank and fill in with lower paid players works in this new environment."
However, I see the money drying up. Few teams have cap space anymore.
Good players are being traded for second round picks. That's how tight money is.
I bet the new CBA goes back to the bargaining table before it expires in 7 years.
Just saying, Duncan was a generational talent. Don’t sell him short. He kicked out ass enough times for sure …
That’s good for the game overall I think.Young talent will have to play in the G league or stay in College. Benches will be filled with vet mim players.
You missed the point entirely so we’re done. I violated my rule, don’t argue a point more than once it’s useless.Just saying, Duncan was a generational talent. Don’t sell him short. He kicked out ass enough times for sure …