2023-24 Around the NBA Thread

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,364
Reaction score
12,537
Location
Tempe, AZ
Still doesn't answer my question. If you are out of the ranges mentioned and are trading into that range, it currently doesn't look like you can get the medical info. Thus: "What if a team is trading up on draft night? You could be out of the draft range, but be moving up to get a guy. I think the whole league needs access, but it should be VERY strict. Maybe read only documents that can't be copied?"

If a player fails a physical then trades can be voided so I'd imagine that could come into play.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,959
Reaction score
58,201
Klutch is losing their leverage slowly but surely. As LeBron ages and becomes less of a factor, they haven't had the sway they used to. Once LeBron is gone, I wouldn't be surprised if Klutch leaves the NBA shortly after.

That is part of the plan going forward. Although it will be only be available to teams in range to select the player. Like the Suns wouldn't have been able to get Wemby's medical info because there was no way they could have selected him.

Details here....


These are welcome changes, as the draft should not be controlled by players and agents.

Too bad the Suns the don't have another season under the old system.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,364
Reaction score
12,537
Location
Tempe, AZ
These are welcome changes, as the draft should not be controlled by players and agents.

Too bad the Suns the don't have another season under the old system.

And the Suns don't have a pick during this CBA cycle.
;)



Yes, I know we have one every other year. It's called a joke.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,959
Reaction score
58,201
And the Suns don't have a pick during this CBA cycle.
;)



Yes, I know we have one every other year. It's called a joke.

Although, the Suns will have some team's first round pick in the 2024 draft and every other draft unless they trade the rights to the player away.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
22,682
Reaction score
12,432
Location
Laveen, AZ
So far as I've seen, we still have 2024 first round and second round picks. One each.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
22,682
Reaction score
12,432
Location
Laveen, AZ
Again, back to the medical, Haliburton dropped out of the top ten. So Sacramento would not have had a chance to look at his medical records. Just interesting.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,364
Reaction score
12,537
Location
Tempe, AZ
Again, back to the medical, Haliburton dropped out of the top ten. So Sacramento would not have had a chance to look at his medical records. Just interesting.

Yes they would. Did you read the article?

There will be limits on sharing medical information among teams based on the projected draft range of top players. For example, the projected No. 1 pick will have his medical information shared only with teams picking in the top 10. Players ranked 2-6 will be shared with teams in the top 15, and players 7-10 with teams in the top 25, with the exception of potentially life-threatening injury or medical conditions that render a player unfit to perform his duties as a professional basketball player, in accordance with the Fitness-to-Play Panel process.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,959
Reaction score
58,201
Before the new rule change, I believe agents were withholding medical information from certain teams. The Kings might have still had access to Haliburton's medical information.

With the new rule change, this is how the article reads in regard to medical information being shared. See below:

The Kings drafted #12 so as I understand it, they would have been able to get Haliburton's medical information under the new rules. He was slotted to go later than #1.


By Jonathan Givony, ESPN Apr 18, 2023, 11:05 AM ET:

There will be limits on sharing medical information among teams based on the projected draft range of top players. For example, the projected No. 1 pick will have his medical information shared only with teams picking in the top 10. Players ranked 2-6 will be shared with teams in the top 15, and players 7-10 with teams in the top 25, with the exception of potentially life-threatening injury or medical conditions that render a player unfit to perform his duties as a professional basketball player, in accordance with the Fitness-to-Play Panel process.


 

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,866
Reaction score
1,674
Before the new rule change, I believe agents were withholding medical information from certain teams. The Kings might have still had access to Haliburton's medical information.

With the new rule change, this is how the article reads in regard to medical information being shared. See below:

The Kings drafted #12 so as I understand it, they would have been able to get Haliburton's medical information under the new rules. He was slotted to go later than #1.


By Jonathan Givony, ESPN Apr 18, 2023, 11:05 AM ET:

There will be limits on sharing medical information among teams based on the projected draft range of top players. For example, the projected No. 1 pick will have his medical information shared only with teams picking in the top 10. Players ranked 2-6 will be shared with teams in the top 15, and players 7-10 with teams in the top 25, with the exception of potentially life-threatening injury or medical conditions that render a player unfit to perform his duties as a professional basketball player, in accordance with the Fitness-to-Play Panel process.


Seems odd considering anyone could theoretically make a trade, or if a player drops outside that range the other orgs wouldn't know if it was medically related.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,959
Reaction score
58,201
Seems odd considering anyone could theoretically make a trade, or if a player drops outside that range the other orgs wouldn't know if it was medically related.

I suspect teams and agents share medical information in these situations. Sometimes when a player drops in the draft, it's because of medical issues.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,364
Reaction score
12,537
Location
Tempe, AZ
Seems odd considering anyone could theoretically make a trade, or if a player drops outside that range the other orgs wouldn't know if it was medically related.

Then the team trading out of that pick would need to give up the medical report, similar to now when they trade one of their players.

I don't see the issue and am genuinely surprised others are finding issues. This is also a breakdown of a 91 page document sent to teams. I'm sure that info is covered but doesn't need to be included in the article because most fans aren't looking to poke holes in the new process.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,364
Reaction score
12,537
Location
Tempe, AZ
Forgive me if I am wrong, but I thought Halliburton was projected in the top ten?

EDIT: I misread the ranges. Sorry!

He was, see Mainstreet's post above. Players projected 2-6 are shared with the top 15 picks, players 7-10 are shared with teams with a top 25 pick.


Edit - All good. Just trying to help, not trying to be a jerk.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,959
Reaction score
58,201
I'm glad the Bradley Beal trade went more smoothly.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,439
Reaction score
18,325
Location
The Giant Toaster
I'm glad the Bradley Beal trade went more smoothly.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Beal had an official no trade clause while Lillard, Durant, AD and Harden had unofficial no trade clauses. Superstars determine where they go regardless of clauses these days.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,143
Reaction score
6,582
Beal had an official no trade clause while Lillard, Durant, AD and Harden had unofficial no trade clauses. Superstars determine where they go regardless of clauses these days.
Yet the deal would be far more likely to be happening immediately if Lillard had an actual no trade clause.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,959
Reaction score
58,201
Beal had an official no trade clause while Lillard, Durant, AD and Harden had unofficial no trade clauses. Superstars determine where they go regardless of clauses these days.

I know but the Wizards didn't have to cooperate.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,582
Posts
5,408,533
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top