2023-24 Free Agency

Raindog

I didn't come here to be liked!
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Posts
5,391
Reaction score
6,814
Some of these contracts are just wild. All of a sudden Beal and Ayton's contracts don't look so bad.
Indeed. All of the talk about the Suns being stuck with a bunch of overpriced, bad contracts and skirting the salary cap apron(s)... not so much anymore.

Several of these other teams are now also right up against (or over) one or the other aprons, and are going to be stuck with bad contracts on less worthy guys than the Suns are paying... which is also going to make them tougher to dump in another season or two should they falter or have injury issues. Suns not looking so crazy/dumb after all.
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,425
Reaction score
16,298
Stupid money

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,425
Reaction score
16,298
Mikal basically across the street.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,425
Reaction score
16,298
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,425
Reaction score
16,298
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
22,697
Reaction score
12,446
Location
Laveen, AZ
The chips are coming off the board. TC and Eric Gordon still out there!
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,290
Reaction score
58,623
Indeed. All of the talk about the Suns being stuck with a bunch of overpriced, bad contracts and skirting the salary cap apron(s)... not so much anymore.

Several of these other teams are now also right up against (or over) one or the other aprons, and are going to be stuck with bad contracts on less worthy guys than the Suns are paying... which is also going to make them tougher to dump in another season or two should they falter or have injury issues. Suns not looking so crazy/dumb after all.

The problem, as I understand it, the Suns can't bundle any players in an outgoing trade because they are over the 2nd tax apron.
All their contracts are large, except for Payne and the vet minimum players. It's hard to do a trade like that.

Also, the only players the Suns can sign are vet minimum players except for perhaps Craig, early bird rights.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
22,697
Reaction score
12,446
Location
Laveen, AZ
The problem, as I understand it, the Suns can't bundle any players in an outgoing trade because they are over the 2nd tax apron.
All their contracts are large, except for Payne and the vet minimum players. It's hard to do a trade like that.

Also, the only players the Suns can sign are vet minimum players except for perhaps Craig, early bird rights.
True, but I liked yesterday. I think we got a lot of value. Being over the second apron by being so top heavy got guys taking less to come here. Interesting strategy.
 

Raindog

I didn't come here to be liked!
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Posts
5,391
Reaction score
6,814
The problem, as I understand it, the Suns can't bundle any players in an outgoing trade because they are over the 2nd tax apron.
All their contracts are large, except for Payne and the vet minimum players. It's hard to do a trade like that.

Also, the only players the Suns can sign are vet minimum players except for perhaps Craig, early bird rights.
But the point is the Suns are paying for a roster that can actually win it all. The vast majority of these other teams are at (or in some cases, over) the same threshold, and in many cases, with guys on worse contracts... but aren't going to come close to winning anything for it.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,290
Reaction score
58,623
True, but I liked yesterday. I think we got a lot of value. Being over the second apron by being so top heavy got guys taking less to come here. Interesting strategy.

True, but I don't know if this strategy can work year in and year out, filling out a roster with minimum players.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,290
Reaction score
58,623
But the point is the Suns are paying for a roster that can actually win it all. The vast majority of these other teams are at (or in some cases, over) the same threshold, and in many cases, with guys on worse contracts... but aren't going to come close to winning anything for it.

A lot of people think the Nuggets, Lakers, and Bucks can win it along with the Suns.

The concern on NBA TV is the Suns are top-heavy.

However, I think the Suns are better balanced than last season and have added another star. They talk about what if one of the Suns stars gets injured, but this applies to every contender.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,318
Reaction score
11,397
Mikal basically across the street.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

For some reason I had it in my head that Hart was older than that crowd.

He’s an entertaining character.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,381
Reaction score
12,562
Location
Tempe, AZ
The problem, as I understand it, the Suns can't bundle any players in an outgoing trade because they are over the 2nd tax apron.
All their contracts are large, except for Payne and the vet minimum players. It's hard to do a trade like that.

Also, the only players the Suns can sign are vet minimum players except for perhaps Craig, early bird rights.

They can combine salaries of players who make less than the league average. So say we resign Craig at $8m per, we can combine him with a minimum deal for a $10m player. We could not combine him with Payne though for 1 player making more than the league average, which is roughly the MLE. They'd combine for $14m and that's too much. We could bring back 2 or 3 players making that much total but no one player making at or more than the average.

There's some info in #86.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,318
Reaction score
11,397
I was very curious how this new CBA would effect spending, it is clear that the intent was to try to get teams to only offer these long, massive deals to actual superstars and create more balanced spending.

That clearly didn't happen. These teams can't help themselves. Some really mediocre guys got max deals, some flat out trash players got 15-20 million a year.

Insanity.

This honestly might have been the stupidest couple days of NBA spending since the big CBA jump and goof balls like Mozgov got 70 million.

Beals' deal will be hard to move, but unless Ayton goes full Ben Simmons on us, that contract will likely have positive value in a year.
 
Top