- Joined
- May 13, 2002
- Posts
- 38,462
- Reaction score
- 25,362
Because he is a QB.Yeah, why again is he being touted as a 1st rounder?
Because he is a QB.Yeah, why again is he being touted as a 1st rounder?
I saw the Notre Dame game and if that is the one game you watched of MHJ and made your opinion based on that, you would also think he wasn't worthy of the top pick. Even the greats have a bad game now and then.I didn’t watch those games, so I didn’t comment on them. That’s how firsthand observation works.
Oh I know there are starters to be had at #21 and #35...but if we are looking for a starting #1 WR...Im not sure there are any of those guys around in that range. Its possible because there are so many tier 2 and tier 3 guys that teams wait and it pushes all the WR's down...but my point was that if we see Nabers or Oduze or even Coleman as "the guy", we have the ammo to go and get them and not sit around waiting to see if they fall, or settling for a guy with more question marks.Verse is just a name...could be any DL guy there...same as Mims.. or Rice... but there are players at those spots who will start from day 1 for this team.
But you should keep your eyes on Brenden Rice... traits, attitude, system...all more important than catches and yards in regards to how a guy relates to the nfl...Rice took the portal to SC, played with Caleb....Williams isnt the best QB for a guy whose strength is running routes...he likely doubles his numbers had he gone to a school with a traditional drop back passer. Rice is considered a round 3 pick now...but he wont be come april
we have lots of ammo for sure... but what hurts us a lot is that huge gap after 35, lol...we trade that pick away we are waiting a loooong time before we pick again....if anything I might expect Monti to trade back at 35...to around 45..and maybe pick up another third.Oh I know there are starters to be had at #21 and #35...but if we are looking for a starting #1 WR...Im not sure there are any of those guys around in that range. Its possible because there are so many tier 2 and tier 3 guys that teams wait and it pushes all the WR's down...but my point was that if we see Nabers or Oduze or even Coleman as "the guy", we have the ammo to go and get them and not sit around waiting to see if they fall, or settling for a guy with more question marks.
The same could be said for any position. Shoot, if we take MHJ at #4 and Fashanu falls to that #10 range, I would trade up for him!
You think both OTs AND MHJ will be gone in the first 3 picks? That would mean 0 QBs taken.
I totally agree. Right now we have 7 picks in the top 100...including 3 3rds.we have lots of ammo for sure... but what hurts us a lot is that huge gap after 35, lol...we trade that pick away we are waiting a loooong time before we pick again....if anything I might expect Monti to trade back at 35...to around 45..and maybe pick up another third.
I dunno...my personal philosophy is to get as many picks as you can in the top 50...most drafts the talent starts dropping around there.
while I dont see anybody worthy of using premium picks as trade bait...I can respect the concept of going and getting the guys you really want.
You mean like with Bryant Johnson and Calvin Pace instead of SuggsDefinitely a risk - which is why its best to have 2 targets for that type of move.
But you could miss on both as well!
You mean like with Bryant Johnson and Calvin Pace instead of Suggs
That makes a lot more sense...That post was before we lost - thinking we could be top 7 at worst.
According to this chart its worth #9! More than enough to put us in a spot to get Nabers or Odunze...I dont see three Wr's going top 10..but you never know.
But this wasn’t the only game I watched of odunze.I saw the Notre Dame game and if that is the one game you watched of MHJ and made your opinion based on that, you would also think he wasn't worthy of the top pick. Even the greats have a bad game now and then.
I would be thrilled but the thing is we have so many needs on d. I see 21 as the corner value with the 2 Alabama guys quinyon and Wiggins. How about harrisson kool aid and Barton at 35? I would love newton or verse at 21 but I just don’t see them being on the boardOh I know there are starters to be had at #21 and #35...but if we are looking for a starting #1 WR...Im not sure there are any of those guys around in that range. Its possible because there are so many tier 2 and tier 3 guys that teams wait and it pushes all the WR's down...but my point was that if we see Nabers or Oduze or even Coleman as "the guy", we have the ammo to go and get them and not sit around waiting to see if they fall, or settling for a guy with more question marks.
The same could be said for any position. Shoot, if we take MHJ at #4 and Fashanu falls to that #10 range, I would trade up for him!
remains to be seen of course but I dont think this staff is going to value corners... Gannons D in philly made their living getting pressure with 4 and dropping 7...dont need premiere corners in a system like that.I would be thrilled but the thing is we have so many needs on d. I see 21 as the corner value with the 2 Alabama guys quinyon and Wiggins. How about harrisson kool aid and Barton at 35? I would love newton or verse at 21 but I just don’t see them being on the board
Somewhere you're forgetting OL. That needs to be an early priority in the draft.We better start getting our minds right and make plans for MHJ being gone.
I can see us trading down and going defense like Verse and then coming back up and getting the best Wr whether it’s Odunze, Nabers, or Coleman. We then turn back to defense.
Not forgetting the o-line. I think if our plan is to move PJJ to the left side I think we will sign a f/a RT.Somewhere you're forgetting OL. That needs to be an early priority in the draft.
Maybe Pass rush with 1st pick, like you say after a trade back....then OL with 2nd pick. Then WR early round 2?
back of the first or early second there are several guys who can step in at RT day oneNot forgetting the o-line. I think if our plan is to move PJJ to the left side I think we will sign a f/a RT.
I say that because more often than not an o-lineman drafted in the 3rd or 4th round are looked at as a development kind of player and not a player we’d be depending on as we head into 2024.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media.
Hard pass on this plan.Somewhere you're forgetting OL. That needs to be an early priority in the draft.
Maybe Pass rush with 1st pick, like you say after a trade back....then OL with 2nd pick. Then WR early round 2?