2024 Draft Countdown/NFL Prospects thread

Douxie

Newbie
Joined
Jan 8, 2024
Posts
7
Reaction score
16
Location
Scottsdale
Is anyone considering Brock Bowers? We have a legitimate top end TE in McBride, maybe double down and make it an absolute strength position that could be a huge mismatch for most teams to try and cover. This would give Murray an extra security blanket to throw to and Bowers is a wrecking ball, the guy doesn’t go down first hit. We would instantly have a top tier TE duo in the league which to me would be worthy of having for the #4 pick.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,094
Reaction score
16,126
Location
Modesto, California
Is anyone considering Brock Bowers? We have a legitimate top end TE in McBride, maybe double down and make it an absolute strength position that could be a huge mismatch for most teams to try and cover. This would give Murray an extra security blanket to throw to and Bowers is a wrecking ball, the guy doesn’t go down first hit. We would instantly have a top tier TE duo in the league which to me would be worthy of having for the #4 pick.
we also have Higgy Bear...dude is developing nicely. Certainly not considering a first round pick on an H Back
 

Douxie

Newbie
Joined
Jan 8, 2024
Posts
7
Reaction score
16
Location
Scottsdale
we also have Higgy Bear...dude is developing nicely. Certainly not considering a first round pick on an H Back
I like Higgens, definitely a solid receiver, pretty good route runner. To me, Bowers is a difference maker. 4.5 speed and an absolute matchup nightmare for linebackers. The amount of strategizing defensive coordinators would have to go through trying to stop him, McBride and Connors would be fun to watch.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,411
Reaction score
18,303
Location
The Giant Toaster
Is anyone considering Brock Bowers? We have a legitimate top end TE in McBride, maybe double down and make it an absolute strength position that could be a huge mismatch for most teams to try and cover. This would give Murray an extra security blanket to throw to and Bowers is a wrecking ball, the guy doesn’t go down first hit. We would instantly have a top tier TE duo in the league which to me would be worthy of having for the #4 pick.

I love Brock but he’s not going top-10 and he’ll be gone by Houston’s pick. He doesn’t impact us.
 

Douxie

Newbie
Joined
Jan 8, 2024
Posts
7
Reaction score
16
Location
Scottsdale
I love Brock but he’s not going top-10 and he’ll be gone by Houston’s pick. He doesn’t impact us.
If he slides past 10 I’d be surprised. Tight ends tend to drop so it’s definitely possible as long as the Chargers pass on him at 5. If MHJ is gone and we can somehow trade the pick and grab him at the 8 spot I’d be thrilled. I really think this kid is generational.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,411
Reaction score
18,303
Location
The Giant Toaster
If he slides past 10 I’d be surprised. Tight ends tend to drop so it’s definitely possible as long as the Chargers pass on him at 5. If MHJ is gone and we can somehow trade the pick and grab him at the 8 spot I’d be thrilled. I really think this kid is generational.

This is silly I’m as big a Brock honk there is. Monty isn’t trading up that high for anyone.
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,264
Reaction score
15,326
Location
Charlotte
Quinyon Mitchell seem like perfect Gannon/Rallis pick. Like how Garrett was.

That could be our 2nd round pick….

Serious question. What makes Quinyon a better fit in their scheme?

What do you think about Terrion Arnold?
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,792
Reaction score
25,735
Location
Orlando, FL
Is anyone considering Brock Bowers? We have a legitimate top end TE in McBride, maybe double down and make it an absolute strength position that could be a huge mismatch for most teams to try and cover. This would give Murray an extra security blanket to throw to and Bowers is a wrecking ball, the guy doesn’t go down first hit. We would instantly have a top tier TE duo in the league which to me would be worthy of having for the #4 pick.
I don’t think the offense is designed for 2 receiving TEs. Higgins has the potential to be adequate as a secondary target.
 

HairZach

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
1,447
Reaction score
3,007
Location
VA
I don’t think the offense is designed for 2 receiving TEs. Higgins has the potential to be adequate as a secondary target.
I would be curious to see what our offense could do with 13 personnel as our base.
 

Douxie

Newbie
Joined
Jan 8, 2024
Posts
7
Reaction score
16
Location
Scottsdale
I would be curious to see what our offense could do with 13 personnel as our base.
I agree, lots of heavy packages we could run with athletic blocking tight ends who can also catch and Connor at back. Would give us a whole different look on offense at times. Would be very difficult for defenses to prepare for. Bowers is my pick if MHJ is gone.
 

Rohinaz

All Star
Joined
Oct 14, 2018
Posts
553
Reaction score
622
Location
Scottsdale
I agree, lots of heavy packages we could run with athletic blocking tight ends who can also catch and Connor at back. Would give us a whole different look on offense at times. Would be very difficult for defenses to prepare for. Bowers is my pick if MHJ is gone.
Id take Nabers in a heartbeat
 

CardNots

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
4,904
Reaction score
5,336
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
I agree, lots of heavy packages we could run with athletic blocking tight ends who can also catch and Connor at back. Would give us a whole different look on offense at times. Would be very difficult for defenses to prepare for. Bowers is my pick if MHJ is gone.
Does Bowers block well?
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,583
Reaction score
15,843
Location
Plainfield, Il.
I agree, lots of heavy packages we could run with athletic blocking tight ends who can also catch and Connor at back. Would give us a whole different look on offense at times. Would be very difficult for defenses to prepare for. Bowers is my pick if MHJ is gone.
That’s cool but we need the threat of a big play, strike fast element to compliment that.
 

Fitz4Ever

Veteran
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Posts
475
Reaction score
911
Location
Idaho
Im not taking Bowers anywhere in the top 10. McBride is too good already to spend a top 10 pick IMO...but if we make a big trade back or he somehow lasts to the Texans pick...I think the talent becomes hard to pass up. There is absolutely a place for a 2 TE offense with a power running game. Teams would have to change their gameplan, and would HAVE to stack the box.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,851
Is anyone considering Brock Bowers? We have a legitimate top end TE in McBride, maybe double down and make it an absolute strength position that could be a huge mismatch for most teams to try and cover. This would give Murray an extra security blanket to throw to and Bowers is a wrecking ball, the guy doesn’t go down first hit. We would instantly have a top tier TE duo in the league which to me would be worthy of having for the #4 pick.
Definitely not at 4, but I would consider him in a trade down. I'm in the minority though.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,267
Reaction score
40,261
Location
Colorado
Yeah. I totally disagree with this. I think that paying two top-five contracts on the same offensive line or any position unit is an inefficient use of resources.

The reality is that you get three max contracts on offense and defense, maybe seven max contracts total (for a little while). Concentrating those resources at QB and both OT positions really stresses the ability of a front office to keep drafting strong role players across the rest of the offense.

I always think about how the Colts built their roster around Peyton Manning's max contract -- Marvin Harrison and then Reggie Wayne plus Tarik Glenn and then Jeff Saturday. Then they had to really save money on off-ball linebacker and cornerback (usually solving with scheme).
When the Cardinals are this talent deficient...I think it matters less. Just looking at the contracts they have, there is a lot of flexibility moving forward. I agree there can be scenarios where positional allotments matter in terms of balancing the roster but I feel we aren't at that point.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,365
Reaction score
29,729
Location
Gilbert, AZ
When the Cardinals are this talent deficient...I think it matters less. Just looking at the contracts they have, there is a lot of flexibility moving forward. I agree there can be scenarios where positional allotments matter in terms of balancing the roster but I feel we aren't at that point.
I dunno. I think when you're drafting very high you have to plan around that player signing a max contract in 3-5 years. It's different when you're outside the lottery and there's a less than 60% chance of your guy signing a second contract.

I don't see a successful team having two max contract tackles as their cornerstones, a QB making max money but playing like Joe Flacco, and then making it work everywhere else. It's just a tightrope that I don't think many front offices can manage. Ozzie Newsome did something like that for a while with the Ravens.
 
Top