Stout
Hold onto the ball, Murray!
To a team that could compete with Levi frickin' Brown on the OL and a monstrous carousel of QBs.Transformed them to what, exactly?
To a team that could compete with Levi frickin' Brown on the OL and a monstrous carousel of QBs.Transformed them to what, exactly?
Wait—when did they compete without Carson Palmer and Kurt Warner at QB?To a team that could compete with Levi frickin' Brown on the OL and a monstrous carousel of QBs.
right? The only thing Larry gave us was someone to root for and flashes of greatness amongst years of meh...Wait—when did they compete without Carson Palmer and Kurt Warner at QB?
Transformed them to what, exactly?
Joe Thomas was a higher-level player at a more valuable position.right? The only thing Larry gave us was someone to root for and flashes of greatness amongst years of meh...
and the knowledge of exactly where the ball was gonna go on third and nine.
because he cant even elevate a poor QB if that QB does not have time to make the pass. though we did see lots of chuck it up to Larry and pray as our QB went down, lolJoe Thomas was a higher-level player at a more valuable position.
I appreciate Larry’s time here and he’s the main Cardinal most people will remember, but if anything he highlights that a great WR chosen with a high pick is still a dependent position if the franchise is going to go anywhere.
Yes and no. It seems like an offensive line can only get you so far. I get an argument that starts with, upgrading Humphries with Fashanu is not as impactful as upgrading Brown with MHJ. And we all pretty much agree that it isn't cost effective to use a 1st round pick on an interior OL player.Joe Thomas was a higher-level player at a more valuable position.
I appreciate Larry’s time here and he’s the main Cardinal most people will remember, but if anything he highlights that a great WR chosen with a high pick is still a dependent position if the franchise is going to go anywhere.
I get that argument also, but while drafting Fash forecloses the possibility of MHJ, there are a handful of better-than-Hollywood WRs in every draft and we could potentially get such a player with one of our other picks.I get an argument that starts with, upgrading Humphries with Fashanu is not as impactful as upgrading Brown with MHJ
and drafting MHJ likely moves us away from getting an elite OT,...while grabbing Fash or Alt, still leaves us in position to get an elite WR prospect with either the Texans pick or pick 34.I get that argument also, but while drafting Fash forecloses the possibility of MHJ, there are a handful of better-than-Hollywood WRs in every draft and we could potentially get such a player with one of our other picks.
I don’t understand falling in love with individual prospects in general tho.
Yes and no. It seems like an offensive line can only get you so far. I get an argument that starts with, upgrading Humphries with Fashanu is not as impactful as upgrading Brown with MHJ. And we all pretty much agree that it isn't cost effective to use a 1st round pick on an interior OL player.
This is what is tough.I get that argument also, but while drafting Fash forecloses the possibility of MHJ, there are a handful of better-than-Hollywood WRs in every draft and we could potentially get such a player with one of our other picks.
I don’t understand falling in love with individual prospects in general tho.
well,... there is our trade.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
well,... there is our trade.
Yup. Pull off the 1998 draft redux where we moved from 2 to 3 and picked up a number 1 for the next season and more.What we need is for Giants to suck enough to get the 3rd pick behind us at 2. So we can get another pick out of them and still take MHJ
So lets say you cant get MHJ. You end up drafting OLU at 5 (some QB will emerge and be overdrafted)This is what is tough.
On one hand, you need multiple high level weapons to consistently succeed in the league. That X-Factor with another very good weapon beside him to transform that offense. Even if MHJR isn’t there, I believe Nabers fits this bill as well.
On the other hand, I love the thought of having a dominant OLine. I love the thought of a Nick Bosa or TJ Watt making little to no impact because they’re getting locked down on both sides at EDGE. When you’re in the playoffs, you know you’re going against multiple great/elite EDGE players. Love the thought of a OLine just taking over the game.
It’s so tough. Glad I’m not the one making that decision.
Yup.Would you trade up from the 20s to get to the early teens and draft Nabers?
Same.Yup.
Indeed... a superstar WR may put up stats, but won't help a team to a Super Bowl trophy without a franchise QB and other supporting pieces.I appreciate Larry’s time here and he’s the main Cardinal most people will remember, but if anything he highlights that a great WR chosen with a high pick is still a dependent position if the franchise is going to go anywhere.
So lets say you cant get MHJ. You end up drafting OLU at 5 (some QB will emerge and be overdrafted)
Would you trade up from the 20s to get to the early teens and draft Nabers?
Ah, moving the goal posts, I see. You want to support the QB by building the trenches and eschewing a top WR, but then circle back and change the QB. Not the discussion we were having.Wait—when did they compete without Carson Palmer and Kurt Warner at QB?
Exactly. Thank you for nailing his attempt to move the goal posts.Indeed... a superstar WR may put up stats, but won't help a team to a Super Bowl trophy without a franchise QB and other supporting pieces.
But, the entire supposition behind taking MHJ is that the team is convinced that Murray is a franchise QB. If he's not, then the team won't be taking a WR or OL, they'll be taking a QB.
So now assuming Murray is the guy we all want him to be... taking MHJ and filling in the OL and D pieces later in the draft and via FA may be a viable strategy, no?