Harry
ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Well, sadly the Cards ended up where I was afraid they might two months ago when I wrote my off-season wrap-up. They painted themselves into a corner and were stuck with Brown. It’s not that he’s a terrible tackle; he’s just not a number 5 pick. The other problem is he’s a bad fit. I didn’t like Thomas either at this spot, but he was a better fit on the left due to his speed and footwork. Brown is best suited to play right tackle, because he would not face most of the elite speed rushers on that side. That is his biggest weakness. The problem is that the right is Leinart’s back and that could be bad news as well. Grimm will improve Brown’s game, but I don’t think he can make him quicker or more agile. Brown will help the running game. That said, he needs to sustain blocks better, use his hands more and get meaner.
BTW, the Gandy acquisition harkens back to Joyce for you older Cards. He’s a versatile player who is best used as a spot starter or in a rotation. He will play most effectively at left guard and I would agree he is an upgrade over the other Brown at that position. Gandy has lost a step, but he makes up for it in guile. He helps, but he’s a temporary fix at best. He can provide some badly needed leadership and that may be his top asset.
The Branch pick in the second says this team thinks they can do what their predecessors couldn’t accomplish with Gabe Watson. That is to get an underachiever to sustain effort and not take off plays. In college this guy had a two cylinder motor. Branch is better than Watson, but not hugely so. Like the Watson pick, you win big with these choices when you win, but this strikes me as funny coming from a regime that has criticized the past group for not getting production from day two. These guys gave away the best pick on day two and maybe their second best pick on day one. It’s not a horrible call, as I am on record as saying this isn’t a deep draft and apparently the Cards agree. It will be interesting to see if they pair him with Dockett or Clancy, assuming Branch starts. If he doesn’t step up enough to start against the current group, he’s a wasted pick.
A pick you will really enjoy is Buster Davis. He has an unreal motor and really is a sideline to sideline player. I don’t think he can play on the outside, so I’m guessing the staff has doubts on Hayes in the middle. Davis is quicker than Hayes and will allow the Cards to run better stunts up the middle. The liability is that with his height, it’s hard for him to get deep enough quickly enough in zone coverage. He will be a monster on special teams. He is likely a situational player, but the guy in front of him better play at a high level or he will force the issue. I’ve watch him play 20 times or more and seen him in person. He plays faster than he times. He’s a leader. He’s the kind of guy you want on your team.
BTW, what would I have done at pick five if I was going to take Brown and no trading partner could be found? I would have let the 15 minutes expire and see what happened. Washington wouldn't have taken Brown and if it's true no one would trade up to get him (shows what they think of the pick), the Cards could have let Washington pick and saved $1.5 million in cap room.
BTW, the Gandy acquisition harkens back to Joyce for you older Cards. He’s a versatile player who is best used as a spot starter or in a rotation. He will play most effectively at left guard and I would agree he is an upgrade over the other Brown at that position. Gandy has lost a step, but he makes up for it in guile. He helps, but he’s a temporary fix at best. He can provide some badly needed leadership and that may be his top asset.
The Branch pick in the second says this team thinks they can do what their predecessors couldn’t accomplish with Gabe Watson. That is to get an underachiever to sustain effort and not take off plays. In college this guy had a two cylinder motor. Branch is better than Watson, but not hugely so. Like the Watson pick, you win big with these choices when you win, but this strikes me as funny coming from a regime that has criticized the past group for not getting production from day two. These guys gave away the best pick on day two and maybe their second best pick on day one. It’s not a horrible call, as I am on record as saying this isn’t a deep draft and apparently the Cards agree. It will be interesting to see if they pair him with Dockett or Clancy, assuming Branch starts. If he doesn’t step up enough to start against the current group, he’s a wasted pick.
A pick you will really enjoy is Buster Davis. He has an unreal motor and really is a sideline to sideline player. I don’t think he can play on the outside, so I’m guessing the staff has doubts on Hayes in the middle. Davis is quicker than Hayes and will allow the Cards to run better stunts up the middle. The liability is that with his height, it’s hard for him to get deep enough quickly enough in zone coverage. He will be a monster on special teams. He is likely a situational player, but the guy in front of him better play at a high level or he will force the issue. I’ve watch him play 20 times or more and seen him in person. He plays faster than he times. He’s a leader. He’s the kind of guy you want on your team.
BTW, what would I have done at pick five if I was going to take Brown and no trading partner could be found? I would have let the 15 minutes expire and see what happened. Washington wouldn't have taken Brown and if it's true no one would trade up to get him (shows what they think of the pick), the Cards could have let Washington pick and saved $1.5 million in cap room.