elindholm
edited for content
Someone let me know when sunsfn abandons his "Sarver is a tightwad" crusade, so I can take him off Ignore. We've gone over this so many times that I've lost count, and I can count pretty high.
hsandhu said:Yes, but if barbosa is in the deal, you're not only saving the money he makes now, but the money he would make on an extension. Also kurt thomas could be included (two years left on his contract, so minny might do that).
thegrahamcrackr said:You are also saving the guaranteed salary of the first round draft picks.
Trading Marion, Barbosa and 2 firsts for Garnett is actually a move that favors the Suns financially....
We would still have a VERY solid 7 man rotation:
Nash
Bell
Garnett
Amare
Thomas
Diaw
Jones
With our MLE to use in hopes of resigning either Tim Thomas or Eddie House (or use on another FA). Then we fill in the rest of the spots with Grant and minimum players. We would have absolutely no problems fielding a good 8 man rotation.
elindholm said:Someone let me know when sunsfn abandons his "Sarver is a tightwad" crusade, so I can take him off Ignore. We've gone over this so many times that I've lost count, and I can count pretty high.
Errntknght said:I'm not sure I quite buy DDog's assertion that he's 100% not surprised by Odom's play, but I guess I'd believe 95% not surprised.
Chaplin said:The problem with Garnett is that he never has played with a player like Amare. So when someone says that he "can't" play with Amare is full of it because they have nothing to base that opinion on. The only thing I worry about is the ego-clash which would be bound to happen. Marion did a good job of deferring last year, but I can't see Garnett doing that. At least, not right away.
jibikao said:I think KG can defer offensively to Amare/Nash. I've seen it when he played with Cassell and Mr. No Money to support my family. KG doesn't always dominate on the offense end. What I like about KG is his length, speed and versatility. KG probably won't run fast break much but he'll provide a lot more with his post up.
I still don't think it can happen and it won't happen.
Chaplin said:How can you even begin to bring up that example? Sprewell and Cassell at that time on par with Amare and Nash? Are you kidding me?
On that team, Garnett was the undisputed leader and #1 option. Would he be that on the Suns? Much harder question to answer.
thegrahamcrackr said:Chicago could put together a very good package due to their vast amount of young talent.
Garnett doesn't have a no trade clause - so the only way he would get a choice is if Taylor would give it to him. I know there is a large respect factor - but I dont know if it outweighs the franchise....
I am not worried about an ego clash at all. Garnett's nature is to defer to his teammates a lot. He is an extremely unselfish player. It isn't like Amare is the leader of the team anyways. This is without a doubt Nash's team. Not to mention the skill sets of Amare and Garnett are perfect compliments.....
Sunsfn - you are just talking out of your ass now. Sarver does not want to lose money, like any business man. He isn't going to take a Mark Cuban approach. That does NOT mean that he cares more about the bottom line than winning. The guy is an egomaniac, but he has still proven that he will pony up the cash if the move makes sense. And like we have pointed out, the deal stated above puts the Suns in a better place financially.
hsandhu said:True, but I don't believe shaq had a no-trade clause either. Superstars can dicate where they are moved.
Chaplin said:Joe--am I not reading this correctly? Perhaps I implied more than what was there, but simple sentence comprehension dictates that you
think that Odom is a better player.
Shawn Marion says:
“It’s not me,” he said. “I gotta get the ball.
“You can put it on me all you want to, but I’m here to play. I only can control one thing, my energy on the floor. I can’t control anything else.”
elindholm said:How come Marion is the only rotation player who complains about his involvement in the offense? This is getting old, fast.
Chaplin said:So you're saying that THEORETICALLY, Lamar Odom is a better player than Shawn Marion. I disagree because there are good players and there are great players--some good players are not capable of being great, and Odom is one of them--stirring mostly from their work ethic and mental intelligence about the game of basketball.
thegrahamcrackr said:Sunsfn - you are just talking out of your ass now. Sarver does not want to lose money, like any business man. He isn't going to take a Mark Cuban approach. That does NOT mean that he cares more about the bottom line than winning. The guy is an egomaniac, but he has still proven that he will pony up the cash if the move makes sense. And like we have pointed out, the deal stated above puts the Suns in a better place financially.