pokerface
ASFN Addict
- Joined
- May 20, 2004
- Posts
- 5,369
- Reaction score
- 807
You said the Suns lied. How can they have lied if his microfractured knee was fine? They never said that overcompensation wouldn't be a problem. In fact, they never mentioned it at all.
Yeah they dont ever mention any potential complications. They just throw "pie in the sky" estimates out there and run with it. People in the know are aware of such complications....that was just one of them. It was said by a therapist on this board that many times when a person has microfractue done on one knee they end up needing the procedure done on the other knee as well....that was said by the poster long before his other knee flared up so its seems right on to me.
Also you're just assuming Amares microfracture knee was "just fine". I bet many a doctor out there would have preferred Amare take more time off than just 5 months. Name other NBA players that came back from microfracture in 5 months and were just fine. You can't.
I'd like to see your link to where the Suns said he would be 100% in 4-5 months. I know they said they will try to see where he is in 4-5 months and it will be up to him whether to go or not, assuming there were no problems with the microfractured knee. And there wasn't.
Why must I produce links when its common knowledge that the Suns said Amare would return around allstar break. Its also common knowledge that they said they wouldn't bring Amare back until he's 100%. Chaplin you can add 2+2 cant you? They made these statements seperate from each other but both were made. It amounts to them saying "We're going to bring Amare back in 5 months and he'll be 100%".