Krangodnzr
Captain of Team Conner
Listen lets just call it like it is. I don't think Karlos Dansby is nearly as good as you do. I don't feel like he was the run stopper you seem to think he was and I certainly don't think its crazy to think Washington will be better at getting to the QB with his speed.
I think this is national perception as well. I live here in Miami and I get the feeling many educated fans here are going to look at Karlos having middling numbers on a middling defense and wonder "Why the hell are we paying this guy all this money?" and the refrains about his excellent coverage skills, injuries, or being a defensive leader will be of little solace.
Thats only if (as I expect) the reason isn't apparent because he gets lazy after cashing in and enjoying South Beach likely more then he should.
To me Dansby was one of the better coverage LB's in the NFL. But he wasn't the "overall" prospect you seem to think he was. Thats why for what he did for this defense, I think Washington will be able to excel like Dansby in coverage and maybe even intime he will diagnose better and be a faster version, at least from what I have seen on tape.
I liked him from the beginning and if you want to talk about a prospect who has little impressive video and made his name on a combine performance, it is Weatherspoon.
I like Lee, but find his physical skill unremarkable and feel he would have been exposed in coverage. Keep in mind the WILB is the position we are replacing.
But we can leave it that. These are all opinions and it seems like the coaching staff seems to side with what I see as well so its not like I am the only one seeing what I want to see. We'll discuss midway through the season and see where he is at. I imagine Dansby will have a quick impact and Washington will take time to adjust, but I am confident enough in the coaching staff that we will see enough good from Washington to know he was the right pick.
Agree 100%
Dansby was good, but I always felt something was missing in his game. People remember the interceptions and sacks, but forget watching a 250 lb WILB getting pushed around in the run game. As a larger ILB, he was NEVER good taking on blocks and frequently ran around them. His game is flawed, but his other skills make him still a very good, not great player.
Ultimately, Washington will probably be a similar player, at a fraction of the the cost. And the obvious faith the organization has in him, and how much they value him makes me believe in him more. This isn't the Cardinals of the Tobin/Mac era, this team doesn't draft for need at every pick, if they believe in a player they're not afraid to make a move to get that player, and have an actual draft strategy that works. I also believe in the coaching ability and the strength and conditioning staff, which leads me to believe that any player we draft WILL get better.
I know K9 keeps comparing Washington to Ray Thompson (who was around 215 when we drafted him). That's ignoring objective facts: 1. The Whiz coaching staff develops players talents. 2. John Lott develops players physically. 3. The overall talent level of the team has improved dramatically since the days of Ray Thompson (and thus players can perform better since they don't have to worry about everyone around them sucking).
Finally, KARLOS DANSBY IS ONE OF (IF NOT THE) HIGHEST PAID LINEBACKERS IN THE LEAGUE! He isn't worth that kind of cheddar, I know that, K9 probably knows that, and the Janitors working at University of Phoenix know that. Daryl Washington is the closest player to Karlos Dansby since Karlos Dansby and I'm pleased as punch that the Cardinals didn't sit back and let one of the guys they zeroed in on get out of their grasp!