An *Inconsistent* 3pt shooter, yeah he is
I'll take an "inconsistent" 0.409 career 3 point shooter any day of the week and twice on Sundays.
An *Inconsistent* 3pt shooter, yeah he is
I've been positive to starting Barnes at small forward and letting Hill run the second unit since we signed Barnes.
I might over estimate how good Barnes is, but my thinking is we have enough starters who need the ball as it is with Amare, Nash and Shaq, so Barnes is better used as a 3 point shooter, rebounder and slasher with that group.
Hill can dominate the ball and let Diaw and Barbosa play off it with the second unit. That means more rest and more effective minutes when he's on the floor. Coach has to manage his minutes so he stays warm like Nash and his sore back.
Barbosa's three is a big part of his attraction, but hardly the only one. It is very hard for opponents to guard him when he's rested because he has a very quick first step and is one of the fastest players in the league WHEN DRIBBLEING THE BALL. (Lots of guys can run up and down the court, but slow down when they have to dribble the ball.
IMHO, he has a slowish release and a flat trajectory. This means guys can play off of him somewhat, but it is hard to deal with him if he's "on".
He's actually pretty good as a cutter but was not used that way as much as I'd like
When it comes to offense, what I'd like to see is:
1. Better recognition of weakside defense: He needs to know when he can't get to the basket so he kick the ball out before getting into trouble.
2. Better mid range shot: Everyone knows he's going to try to take it to the basket. Mid range shots are always wide open and much easier than trying to throw the ball over seven foooters.
3. Make "up fakes" before taking off to the basket.
4. Pass the ball to open teammates: Leandro is far to guilty of "tunnel vision" to ever be a point guard, but he should learn to at least be somewhat more aware of the court.
My "dream" is that Porter can get somewhat better defensive technique from Leandro. Perhaps getting away from "trying" to be a point guard will help simplify what he's working on. We can only hope.
LB's slow release and low release point on his shot create problems for points 2,3. After all who cares if he "upfakes" if he cant get his shot off quickly, and what mid range pull up shot works with a slow release and low release point?
LB upfaking a jumper is like Boris Diaw faking a shot. Most defenders are taught to play LB to drive and bother the shot while playing off of him. With Diaw, they play the pass, as he has not proven he is a threat shooting and likes to pass even when driving to the hoop. The only to overcome these defensive strategies is for LB to get a quick release and Diaw to take and make shots.
Starting Barnes makes a lot of sense
September 22nd, 2008, 12:46 pm · 1 Comment · posted by jerrybrown
Whether the decision has been made already — and the beans were spilled by team president Rick Welts at a recent function — or is yet to be determined until training camp, starting Matt Barnes over Grant Hill at small forward makes sense on many levels.
In fact, the only reasons to keep Hill in the starting five are (1) seniority/respect and (2) the fear that you can only heat up Hill so many times a night and it doesn’t make sense to create another scenario each night. But if Hill is going to play far less minutes this season (as is the plan), not starting him goes along with that mindset.
Why start Barnes? Let us count the ways:
*It gives the Suns two (count ‘em, two) starters in their 20s, and a more athletic team out of the gate.
*The Suns need one more 3-point shooter, and Barnes is the closest thing to that among the new players. It makes sense to have him on the floor with Nash, so the Suns can spread the floor with Bell and Barnes on the wings and give Shaquille O’Neal and, specifically, Amare Stoudemire plenty of room to work in the paint. Hill proved last season that his 3-pointer is uncomfortable and inconsistent.
*Barnes is a better rebounder and runs the floor well, the closest thing on the roster (albeit a far cry) to providing the attributes lost with Shawn Marion’s departure.
*Hill coming off the bench gives the Suns another good ballhandler to help Goran Dragic during his minutes on the floor. With Dragic, Hill and/or Boris Diaw on the floor the adjustment curve is easier for Dragic. And he will be playing more against bench players, giving him an advantage in the basketball IQ category.
*Barnes is a solid defender, especially guarding small forwards, and would get a chance to keep good shooters from getting an early rhythm. His defense might earn him some time late in games, but Hill’s smarts (ability to draw fouls and keep away from committing them) and free throw shooting will get him the nod more often than not.
*And if Hill does miss time due to injury, replacing a bench player doesn’t affect as many people, rotation-wise.
All in all, as long as Hill is on board with the program, starting Barnes seems a good fit.
Yup, instant offense. But not a starter and not a closer. That's his best contribution to the Suns. That's his only strong contribution.I remember when LB checked into the game in past playoffs that sometimes it changed the momentum and speed of the game in our favor. He is very valuable in that regard. I only hope his confidence is better so we can pull him rather quick if he's not on, but it takes a certain type of player to be like that (microwave, heats up in a hurry).
I've been looking at stats to see if perhaps fatigue was a factor in Barbos'as decline in shooting percentage. I couldn't find anything to point to it either way. What did stand out was that in the 12 games Barbosa came off the bench, he averaged 44.7% from the field ant 37.0% but when starting he averaged 52.9% and 46.9% for three.
No doubt. A big reason i like the decision to put Barnes in there w/Nash and bring Hill off the bench. Hill doesn't need Nash to get himself(Hill) good shots whereas IMO barnes would struggle to score without Steve there to create for him.Yeah with nash running the offense everybody gets better, more open shots. Just ask JJ who shot 47% next to nash, he'll never sniff that again.
the kicker with LB is that when heavily defended he can nbe stopped from 3 funneled to the hoop and the defensive big man. If he had a good pull up, he'd be insane, but he doesnt have that. If only the suns had a coach that could help him get it, but I dont know who that would be.
A couple of years ago when Dan D' was coaching him intensively, Leandro was showing flashes of a promising mid-range game. Last year absolutely nada. I expect he never got to the point where he was comfortable in mid range and, in the regular season, he gets along quite well without it. Major coaching blunder not to insist that he not only keep shooting it but expanding it - so when he gets into the playoffs and needs the mid range game, its ready to rock and roll.
Another thing that disappeared was his cuts to the hoop. Teams got onto that early baseline cut from the left corner, as NBA teams will do when you overdo one play, so he abandoned the whole concept. What a coaching staff!
No doubt. A big reason i like the decision to put Barnes in there w/Nash and bring Hill off the bench. Hill doesn't need Nash to get himself(Hill) good shots whereas IMO barnes would struggle to score without Steve there to create for him.