I don't think Gabbert will amount to much but I'm fine with kicking the tires and seeing if there is anything there. Especially at the price that they got him for.
For now, mostly because Stanton is BA's love child. We'll see what happens after he is on the roster with Stanton.BG is not in competition with Stanton...only with dysart
I don't mind the signing. I think he has a very slim chance against Stanton, but could hang on as the third QB.
The Stanton hate makes me laugh. He's highly regarded in NFL circles, has a winning record for us... but this board hates him.
I don't think the board hates him. I think in limited action the last two years he has been terrible. The stats don't lie..
You must be registered for see images attach
I don't think the board hates him. I think in limited action the last two years he has been terrible. The stats don't lie..
You must be registered for see images attach
Gabbert had more starts and better stats as a 21 year old rookie, though. In Jacksonville without training camp to prepare.
Compared to what set of data? He completed 50% of his passes.
The guy is 9-31 in his career. Those are absolutely atrocious numbers, even though I don't like to point to wins as a solely QB stat.
Meh. Don't see the downside of the move. I think he fits better than Kaep.
Nor should you or anyone based on the horrible teams he played on. Give the man a chance.Those are absolutely atrocious numbers, even though I don't like to point to wins as a solely QB stat.
so let's see 9-31 means 40 games in 6 years. That's 6.6 games a year, on 2 of the worst teams in the league. But, because he couldn't somehow turn those ships (hulks ? Wrecks ?) around, he is irretrievably bad. That seems to be your statement.
Maybe he is that bad, maybe he will bloom in the desert. I don't know the answer to that and neither do you. I suspect that even he doesn't know that. They are simply taking a low cost chance on someone they see something in. If it doesn't pan out, so what ? It's a cheap experiment. None of us will know before a pre-season game or two. The organization will know long before that.
so let's see 9-31 means 40 games in 6 years. That's 6.6 games a year, on 2 of the worst teams in the league. But, because he couldn't somehow turn those ships (hulks ? Wrecks ?) around, he is irretrievably bad. That seems to be your statement.
Maybe he is that bad, maybe he will bloom in the desert. I don't know the answer to that and neither do you. I suspect that even he doesn't know that. They are simply taking a low cost chance on someone they see something in. If it doesn't pan out, so what ? It's a cheap experiment. None of us will know before a pre-season game or two. The organization will know long before that.
Not sure how you get the bolded from his post. The second part of your post I agree with. Doesn't hurt to see what he's got. If he's a dud release him. If he's a better back up than Stanton we got a good deal.
+1Vet minimum to sign a 3rd string QB, who is still 27?
That is a very good pickup and move if you ask me. He is better than Ryan Lindley, and RELATIVE TO 3rd STRING QB'S IN NFL, that is a good signing, and good depth.
Plus it is competition for Drew Stanton, which is needed.
If BA (and Moore) can so this, he deserves another coach of the year award.Insurance policy in case Stanton leaves next year. Gives him a year to learn the system. Hopefully they can coach the Jacksonville & Chip Kelly out of him.
Go Cards!!!