Bobcats Own Lakers

joshstmarie

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Posts
1,671
Reaction score
1
Location
Seattle
Seriously, he has a few good games and people are questioning the trade. Diaw SUCKED as a Sun.

right. like how he stuffed stats in 2006 w/amare out. im glad you all have figured out how to use emoticons. thats clever.
 
Last edited:

Ninjafish

Registered
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Posts
610
Reaction score
0
Seriously, he has a few good games and people are questioning the trade. Diaw SUCKED as a Sun.

Please read the entire thread, you idiot. This has already been proved to be wrong.
 

Ninjafish

Registered
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Posts
610
Reaction score
0
Sorry, cheerleading posts that don't add anything are just really really annoying.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,462
Reaction score
16,990
Location
Round Rock, TX
Wow..
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images

Does anyone else find it funny that this guy comes on here now after Boris and Raja have a couple good games for Charlotte, and yet he was nowhere to be found when they were stinking it up before the trade and ALL OF LAST YEAR.
 

Ninjafish

Registered
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Posts
610
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty sure I defended them before the trade and said I didn't like the trade when it happened.

So you agree with that post? You think Boris was a cancer? Or turning into one? Yeah, that was a real reasonable post to make.
 

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
Does anyone else find it funny that this guy comes on here now after Boris and Raja have a couple good games for Charlotte, and yet he was nowhere to be found when they were stinking it up before the trade and ALL OF LAST YEAR.
No doubt, and there are also a few long time posters here that seem to convieniently show up only when the SUNS are on any kind of a losing streak....and are nowhere to be found when there are good things going on. They know who they are.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,541
Reaction score
9,821
Location
L.A. area
This has already been proved to be wrong.

By what, your per48 analysis, in which you demonstrated Diaw to be slightly better than Matt Barnes?

You haven't proved anything. All you did was cite some statistics which turned out not even to support your point.
 

Ninjafish

Registered
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Posts
610
Reaction score
0
By what, your per48 analysis, in which you demonstrated Diaw to be slightly better than Matt Barnes?

You haven't proved anything. All you did was cite some statistics which turned out not even to support your point.

I don't think anyone here thinks that Barnes has been sucking this season, so I'm not sure what the point is of comparing Diaw to Barnes, to show that Diaw sucked.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,462
Reaction score
16,990
Location
Round Rock, TX
I don't think anyone here thinks that Barnes has been sucking this season, so I'm not sure what the point is of comparing Diaw to Barnes, to show that Diaw sucked.

Barnes has been AWFUL since the JRich trade. You watch the games, right?
 

Ninjafish

Registered
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Posts
610
Reaction score
0
Barnes has been AWFUL since the JRich trade. You watch the games, right?

Yep, but we're not talking about Barnes since the trade. We're comparing Barnes's season averages. If you want, I could find Barnes's stats since the trade and put them up against Diaw when he was here.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,541
Reaction score
9,821
Location
L.A. area
I don't think anyone here thinks that Barnes has been sucking this season, so I'm not sure what the point is of comparing Diaw to Barnes, to show that Diaw sucked.

Diaw's salary is almost ten times as high. No one would be complaining if Diaw had been on a minimum contract. The question is whether he was performing at anywhere near his salary or evident talent level, and the answer is clearly No.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,160
Reaction score
70,337
I still can't believe so many people have SO MUCH love for players and coaches... that never even reached the Finals... never even sniffed a deciding game to go to the Finals and never even sniffed the WCFs it's last two years.

The love affair with the DA era just makes so little sense to me. I mean, it was fun and all, but it never even gave us that great Conference Championship moment like the Barkley team did in 1993. I mean, that team had 300,000 people come out to cheer them just for getting to 2nd place. The DA teams? Meh. Fun, but disposable and they had run their course. move on folks. it wasn't that great of a run that we had.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,462
Reaction score
16,990
Location
Round Rock, TX
Yep, but we're not talking about Barnes since the trade. We're comparing Barnes's season averages. If you want, I could find Barnes's stats since the trade and put them up against Diaw when he was here.

But you are aware your main point is based on Diaw's stats POST-trade, right? We can talk about season averages all day, but where were you before the trade when Diaw was stinking it up nightly? Oh, and "I probably supported him before the trade" isn't a real answer.
 

AceP

Registered
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Posts
941
Reaction score
0
Barnes has been AWFUL since the JRich trade. You watch the games, right?

Yes, Barnes has been really aweful since then. But I think it's due to his move to reserve. He was great starting in Oct and Nov, when he has plenty of playing time and shots to find his shooting touch. Now his minutes is very inconsistent, and so is his role.
 

Ninjafish

Registered
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Posts
610
Reaction score
0
Diaw's salary is almost ten times as high. No one would be complaining if Diaw had been on a minimum contract. The question is whether he was performing at anywhere near his salary or evident talent level, and the answer is clearly No.

He wasn't really given the minutes to perform to his salary, but saying that he was worthless or that he sucked is just a flat out lie. I mean, the man shot 57% with us. Per 48, his efficiency is higher than JRich's right now. Whether or not he was being overpaid or not for the production we allowed him to give is a different argument entirely.

As for that argument, the salaries involved in the trade were pretty close to being even, so if you believe (as I do) that we would be better with Bell and Diaw now than JRich, the money should be considered a non issue.
 
Last edited:

Ninjafish

Registered
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Posts
610
Reaction score
0
But you are aware your main point is based on Diaw's stats POST-trade, right?

Nope, the argument is ALLLL about Diaw pre-trade.

Let's go ahead and compare Barnes right now to what Diaw was doing before the trade.

Here's Barnes in the month of January.
21 mins, 6.2 pts, 5 rebounds, 1.5 assists, 1.8 TOs, 2.5 fouls, .323 FG, .213 3P%

Here's Diaw's stats pre-trade.
25 mins, 8.3 pts, 3.8 rebounds, 2.1 assists, 1.7 TOs, 1.8 fouls, .567 FG%, .357 3P%

57% to 32%. Do you really want to compare that? Are you kidding me?
 

Sovereignz

Registered
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Posts
399
Reaction score
0
I have no desire to read 5 pages of stuff about Boris Diaw, but hopefully someone pointed out that he averages a whopping 15/7 on 45 percent shooting with a bunch of turnovers in 38 minutes as the focal point of an offense. He also shoots free throws worse than Shaq. Yeah. Yes, he's a great passer and post defender. He's still a huge underachiever wildly inconsistent and a passionless french fruit. Good riddance.
 

AceP

Registered
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Posts
941
Reaction score
0
I have no desire to read 5 pages of stuff about Boris Diaw, but hopefully someone pointed out that he averages a whopping 15/7 on 45 percent shooting with a bunch of turnovers in 38 minutes as the focal point of an offense. He also shoots free throws worse than Shaq. Yeah. Yes, he's a great passer and post defender. He's still a huge underachiever wildly inconsistent and a passionless french fruit. Good riddance.

Very accurate Point. I really don't see why we r still talking so much about Diaw on this forum. He is gone! And we all know the conclusion about him.

A. NOT good enough to play starting PF in a team who want to contend, like us.

B. Bad attitude when playing alongside super-stars, very passive, often cruising.

C. Too expensive to be a reserve.

D. Chemistry problem with new coach and new teammates.


He had to go, and I'm so glad he's gone!
 

Suns_fan69

Official ASFN Lurker
Joined
Oct 2, 2002
Posts
3,667
Reaction score
2,065
Location
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Back to the original topic:

Looks like Gerald Wallace suffered a partially collapsed lung as a result of Bynums elbow to the chest. Hard foul or dirty play? You be the judge: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3866849

My opinion? Similar to the Horry play on Nash that by the time Bynum realized he wasn't in the position to make a proper play on the ball he decided to go for a hard foul instead. Malicious? Probably not in the 'intent to injure' sense but should warrant a 1 or 2 game suspension from a 'be wary of your actions' standpoint.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,462
Reaction score
16,990
Location
Round Rock, TX
Nope, the argument is ALLLL about Diaw pre-trade.

Let's go ahead and compare Barnes right now to what Diaw was doing before the trade.

Here's Barnes in the month of January.
21 mins, 6.2 pts, 5 rebounds, 1.5 assists, 1.8 TOs, 2.5 fouls, .323 FG, .213 3P%

Here's Diaw's stats pre-trade.
25 mins, 8.3 pts, 3.8 rebounds, 2.1 assists, 1.7 TOs, 1.8 fouls, .567 FG%, .357 3P%

57% to 32%. Do you really want to compare that? Are you kidding me?

I don't know why you're even comparing Barnes to Diaw in the first place. On the Phoenix Suns, they were comparable players--meaning Diaw was paid 10 times more than a guy that produced about the same. Who the hell is comparing Diaw post-trade and Barnes pre-trade? That doesn't make any sense except for you to use it as flimsy reasoning to proclaim Diaw is this star player.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
Very accurate Point. I really don't see why we r still talking so much about Diaw on this forum. He is gone! And we all know the conclusion about him.

A. NOT good enough to play starting PF in a team who want to contend, like us.

B. Bad attitude when playing alongside super-stars, very passive, often cruising.

C. Too expensive to be a reserve.

D. Chemistry problem with new coach and new teammates.


He had to go, and I'm so glad he's gone!


Spot on! As a featured player, he could make an average or below-average team into an above average, provided he is motivated. But that team is not to contend for much in the NBA! :bang:
 

AceP

Registered
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Posts
941
Reaction score
0
Back to the original topic:

Looks like Gerald Wallace suffered a partially collapsed lung as a result of Bynums elbow to the chest. Hard foul or dirty play? You be the judge: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3866849

My opinion? Similar to the Horry play on Nash that by the time Bynum realized he wasn't in the position to make a proper play on the ball he decided to go for a hard foul instead. Malicious? Probably not in the 'intent to injure' sense but should warrant a 1 or 2 game suspension from a 'be wary of your actions' standpoint.

WOW. It is a VERY DIRTY action! Bynum raised his elbow so high, way above his head, deliberately pointed to Wallace's chest.

Look at the result! Wallace had 30 to 40 percent of his left lung collapse as /well as a non-displaced fracture of the fifth rib. Sounds very scary! If I were Wallace, I'd sue Bynum for assulting and personal harm.
 
Top