Hmmm I think he is done, poor work ethic when he is not getting his touches. Still might be a cheaper alternative to Warick or Childress to take up bench space next year.
I may be one of the few that actually really liked Diaw when he was here. I thought he was very versatile.
How come people say he has poor work ethnic? He gained weight? And...?
I may be one of the few that actually really liked Diaw when he was here. I thought he was very versatile.
How come people say he has poor work ethnic? He gained weight? And...?
I've had my fill of Diaw. The Suns should be looking at younger players for the future.
I'm surprised you'd write him off considering you were in favor of bringing in Turiaf. Diaw is only 9 months older than Ronny and IMO fits our style of play better, is much more familiar with our style of play and on his good days is a much better player than Turiaf. If there's a young guy in the NBDL that looks like he can offer what we need I'd be in favor of going that route but if I had to choose between Turiaf and Diaw, I'd take Boris in a flash. I've been one of Frye's biggest supporters around here but he's really hurt us at times this year and Boris would give us an option that we currently lack.
Steve
If the Suns were wanting to make a legitimate run for the playoffs, Ronny Turiaf would make them stronger at the PF position. He can bang with the best of them and is a space eater. He was waived by the Nuggets.
As I viewed it, the Suns looking at Turiaf would have been based upon... if the Suns were wanting to make a legitimate playoff run. See by quote from another thread below.
Now it looks like the Suns would be better off forgetting the whole playoff thing. Mentioning Turiaf was a "what if" situation. Now Turiaf is off the market and Nash is doing his best Diaw imitation by his reluctance to shoot. Any players the Suns bring in now should be looking towards the future. The Suns winning streak was some nice tasting kool-aid.
Please no Diaw. Been there, done that. His reluctance to shoot appears to be one of the reasons he was waived. See what Silas had to say in the linked ESPN article.
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/7...ats-waive-boris-diaw-agreeing-contract-buyout
As I viewed it, the Suns looking at Turiaf would have been based upon... if the Suns were wanting to make a legitimate playoff run. See by quote from another thread below.
Now it looks like the Suns would be better off forgetting the whole playoff thing. Mentioning Turiaf was a "what if" situation. Now Turiaf is off the market and Nash is doing his best Diaw imitation by his reluctance to shoot. Any players the Suns bring in now should be looking towards the future. The Suns winning streak was some nice tasting kool-aid.
Please no Diaw. Been there, done that. His reluctance to shoot appears to be one of the reasons he was waived. See what Silas had to say in the linked ESPN article.
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/7...ats-waive-boris-diaw-agreeing-contract-buyout
Yup, ignorance (or stupidity) is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.Been there, done that.
Yup, ignorance (or stupidity) is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
If I had the power to outlaw one phrase it would be this one. It gets used almost daily here as if it had some special relevance to every situation. Sometimes, you have to keep doing the same thing so that you develop proficiency in it. Sometimes you do something like bringing Diaw back because even though he's been here before, the story has changed.
Steve
The song remains the same.
If I had the power to outlaw one phrase it would be this one. It gets used almost daily here as if it had some special relevance to every situation. Sometimes, you have to keep doing the same thing so that you develop proficiency in it. Sometimes you do something like bringing Diaw back because even though he's been here before, the story has changed.
Steve
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
I'll go with the quote attributed to Albert Einstein on this one.
I've tried doing the above and I do believe (unless there are variables), Einstein was right.
Heck, if I had brains I'd be just like Albert Einstein.
I am very familiar with the quote and I've used it myself BUT it doesn't apply to every situation (far from it). Repetition is often the cornerstone of proficiency. If you broadly apply that quote you'd give up long before you mastered anything. The trick is knowing when to give it up.
Also, in the real world, you rarely do the same exact thing. There are too many variables involved to just assume that bringing back a player will produce the same results (positively or negatively). I think that quote makes a lot of sense in the controlled environment that scientists hope to function in but that's where it ends. It has more comedic value in the day to day world than anything else, IMO.
Steve
I'll go with the quote attributed to Albert Einstein on this one.