Mitch
Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
This is what drives me crazy about the Cardinals' front office. They still haven't addressed some of the more conspicuous vulnerabilities on their roster. STILL.
Sure---the Cardinals were aggressive in acquiring QB Kevin Kolb and TE Todd Heap---and I believe they did well in signing a cadre of solid B level UFAs. That's all well and good.
However---why can't they just once finish the job?
Points in Case:
1. Offensive Tackle.
Everyone in the NFL knows the Cardinals are weak at the tackles and especially at left tackle. Everyone except the Bidwills, Rod Graves and Ken Whisenhunt. It makes no sense not to have an insurance policy to protect the new franchise QB.
2. Outside Linebacker.
Aside from acquiring a QB, it was clear to the NFL world that the Cardinals need edge rushers (almost every draft pundit had the Cardinals taking a QB or OLB/DE---for a reason). Year after year the Cardinals do not---for whatever the reasons---do all they can to bring one or two legitimate edge threats in. The hope is they will get lucky with 4th round draft picks O'Brien Schofield and Sam Acho. Both are young, inexperienced and unproven. Both have upside. But, both may not even start because the Cardinals are still holding onto two ex-Steelers who are years past their primes.
Note: their lack of good edge rushers is one of the reasons why the Cardinals' offensive tackles struggle. The tackles can't practice against the real thing---so any time they see a very good edge rusher, the Cardinal tackles are unprepared and understandably unconfident. In essence they become overwhelmed.
3. Nose Tackle.
Sorry---but you cannot trust in the decision that the Cardinals' backup DEs are capable of jumping into the NT rotation---just as the Cardinals asked Bryan Robinson to do, only as a token starter. Plus, Dan Williams has stamina issues which makes it all the more key to have a good backup who is actually a NT and not a DE fill-in.
This just in: the Cardinals are a 34 defense. 34 defense all start with the NT. How many years has it been?
4. Running Back.
With the recent trading of Tim Hightower and the release of William Powell, the Cardinals are facing the exact same absence of RB depth/options they faced last year in pre-season---which caused the coaches to play a hobbling Beanie Wells deep into the second halfs. It got so bad last pre-season the Cardinals made a boneheaded trade with the Eagles to bring in RB Charles Scott, just so they could pound him into the line for the 4th pre-season game and then cut him.
There are currently 4 RBs on the roster: Beanie Wells, Ryan Williams, LaRod Stephens-Howling and Alfonso Smith. Imo, Wells, Williams nor LSH should play in the second halfs of pre-season games 1,2 & 4. So what are the coaches going to do? Pound the ball with the slight but speedy Alfonso Smith for entire halfs? There is no reason whatsoever to give LSH more than 3 carries a pre-season game. And this year they had better keep Beanie injury-free and fresh.
The Plan:
The Cardinals talk about a plan. We have seen parts of a plan come to fruition. But if the plan includes---once again---ignoring key areas of need---then the plan is once again unacceptable...and the sign once again of a losing organization.
Sure---the Cardinals were aggressive in acquiring QB Kevin Kolb and TE Todd Heap---and I believe they did well in signing a cadre of solid B level UFAs. That's all well and good.
However---why can't they just once finish the job?
Points in Case:
1. Offensive Tackle.
Everyone in the NFL knows the Cardinals are weak at the tackles and especially at left tackle. Everyone except the Bidwills, Rod Graves and Ken Whisenhunt. It makes no sense not to have an insurance policy to protect the new franchise QB.
2. Outside Linebacker.
Aside from acquiring a QB, it was clear to the NFL world that the Cardinals need edge rushers (almost every draft pundit had the Cardinals taking a QB or OLB/DE---for a reason). Year after year the Cardinals do not---for whatever the reasons---do all they can to bring one or two legitimate edge threats in. The hope is they will get lucky with 4th round draft picks O'Brien Schofield and Sam Acho. Both are young, inexperienced and unproven. Both have upside. But, both may not even start because the Cardinals are still holding onto two ex-Steelers who are years past their primes.
Note: their lack of good edge rushers is one of the reasons why the Cardinals' offensive tackles struggle. The tackles can't practice against the real thing---so any time they see a very good edge rusher, the Cardinal tackles are unprepared and understandably unconfident. In essence they become overwhelmed.
3. Nose Tackle.
Sorry---but you cannot trust in the decision that the Cardinals' backup DEs are capable of jumping into the NT rotation---just as the Cardinals asked Bryan Robinson to do, only as a token starter. Plus, Dan Williams has stamina issues which makes it all the more key to have a good backup who is actually a NT and not a DE fill-in.
This just in: the Cardinals are a 34 defense. 34 defense all start with the NT. How many years has it been?
4. Running Back.
With the recent trading of Tim Hightower and the release of William Powell, the Cardinals are facing the exact same absence of RB depth/options they faced last year in pre-season---which caused the coaches to play a hobbling Beanie Wells deep into the second halfs. It got so bad last pre-season the Cardinals made a boneheaded trade with the Eagles to bring in RB Charles Scott, just so they could pound him into the line for the 4th pre-season game and then cut him.
There are currently 4 RBs on the roster: Beanie Wells, Ryan Williams, LaRod Stephens-Howling and Alfonso Smith. Imo, Wells, Williams nor LSH should play in the second halfs of pre-season games 1,2 & 4. So what are the coaches going to do? Pound the ball with the slight but speedy Alfonso Smith for entire halfs? There is no reason whatsoever to give LSH more than 3 carries a pre-season game. And this year they had better keep Beanie injury-free and fresh.
The Plan:
The Cardinals talk about a plan. We have seen parts of a plan come to fruition. But if the plan includes---once again---ignoring key areas of need---then the plan is once again unacceptable...and the sign once again of a losing organization.
Last edited: