kerouac9
Klowned by Keim
Good to see that our streak of immediate buyer's remorse on free agents stands and is extended another year.
Good to see that our streak of immediate buyer's remorse on free agents stands and is extended another year.
Good to see that our streak of immediate buyer's remorse on free agents stands and is extended another year.
So true. If the contracts were structured to save us any cap room, I assume we'd see Snyder and/or Colledge released too. King was pretty bad both blocking and receiving last year too. This team has been a disaster in free agency.
Like Keim said, it can be a trap.
Does that include money set aside for the rookie pool? Or will that $3-4 million have to come out of the new $5.8 Million surplus?Stew and Gay saves 7 mill towards the cap. We were 1.2 over it yesterday.
We are currently 5.8 mill under the cap.
No shock here with these cuts. Easy way to free up cap space.
Bradley was worthless and needed to go.
Gay was expendable and freed up a bunch of cash. CB has become one of the deepest positions in FA this year and we should have no problem finding a replacement.
Those were easy. Now the real hard decisions are left as to who stays and who goes.
Does that include money set aside for the rookie pool? Or will that $3-4 million have to come out of the new $5.8 Million surplus?
My understanding is our rookie pool will be ~6MM. Which means any surplus we have currently is already spoken for. If we want to sign any FAs including our own, we need to clear significantly more cap space. Easy peezy:
- extend Rhodes
- restructure Fitz
- cut Kolb
- cut Doucet
- cut Wilson
Fitz's salary is only $5M in 2013, but his cap number for 2014-2017 is greater than $18M each year. Re-structuring Fitz would be a pretty profoundly terrible idea.
Extending Rhodes sounds easier than it could be. You're going to have to pay him $7M this season to get him to sign, and then commit to him for an additional 3 years at--say--$4M per year. You can structure it to fit, but it's going to be a challenge in a very short time frame.
Do you think he can get a 4 year 19M package on the open market?
-I love Rhodes. IMO, he's our most underrated player. I hope we can extend him
-I also really like Toler. He was starting to look good opposite DRC, then got hurt before getting his shot with PP. Horton IMO made a bad choice going with Gay over Toler early in the season, but Toler may have still been having trouble rehabbing or something that I don't know about
-Cutting AW is a step backwards in our franchise's credibility to fans IMO. It goes back to the no loyalty, cheap-ass same old cards approach. This guy gave everything to this organization. He's got gas left in the tank too. Do something so he can retire here, where he belongs
-Beanie is the trickiest for me. I don't know what terms he and the FO are on. Would he be a distraction? Can we keep him healthy? The kid can run. But all the injuries aren't a good sign for longevity
-Kolb. The most important contract to deal with. I still believe he CAN be a franchise QB if we keep him upright. So with better blocking, and a run game, and maybe in some strange miracle the team learning to run a screen, he still has that potential to lead this team. BUT, from what he actually has produced, and what he's been paid, he should play 2013 for free. He doesn't stay at current numbers
-Colledge. I really like the guy. He seems great for the team. But he hasn't exactly been a stellar performer every week. Would love to see him re-work his contract so we can keep him and we can try to acquire more pieces to build a winner
-Doucet can go
The best franchises do this all the time. Look at the Ravens with Ed Reed and the Packers with Charles Woodson. I would hate seeing AW go, but it's a business.
Each of these moves have (or at least should have) a "Page 2."Or Hines Ward being Cut by Pitt, Eagles not making an effort to re-sign Brian Dawkins, the list is long. So to say it would be a step backwards, or same old cheap Cards is straight up nonsensical.
The best franchises do this all the time. Look at the Ravens with Ed Reed and the Packers with Charles Woodson. I would hate seeing AW go, but it's a business.
Ed Reed:Ravens is not Adrian Wilson:Cardinals. Ray Lewis is who is the comparison. Reed is a phenomenal player, but didn't have the impact on the entire organization off-field as well, like AW/RL
I love AW, but he's far from being the franchise player you assert him to be; and the Ray Lewis comparison is a bit ridiculous.