RON_IN_OC
https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Does anyone know if yesterday's game will be re-aired on NFL Network this week?
Cards / Hawks Replay
- Thread starter RON_IN_OC
- Start date
DieHardFromMO
Hall of Famer
It is on Dec. 12th at 10:30 p.m. ET.
RON_IN_OC
https://www.ronevansrealty.com
sweet, not only will i love seeing a game on tv that i saw in person but to hear the commentaries and such will be sweet.
On the web-site, it says it's on at 5:30PM ET. That would be 3:30PM Arizona time. It then has a replay at 10:30 PM ET which is 8:30PM Arizona time. This is on the NFL network, channel 212 on Direct TV on Tuesday, December 12, 2006.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Posts
- 9,388
- Reaction score
- 4
Wow! Cool thanks.
Does anyone know if NFL HD shows the original HD broadcast?
Was yesterday's game in 1080i?? I don't think so....I've only seen those cameras, right in front of me, for the Chicago game.
Wow! Cool thanks.
Does anyone know if NFL HD shows the original HD broadcast?
The NFL channel has an HD channel?
Well, this map states that the game was in HD at least.
You must be registered for see images
Yep. It was just added to Cox.
COX opened the NFL HD channel 2 days prior to thankgiving.
I hope Direct TV gets it. The NFL's game broadcasts are really fuzzy. Sometimes it looks like it isn't even digital.
Red Dawn
Go Big Red!
The Thursday night games are broadcast in HD on Direct Tv Channel 92 and on Dish network Channel 9426.
I'm not sure if the rebroadcasts are on the HD channel.
http://www.nfl.com/nflngames
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2005
- Posts
- 46,342
- Reaction score
- 12,010
Speaking of HD, I saw a football preview in 1080P yesterday. It's as much ahead of 1080i as 720P is ahead of 480i. I was truly amazed.
"I totally don't know what that means, but I want it."
BigRedArk
ASFN Lifer
Yup it was there. Thanks for the tip, 40.
It was weird watching the replay on TV, since the action was filmed from the opposite side of where I sit, seeing the plays left-to-right instead of right-to-left was odd.
That "int" was a Fitz catch no question. I do like Brennamen as the play-by-play guy. Much better than the scrubs we normally get.
I need to invest in a bigger screen TV to accomodate those close-ups of Gabe Watson.
- Joined
- May 13, 2002
- Posts
- 39,223
- Reaction score
- 27,001
So, the refs actually told Denny BEFORE the review that it could only be incomplete or intercepted? If so, they were wrong and really, really screwed that call up. It was an obvious catch by Fitz.
And, yes, I really liked that crew. Best to call one of our games in a long, long time. I hope we get them for either of the last two games.
BigRedArk
ASFN Lifer
I thought that PI call on the much-maligned Rolle was pure nitpickin' by the refs. Other than that facemask penalty on him that gave the hags a 1st down I thought he played a pretty good game. We got 3 sacks on Hasselbeck because of good secondary coverage for the most part it seemed. Rolle should get some credit for that.
That fitz call was possibly one of the worst of all season, for any team. Blown on replay. There is an angle showing peterson laying on the ground, fitz clearly down, CLEARLY BEEN DOWN, and no ball in peterson's hands, while he lays sprawled out on the field...then he strips it..
By the ruling of that, you could tackle a guy, then after he's down, take the ball from him and it's an interception.
Just a disgustingly bad call. TERRIBLE. Should have been our ball on the 5 yard line.
And Seahawk writers had the temerity to say that they were getting the short end of the calls? Really? Holy NFL apology letter batman, but that was just wrong, wrong, wrong.
For the rest of the year, everyone please when referring to Leinart's passing stats, make sure you subtract one interception because even Ray Charles saw that one was not an INT.
By the ruling of that, you could tackle a guy, then after he's down, take the ball from him and it's an interception.
Just a disgustingly bad call. TERRIBLE. Should have been our ball on the 5 yard line.
And Seahawk writers had the temerity to say that they were getting the short end of the calls? Really? Holy NFL apology letter batman, but that was just wrong, wrong, wrong.
For the rest of the year, everyone please when referring to Leinart's passing stats, make sure you subtract one interception because even Ray Charles saw that one was not an INT.
Last edited:
Billy Flynt
Pirate, 300 yrs too late
I disagree, the hook was clear. Initially I thought Rolle batted the ball, but after several zoomed HD replays, it was clear he never touched the ball. Had he tipped it, I dont think it is PI.
BigRedArk
ASFN Lifer
Well then maybe, maybe not. Either way it was pretty close. He still played a pretty good game and the secondary forced at least 2 if not all of the sacks in the game and Rolle should get some credit for it.
Well if he was still alive he would have
Dude, he saw that from the grave.
