Trey
Registered
I guess the truth hurts, eh bills phan? ![Big Grin :D :D]()
Russ Smith said:We signed King last year to a contract for more money than the guy he was signed to backup.
And for the record, Shelton does not make more money than either Big or Ross so he wouldn't be backing up guys who make less than him. He does make MORE than Step, Wells and Brown/Bridges maybe you mean them.
bills_phan said:Ya, it would really suck if the Bills signed him with NO compensation given to the Cards.
That Denny Green is a hard ass negotiator!
Russ Smith said:It's funny you think the bills WON something here. Basically they need a LT, and they want to get rid of Henry, and so far thanks to TD they've done neither. The Cards needed a RB, and wanted to get rid of Shelton, and they've done both without swapping draft picks or having Shelton rip the organization and threaten a holdout.
Seems to me Green ate Donahoe for breakfast.
I'm glad Russ is on our side.cheesebeef said:SHEESH - when you put it into perspective - yeah - Guess we did win on that one.
Russ Smith said:Well the reality is they probably won't sign him. Chicago and Detroit are both teams he'd prefer, he played at Eastern Michigan in college, and he openly said he was interested in Chicago when he first asked to be traded.
I just think it would be funny after TD saying they didn't like the player we were offering, if TD tried to sign Shelton.
It's funny you think the bills WON something here. Basically they need a LT, and they want to get rid of Henry, and so far thanks to TD they've done neither. The Cards needed a RB, and wanted to get rid of Shelton, and they've done both without swapping draft picks or having Shelton rip the organization and threaten a holdout.
Seems to me Green ate Donahoe for breakfast.
bills_phan said:Ya, it would really suck if the Bills signed him with NO compensation given to the Cards.
That Denny Green is a hard ass negotiator!
BigDavis75 said:Aside from who won in this deal, I'm pretty pissed. I mean, we didn't get anything for Shelton, not even 7th. I'm not against getting rid of him at all, but was no one even willing to trade a 7th? The only reason for not trading him would be that as part of the deal we would have to pay some of his salary or something like that. On the other hand, I'm glad he will be almost completely off the books in 2006. Our cap is looking really good for 2006.
spanky1 said:Let's see what the Bills get for Henry before you start making statements like this
BigDavis75 said:Aside from who won in this deal, I'm pretty pissed. I mean, we didn't get anything for Shelton, not even 7th. I'm not against getting rid of him at all, but was no one even willing to trade a 7th?
bills_phan said:LMAO!!!
![]()
LoyaltyisaCurse said:...He will sign for under 2mil per,making him a bargain considering he could start on atleast 1/2 teams in NFL.
Green looks like he had more than Donahoe for breakfast.GreenCard said:Watch it bills_phan Green had Donahoe for breakfast and these guys will have you for lunch.
Whatever, you make it sound like the Cards would not have made out well by not HAVING to pick a RB in the 1st two rounds. Had they swapped picks like Buffalo wanted, they could have had their CB at #1, another NEED at #2 and their starting running back all in the 1st two rounds. Is this team now so complete that another 2nd round talent would have been meaningless? I didn't realize they were just 2 players away from the Super Bowl.Russ Smith said:Well the reality is they probably won't sign him. Chicago and Detroit are both teams he'd prefer, he played at Eastern Michigan in college, and he openly said he was interested in Chicago when he first asked to be traded.
I just think it would be funny after TD saying they didn't like the player we were offering, if TD tried to sign Shelton.
It's funny you think the bills WON something here. Basically they need a LT, and they want to get rid of Henry, and so far thanks to TD they've done neither. The Cards needed a RB, and wanted to get rid of Shelton, and they've done both without swapping draft picks or having Shelton rip the organization and threaten a holdout.
Seems to me Green ate Donahoe for breakfast.
bills_phan said:Whatever, you make it sound like the Cards would not have made out well by not HAVING to pick a RB in the 1st two rounds. Had they swapped picks like Buffalo wanted, they could have had their CB at #1, another NEED at #2 and their starting running back all in the 1st two rounds. Is this team now so complete that another 2nd round talent would have been meaningless? I didn't realize they were just 2 players away from the Super Bowl.
All Arizona was offering was LJ Shelton, who the Bills can have for NOTHING but a contract, and probably less than the $3 million per that the Cards were being fleeced for. The truth is more likely that Buffalo would rather stick with what they have rather than even pursuing Shelton at this point - but the option is certainly there. Of the two players mentioned in this failed trade, only one is still of any value whatsoever to his team, and it's not the recently cut LJ Shelton. I can't see how any reasonable person can claim that the Cards gained anything by not getting anything for their former 1st round pick.
bills_phan said:The truth is more likely that Buffalo would rather stick with what they have rather than even pursuing Shelton at this point - but the option is certainly there.
Who the hell do you think is going to sign this guy this far into free agency for $3 million per year? There's no way he gets that much now, so whoever signs him will likely get him cheaper than if they had traded for him.Russ Smith said:So let's get this straight, Donahoe the genius is so smart he knows he can get Shelton for nothing, yet it never occurred to him that he might try telling Shelton we'll trade for you, but you have to agree to restructure before we deal? That way he gets a LT, for less money, and doesn't have to compete with other teams for his services. Seems pretty obvious, if Shelton's salary was the problem, ask him to take a paycut?
The thing about rookies is, YOU NEVER KNOW. Arrington doesn't have Kijana Carter's potential.Russ Smith said:The Cards got a RB who IMHO will be as good or better than Henry. He's got far less wear and tear on his body, his running style doesn't lend itself to injury as much as Henry's does (he's had a serious neck injury and 2 fairly serious leg injuries in his career already). Arrington is younger, faster and a better fit for Green's offense. Henry is good, never questioned that, but he makes too much money for a guy coming off 2 injury years, he's in the last year of his contract, and if you look at his history you can almost BANK that he's going to be a problem to resign.
Every worthwhile player will get paid eventually. If your draft picks are any good they will get paid down the line as well. I guess your whole point depends on Arrington being a success in the NFL.Russ Smith said:Travis Henry is no dummy(well he is but in a different sense), he saw how much money Lamont Jordan got from the Raiders, he was drafted the same year as Jordan(after him), he gained far more yards than Jordan(because of Curtis Martin) and he's very likely going to ask for a contract as good or better than what Jordan got. Anybody think the Cards were going to fork over near that much for Henry when they can draft their own RB for a LOT less money? If the Cards had swapped picks one of the guys we picked might not have been there.
And instead they got nothing for Shelton.Russ Smith said:The only way the Cards were ever going to do that deal before the draft was Henry for Shelton period. During the draft if Arrington had been gone, Donahoe MIGHT have gotten Green to swap picks to make that deal, can't say for sure don't have a hotline to Green afterall.
And once again you're ignoring that potential 2nd round pick that they could have used on another need position. All reports indicate that Buffalo didn't trade for Shelton because they didn't think he was starting material, didn't think he was worth what he was getting paid and didn't think he was good value for Henry. One guy was cut, the other was not. I fail to see how trading for Shelton suddenly makes the Bills' offensive line a much better offensive line.Russ Smith said:But the outcome is pretty hard to dispute, the Cards have their RB(and cheaper than Henry) they unloaded Shelton without him becoming a problem and damaging the reputation of anybody, they only thing they didn't get was something for Shelton. Buffalo didn't get their LT, they haven't traded Henry, their best offer is a 5th rounder, Henry skipped minicamp, repeated he won't play for Buffalo this year. How can you look at the outcome of this and think because Shelton was cut, Donahoe was smart?
Again, who has the money to pay this guy $3 million per year? Should he sign for anything less, your whole point is out the window. Players restructure - they rarely, if ever, give money back.Russ Smith said:Even if you do sign Shelton he'll probably cost more due to competition than he would have cost if Donahoe had just demanded he take a paycut or no trade.
bills_phan said:Who the hell do you think is going to sign this guy this far into free agency for $3 million per year? There's no way he gets that much now, so whoever signs him will likely get him cheaper than if they had traded for him.
The thing about rookies is, YOU NEVER KNOW. Arrington doesn't have Kijana Carter's potential.
You're also ignoring the player you could have picked with your 2nd if you had aquired Henry and not had to take a RB with that pick.
Every worthwhile player will get paid eventually. If your draft picks are any good they will get paid down the line as well. I guess your whole point depends on Arrington being a success in the NFL.
And instead they got nothing for Shelton.
And once again you're ignoring that potential 2nd round pick that they could have used on another need position. All reports indicate that Buffalo didn't trade for Shelton because they didn't think he was starting material, didn't think he was worth what he was getting paid and didn't think he was good value for Henry. One guy was cut, the other was not. I fail to see how trading for Shelton suddenly makes the Bills' offensive line a much better offensive line.
Again, who has the money to pay this guy $3 million per year? Should he sign for anything less, your whole point is out the window. Players restructure - they rarely, if ever, give money back.