I suppose we should have a thread on the imminent lockout and ongoing labor negotiations.
Here's an interesting read form Henry Abbott at ESPN:
http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/30819/11-thoughts-about-the-end-of-the-cba
Some excerpts:
Here's an interesting read form Henry Abbott at ESPN:
http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/30819/11-thoughts-about-the-end-of-the-cba
Some excerpts:
The motivation behind a team-by-team hard cap is not to give owners a sense of how much players will cost. It's to give owners a sense of how much competing will cost. Now that we don't have the high-payroll, low-wins Knicks to kick around anymore, it's fairly clear that spending more on salaries correlates decently with winning (although the Bulls are an exception). The Mavericks spent the most and won. Teams that spent very little (Timberwolves, Clippers, Cavaliers, Kings) generally did poorly. Competitive owners like Mark Cuban -- who has faced steep losses in recent years -- are left in a tough position: win or be profitable? With a hard cap, Cuban's losses would be controlled or eliminated even as he goes all-out to beat the competition. This is a big decision for the owners to make. Cuban can save money right now by standing down in the never-ending arms race of signing all the best players. Is it worth a lockout to save him, and owners like him, from themselves?