How would you articulate their theory, and what part of it makes you skeptical?
From a roster-building standpoint, I think it's a consistent effort to shop in the scratch-and-dent bin. There's been no pressure for the past two years, but that will mount over time. As a fan, I don't want to wait.
Maybe Darius Robinson ends up better than Zach Allen; maybe Max Melton ends up better than Byron Murphy. I'm certain that both Allen and Murphy are better than Justin Jones and Sean Murphy-Bunting, respectively. But I had to watch Phil Hoskins and Starling Thomas III play snaps for my team, and we're gonna have to play pretty good to make up for that.
Same with the old draft class. Darius Robinson will be 24 when the season kicks off (he's nine months and 12 days younger than Cam Thomas); so will Tip Reiman. Elijah Jones played 60 college football games. When these guys' rookie contracts are up, they're going to be older than Budda Baker is right now. Hopefully that means that they're ready to play faster than, say, BJ Ojulari, but it also means they're likely maxed out or close to maxed in development.
From a coaching perspective, I don't really know what the core values are, because these guys mostly talk in platitudes. It's hard for me to separate what they actually do from what people talk about them doing/imposing a narrative. I'm pretty sure in the NFL you run when you win, not the other way around. But we passed plenty last year -- 44% of our offense were rushes (per PFR). People I like and trust say that the offense and defense were doing fun and interesting things constrained by bad personnel; I have no reason to dispute that.
I think Nick Rallis is a cool dude; I think Jonathan Gannon is a try hard. I also know I don't really have enough information to judge these dudes' real character. Everyone is saying the right thing, so you just have to judge the results on the field.
Results so far are 4-12.