Chad Williams...

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
I know I sound like a broken record but that pick could have been Cordrea Tankersley or as someone else pointed out Kizer.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,407
Reaction score
4,153
Location
Monroe NC
Is not the first time they see potential when there is not
Certainly u dont draft a player like Williams in round 3
Nobody was going to touch him till round 5/6

I looked and looked and I could find nothing that indicated that Williams was worthy of being drafted in the third round. Every place I looked he was a third day player. He was ranked in the mid twenties among receivers. I would like to hear the explanation from Keim as to how they ranked Williams so high.
 

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
I looked and looked and I could find nothing that indicated that Williams was worthy of being drafted in the third round. Every place I looked he was a third day player. He was ranked in the mid twenties among receivers. I would like to hear the explanation from Keim as to how they ranked Williams so high.

Keim likes small school offensive sleepers in the 3rd round...it is a pattern:

John Brown, Pittsburg St. (KS)
David Johnson, Northern Iowa
Chad Williams, Grambling

Gotta give him credit on the 1st two. I think Chad Williams will come around. It was going to be hard for him to beat out the established veterans Fitz, Jaron, Smokey, J.J. in year one as early as game 1. Plus, I think BA had big plans for Aaron Dobson, but Dobson's training camp injury put a damper on those plans. BA has actually praised Chad Williams for his play in practice recently. It's a classic BA tear em down and build em back up coaching tactic.
 

Capital Card

The Kobayashi of Kool-Aid
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
3,132
Reaction score
289
Location
Pigskin Slaughter House-Smithfield, VA

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
cardpa---

I think there is no question that Chad Williams was heavily on SK's radar when Williams torched Arizona last fall. I imagine Keim was thinking 5th or 6th round back then. But, Williams started to draw some pretty heavy attention when he played so well in the E/W game which then got him an invite to the Senior Bowl, where Williams was very good in practice.

I know that the WR Keim wanted most in the 3rd round was Carlos Henderson, who would have been available at #77 (had the Cardinals not given that pick up when they traded up for Budda Baker. Henderson was taken at #82 by the Broncos. Thus, because Henderson had been taken and knowing that Chad Williams' stock was rising in Mobile, I think at #98, Keim felt that was as good a time as any.

What surprised me is that I thought (and still think) that WR Josh Reynolds (6-3, 192) was a perfect choice for the Cardinals in that Reynolds is very Michael Floyd-esque, same length, maybe even better speed and definitely better hands. Reynolds performed well in the Senior Bowl game, catching a nice TD, whereas Chad Williams had a quiet day production-wise. The Rams took Reynolds in the 4th round, pick #118, three picks after the Cardinals took G Dorian Johnson at #115.

Hopefully, Chad Williams has a better career than Josh Reynolds.
 
Last edited:

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
WR has historically been one of the more difficult positions to translate from college to pro.
Exactly... not many make the 1st year transition (except Cooper Kupp :)). Going against DIII defenses doesn't get them ready. Can't imagine he played against many good ones. That being said I don't like him.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,668
Location
CA
For a team that believed their window for a SB was closing, most of their picks should've been focused on guys they felt could step in right away...windows don't wait for projects.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,929
Reaction score
26,062
Location
Orlando, FL
I agree that opposing DB's can tee off on Fitz, Smoke and JJ when we don't have a big guy out there as a receiving option.

But, if it's felt that C Williams hasn't earned a receiving role, why not give the 6-6 Rutgers dude a shot?

I liked Agudosi which is why I said right after the draft he was likely their top UDFA signing. That said he's very raw. The nitwits coaching him rarely even threw to him. I doubt he's ready to help now, but he may turn out to be a great red zone option and maybe a third down option as well.
 

CFLredzoned

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Posts
1,703
Reaction score
1,305
Location
Melbourne, FL
The only beef I have with the way Cardinals draft the WR position is that I wish they would place a higher emphasis on ball skills - ie. hands and positioning for the ball. It seems like they get enamored with speed and measurables, with ball skills being an afterthought. Besides the obvious measurables, ball skills should be the easiest thing to evaluate - on film and looking at stats.

I agree that Williams should have been a 5th/6th round selection due to his obvious lack of ball skills. Not to mention, poor route running. Right after the draft, I heard an ex-scout break down the receivers on a podcast. He never heard of Williams so went back and watched all his game tape. Said Williams ran the sloppiest routes out of the class. Whatever he did in the AZ game must have been extraordinary.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,407
Reaction score
4,153
Location
Monroe NC
The only beef I have with the way Cardinals draft the WR position is that I wish they would place a higher emphasis on ball skills - ie. hands and positioning for the ball. It seems like they get enamored with speed and measurables, with ball skills being an afterthought. Besides the obvious measurables, ball skills should be the easiest thing to evaluate - on film and looking at stats.

I agree that Williams should have been a 5th/6th round selection due to his obvious lack of ball skills. Not to mention, poor route running. Right after the draft, I heard an ex-scout break down the receivers on a podcast. He never heard of Williams so went back and watched all his game tape. Said Williams ran the sloppiest routes out of the class. Whatever he did in the AZ game must have been extraordinary.

Spot on, I went back and watched the AZ game highlights of Williams and his route running was sloppy to say the least. He doesn't have that burst needed to run under deep throws. In the AZ game the QB threw a nice high deep ball that Williams should have been able to get under yet somehow he failed to do so.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
I liked Agudosi which is why I said right after the draft he was likely their top UDFA signing. That said he's very raw. The nitwits coaching him rarely even threw to him. I doubt he's ready to help now, but he may turn out to be a great red zone option and maybe a third down option as well.
OT - Harry, you're located in Orlando? How are you making out post-Irma?
 

vince56

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
9,082
Reaction score
2,311
Location
Arizona
Kenny Golladay was picked 2 picks in front of Chad Williams and ate us alive last week.

No excuses, play your damn players, and if they're not good enough, replace your scouts.
 
Top