I'm probably in the minority now, but I was glad when they got Kolb originally, because I thought he had the most potential of everyone available at the time. I was also glad they extended him on his deadline, because if we don't get Manning and we lose Kolb then we're left with basically nothing. I still think it was the right move, even though he's sucked so far. They didn't know he was going to suck this hard in camp and preseason and they doubled down on the dude. I don't fault them for trying to get us a QB and throwing money at the problem. That's what it takes.
However, what I do have an issue with is their evaluation process. It's disheartening, to me at least, when dudes on here can evaluate a QB better than our FO. That pisses me off. Not that I don't love this forum and all of you on it, but that should never happen. When people on here say a dude sucks and the FO gets him because they see something, I expect all of you to be proven wrong. They get paid huge money to evaluate better than us.
I still hope Kolb outplays all of our expectations. And as much as we bitch about the guy, I know most of you hope he plays outstanding for us. The alternative, after DA and Hall, Ad nauseam, the alternative is that we have a staff who can't evaluate sh*t when it comes to QB's--or the Oline to be honest--and if that's the case we're in real trouble as a franchise going forward.